File vim_soap.rb
has 597 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module Msf
module Exploit::Remote::VIMSoap
include Msf::Exploit::Remote::HttpClient
Method vim_take_screenshot
has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def vim_take_screenshot(vm, user, pass)
soap_data = vim_soap_envelope(vim_soap_create_screenshot(vm['ref']))
res = vim_send_soap_request(soap_data)
if res.class == Hash
task_id = res['CreateScreenshot_TaskResponse']['returnval']
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method vim_get_hosts
has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def vim_get_hosts(datacenter)
dc_hosts = []
soap_data = vim_soap_envelope(vim_soap_retrieve_properties('hostFolder', 'Datacenter' , datacenter))
res = vim_send_soap_request(soap_data)
if res.class == Hash
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method vim_take_screenshot
has 44 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def vim_take_screenshot(vm, user, pass)
soap_data = vim_soap_envelope(vim_soap_create_screenshot(vm['ref']))
res = vim_send_soap_request(soap_data)
if res.class == Hash
task_id = res['CreateScreenshot_TaskResponse']['returnval']
Method vim_powerOFF_vm
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def vim_powerOFF_vm(vm_ref)
soap_data = vim_soap_envelope(vim_soap_power_off_vm(vm_ref))
res = vim_send_soap_request(soap_data)
if res.class == Hash
task_id = res['PowerOffVM_TaskResponse']['returnval']
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method vim_find_vm_by_name
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def vim_find_vm_by_name(name)
vim_setup_references
@dcs.each do |dc|
soap_data = vim_soap_envelope(vim_soap_retrieve_properties('vmFolder', 'Datacenter' , dc['ref']))
res = vim_send_soap_request(soap_data)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method vim_powerON_vm
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def vim_powerON_vm(vm_ref)
soap_data = vim_soap_envelope(vim_soap_power_on_vm(vm_ref))
res = vim_send_soap_request(soap_data)
if res.class == Hash
task_id = res['PowerOnVM_TaskResponse']['returnval']
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method vim_get_hosts
has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def vim_get_hosts(datacenter)
dc_hosts = []
soap_data = vim_soap_envelope(vim_soap_retrieve_properties('hostFolder', 'Datacenter' , datacenter))
res = vim_send_soap_request(soap_data)
if res.class == Hash
Method vim_find_vm_by_name
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def vim_find_vm_by_name(name)
vim_setup_references
@dcs.each do |dc|
soap_data = vim_soap_envelope(vim_soap_retrieve_properties('vmFolder', 'Datacenter' , dc['ref']))
res = vim_send_soap_request(soap_data)
Method vim_get_vms
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def vim_get_vms
vim_setup_references
@vmrefs = []
vmlist= []
@dcs.each do |dc|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method vim_powerOFF_vm
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def vim_powerOFF_vm(vm_ref)
soap_data = vim_soap_envelope(vim_soap_power_off_vm(vm_ref))
res = vim_send_soap_request(soap_data)
if res.class == Hash
task_id = res['PowerOffVM_TaskResponse']['returnval']
Method vim_powerON_vm
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def vim_powerON_vm(vm_ref)
soap_data = vim_soap_envelope(vim_soap_power_on_vm(vm_ref))
res = vim_send_soap_request(soap_data)
if res.class == Hash
task_id = res['PowerOnVM_TaskResponse']['returnval']
Method vim_get_dcs
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def vim_get_dcs
soap_data = vim_soap_envelope(vim_soap_retrieve_service_content)
res = vim_send_soap_request(soap_data)
if res.class == Hash
@server_objects.merge!(res['RetrieveServiceContentResponse']['returnval'])
Method vim_get_dc_vms
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def vim_get_dc_vms(datacenter)
soap_data = vim_soap_envelope(vim_soap_retrieve_properties('vmFolder', 'Datacenter', datacenter))
res = vim_send_soap_request(soap_data)
if res.class == Hash
vmfolder = res['RetrievePropertiesResponse']['returnval']['propSet']['val']
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return Hash.from_xml(res.body)['Envelope']['Body']
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return :error
Method vim_get_dcs
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def vim_get_dcs
soap_data = vim_soap_envelope(vim_soap_retrieve_service_content)
res = vim_send_soap_request(soap_data)
if res.class == Hash
@server_objects.merge!(res['RetrieveServiceContentResponse']['returnval'])
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method vim_get_session
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def vim_get_session
soap_data = vim_soap_envelope(vim_soap_retrieve_service_content)
res = send_request_cgi({
'uri' => '/sdk',
'method' => 'POST',
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method vim_send_soap_request
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def vim_send_soap_request(soap_data)
res = send_request_cgi({
'uri' => '/sdk',
'method' => 'POST',
'agent' => 'VMware VI Client',
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def vim_powerON_vm(vm_ref)
soap_data = vim_soap_envelope(vim_soap_power_on_vm(vm_ref))
res = vim_send_soap_request(soap_data)
if res.class == Hash
task_id = res['PowerOnVM_TaskResponse']['returnval']
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 93.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def vim_powerOFF_vm(vm_ref)
soap_data = vim_soap_envelope(vim_soap_power_off_vm(vm_ref))
res = vim_send_soap_request(soap_data)
if res.class == Hash
task_id = res['PowerOffVM_TaskResponse']['returnval']
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 93.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def vim_get_session_list
soap_data = vim_soap_envelope(vim_soap_retrieve_properties('sessionList','SessionManager', @server_objects['sessionManager']))
res = vim_send_soap_request(soap_data)
if res.class == Hash
session_list = []
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 40.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def vim_get_domains
soap_data = vim_soap_envelope(vim_soap_retrieve_properties('domainList', 'UserDirectory', @server_objects['userDirectory']))
res = vim_send_soap_request(soap_data)
if res.class == Hash
domains = []
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 40.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def vim_get_roles
soap_data = vim_soap_envelope(vim_soap_retrieve_properties('roleList', 'AuthorizationManager', @server_objects['authorizationManager']))
res = vim_send_soap_request(soap_data)
if res.class == Hash
roles = []
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 40.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def vim_soap_log_user_event_vm(vm_ref,msg)
soap_data = '<LogUserEvent xmlns="urn:vim25">'
soap_data << '<_this type="EventManager">' + @server_objects['eventManager'] + '</_this>'
soap_data << '<entity type="VirtualMachine">' + vm_ref + '</entity>'
soap_data << '<msg>' + msg + '</msg>'
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 30.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def vim_soap_login(user,pass)
soap_data = '<Login xmlns="urn:vim25">'
soap_data << '<_this type="SessionManager">' + @server_objects['sessionManager'] + '</_this>'
soap_data << '<userName>' + user + '</userName>'
soap_data << '<password>' + pass + '</password>'
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 30.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def vim_soap_session_active?(key, user)
soap_data = '<SessionIsActive xmlns="urn:vim25">'
soap_data << '<_this type="SessionManager">' + @server_objects['sessionManager'] + '</_this>'
soap_data << '<sessionID>' + key+ '</sessionID>'
soap_data << '<userName>' + user + '</userName>'
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 30.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def vim_get_dc_name(dc)
soap_data = vim_soap_envelope(vim_soap_retrieve_properties('name','Datacenter',dc))
res = vim_send_soap_request(soap_data)
if res.class == Hash
return res['RetrievePropertiesResponse']['returnval']['propSet']['val']
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 28.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def vim_get_host_hw(host)
soap_data = vim_soap_envelope(vim_soap_retrieve_properties('hardware', 'HostSystem' , host))
res = vim_send_soap_request(soap_data)
if res.class == Hash
return res['RetrievePropertiesResponse']['returnval']['propSet']['val']
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 28.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76