Showing 22,004 of 22,004 total issues
Method dispatch_request
has 105 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def dispatch_request(from, buf)
type = buf.unpack('C').first
if (type != Constants::Request)
#dlog("Unknown DHCP request type: #{type}")
return
Method cmd_jobs
has 105 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def cmd_jobs(*args)
# Make the default behavior listing all jobs if there were no options
# or the only option is the verbose flag
args.unshift("-l") if args.empty? || args == ["-v"]
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
this.assignSub = operation(function sub(a, b) {
var carry = 0;
for (var i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
var cur = a.byteAt(i) - b.byteAt(i) - carry;
carry = cur < 0 | 0;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 119.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
this.assignAdd = operation(function add(a, b) {
var carry = 0;
for (var i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
var cur = a.byteAt(i) + b.byteAt(i) + carry;
carry = cur > 0xff | 0;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 119.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
File bypassuac_injection_winsxs.rb
has 341 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class MetasploitModule < Msf::Exploit::Local
Rank = ExcellentRanking
include Exploit::EXE
include Exploit::FileDropper
File mimipenguin.rb
has 341 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
require 'unix_crypt'
class MetasploitModule < Msf::Post
include Msf::Post::Linux::Priv
include Msf::Post::Linux::System
File linux.rb
has 341 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module Msf::Payload::Linux
#
# This mixin is chained within payloads that target the Linux platform.
# It provides special prepends, to support things like chroot and setuid.
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
script = %Q|
var #{rand1} = unescape("#{shellcode}");
var #{rand2} ="";
for (#{rand3}=128;#{rand3}>=0;--#{rand3}) #{rand2} += unescape("#{nops}");
#{rand4} = #{rand2} + #{rand1};
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 143.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
content = %Q|<html>
<object classid='clsid:#{clsid}' id='#{chemview}'></object>
<script>
#{j_shellcode}=unescape('#{shellcode}');
#{j_nops}=unescape('#{nops}');
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 143.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Class Fs
has 33 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class Console::CommandDispatcher::Stdapi::Fs
Klass = Console::CommandDispatcher::Stdapi::Fs
include Console::CommandDispatcher
Method run
has 104 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def run
res = xymon_send('ping').to_s
unless res.starts_with? 'xymond'
print_error 'Target is not a Xymon daemon'
Method run
has 104 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def run
headings = [
["Database", "Schema", "Table", "Column", "Data Type", "Row Count"]
]
Method run
has 104 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def run
base_addr = datastore['BASEDNS']
targ_addr = datastore['TARGDNS']
check_ar = datastore['CHECK_ADDITIONAL']
check_aa = datastore['CHECK_AUTHORITY']
Method defines
has 104 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def defines
%^
#define _SEED 0x#{@hash.to_s(16)}
#define _ROR8(v) (v >> 8 | v << 24)
#define MAX_SYSCALLS 500
Method initialize
has 104 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize(info = {})
super(update_info(info,
'Name' => 'Wireshark LWRES Dissector getaddrsbyname_request Buffer Overflow (loop)',
'Description' => %q{
The LWRES dissector in Wireshark version 0.9.15 through 1.0.10 and 1.2.0 through
Method exploit
has 104 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def exploit
# Generate the WAR containing the payload
app_base = rand_text_alphanumeric(4+rand(32-4))
jsp_name = rand_text_alphanumeric(8+rand(8))
Method initialize
has 104 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize(info = {})
super(
update_info(
info,
'Name' => 'SaltStack Salt Master/Minion Unauthenticated RCE',
File header.rb
has 340 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
require 'net/dns/dns'
module Net # :nodoc:
module DNS
Method mssql_parse_tds_reply
has 104 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def mssql_parse_tds_reply(data, info)
info[:errors] ||= []
info[:colinfos] ||= []
info[:colnames] ||= []
Method cmd_exploit
has 104 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def cmd_exploit(*args, opts: {})
if (args.include?('-r') || args.include?('--reload-libs')) && !opts[:previously_reloaded]
driver.run_single('reload_lib -a')
end