Method get_sysinfo
has 80 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def get_sysinfo
system_data = {}
etc_files = cmd_exec('ls /etc').split
kernel_version = cmd_exec('uname -a')
Method get_sysinfo
has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def get_sysinfo
system_data = {}
etc_files = cmd_exec('ls /etc').split
kernel_version = cmd_exec('uname -a')
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File system.rb
has 290 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module Msf
class Post
module Linux
module System
include ::Msf::Post::Common
Method get_container_type
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def get_container_type
# Checking file paths for solution
container_type =
if file?('/.dockerenv') || file?('/.dockerinit')
'Docker'
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method get_container_type
has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def get_container_type
# Checking file paths for solution
container_type =
if file?('/.dockerenv') || file?('/.dockerinit')
'Docker'
Method listen_tcp_ports
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def listen_tcp_ports
ports = []
content = read_file('/proc/net/tcp')
content.each_line do |line|
next unless (m = line.match(/^\s*\d+:\s+(.{8}|.{32}):(.{4})\s+(.{8}|.{32}):(.{4})\s+(.{2})/))
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method get_cpu_info
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def get_cpu_info
info = {}
orig = read_file('/proc/cpuinfo').to_s
cpuinfo = orig.split("\n\n")[0]
# This is probably a more platform independent way to parse the results (compared to splitting and assigning preset indices to values)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method listen_udp_ports
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def listen_udp_ports
ports = []
content = read_file('/proc/net/udp')
content.each_line do |line|
next unless (m = line.match(/^\s*\d+:\s+(.{8}|.{32}):(.{4})\s+(.{8}|.{32}):(.{4})\s+(.{2})/))
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return 'Podman'
Method ips
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def ips
lines = read_file('/proc/net/fib_trie')
result = []
previous_line = ''
lines.each_line do |line|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def nosuid?(file_path)
mount = read_file('/proc/mounts').to_s
mount_path = get_mount_path(file_path)
mount.lines.each do |l|
return true if l =~ Regexp.new("#{mount_path} (.*)nosuid(.*)")
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 33.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def noexec?(file_path)
mount = read_file('/proc/mounts').to_s
mount_path = get_mount_path(file_path)
mount.lines.each do |l|
return true if l =~ Regexp.new("#{mount_path} (.*)noexec(.*)")
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 33.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76