File exe.rb has 1416 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module Msf
module Util
#
# The class provides methods for creating and encoding executable file
# formats for various platforms. It is a replacement for the previousClass EXE has 74 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class EXE
require 'rex'
require 'rex/peparsey'
require 'rex/pescan'Method to_executable_fmt has a Cognitive Complexity of 67 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.to_executable_fmt(framework, arch, plat, code, fmt, exeopts)
# For backwards compatibility with the way this gets called when
# generating from Msf::Simple::Payload.generate_simple
if arch.kind_of? Array
output = nil- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method to_executable_fmt has 175 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.to_executable_fmt(framework, arch, plat, code, fmt, exeopts)
# For backwards compatibility with the way this gets called when
# generating from Msf::Simple::Payload.generate_simple
if arch.kind_of? Array
output = nilMethod to_executable has a Cognitive Complexity of 41 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.to_executable(framework, arch, plat, code = '', opts = {})
if elf? code or macho? code
return code
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method win32_rwx_exec_thread has 111 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.win32_rwx_exec_thread(code, block_offset, which_offset='start')
stub_block = Rex::Payloads::Shuffle.from_graphml_file(
File.join(Msf::Config.install_root, 'data', 'shellcode', 'block_api.x86.graphml'),
arch: ARCH_X86,
name: 'api_call'Method exe_sub_method has a Cognitive Complexity of 27 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.exe_sub_method(code,opts ={})
pe = self.get_file_contents(opts[:template])
case opts[:exe_type]
when :service_exe- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method to_win32pe has a Cognitive Complexity of 26 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.to_win32pe(framework, code, opts = {})
# For backward compatibility, this is roughly equivalent to 'exe-small' fmt
if opts[:sub_method]
if opts[:inject]- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method to_win32pe has 89 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.to_win32pe(framework, code, opts = {})
# For backward compatibility, this is roughly equivalent to 'exe-small' fmt
if opts[:sub_method]
if opts[:inject]Method win32_rwx_exec has 84 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.win32_rwx_exec(code)
stub_block = Rex::Payloads::Shuffle.from_graphml_file(
File.join(Msf::Config.install_root, 'data', 'shellcode', 'block_api.x86.graphml'),
arch: ARCH_X86,
name: 'api_call'Method to_executable has 66 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.to_executable(framework, arch, plat, code = '', opts = {})
if elf? code or macho? code
return code
end
Method to_winpe_only has 44 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.to_winpe_only(framework, code, opts = {}, arch=ARCH_X86)
# Allow the user to specify their own EXE template
set_template_default(opts, "template_#{arch}_windows.exe")
Method exe_sub_method has 44 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.exe_sub_method(code,opts ={})
pe = self.get_file_contents(opts[:template])
case opts[:exe_type]
when :service_exeMethod to_osx_app has 39 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.to_osx_app(exe, opts = {})
exe_name = opts.fetch(:exe_name) { Rex::Text.rand_text_alpha(8) }
app_name = opts.fetch(:app_name) { Rex::Text.rand_text_alpha(8) }
hidden = opts.fetch(:hidden, true)
plist_extra = opts.fetch(:plist_extra, '')Method to_win32pe_old has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.to_win32pe_old(framework, code, opts = {})
payload = code.dup
# Allow the user to specify their own EXE template
set_template_default(opts, "template_x86_windows_old.exe")Method to_exe_vba has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.to_exe_vba(exes='')
exe = exes.unpack('C*')
hash_sub = {}
idx = 0
maxbytes = 2000Method to_executable_fmt_formats has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.to_executable_fmt_formats
[
"asp",
"aspx",
"aspx-exe",Method win32_rwx_exec_thread has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.win32_rwx_exec_thread(code, block_offset, which_offset='start')
stub_block = Rex::Payloads::Shuffle.from_graphml_file(
File.join(Msf::Config.install_root, 'data', 'shellcode', 'block_api.x86.graphml'),
arch: ARCH_X86,
name: 'api_call'- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method set_template_default has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.set_template_default(opts, exe = nil, path = nil)
# If no path specified, use the default one
path ||= File.join(Msf::Config.data_directory, "templates")
# If there's no default name, we must blow it up.- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method to_exe_vbs has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.to_exe_vbs(exes = '', opts = {})
delay = opts[:delay] || 5
persist = opts[:persist] || false
hash_sub = {}Method replace_msi_buffer has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.replace_msi_buffer(pe, opts)
opts[:msi_template_path] ||= File.join(Msf::Config.data_directory, "templates")
if opts[:msi_template].include?(File::SEPARATOR)
template = opts[:msi_template]Method to_war has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.to_war(jsp_raw, opts = {})
jsp_name = opts[:jsp_name]
jsp_name ||= Rex::Text.rand_text_alpha_lower(rand(8)+8)
app_name = opts[:app_name]
app_name ||= Rex::Text.rand_text_alpha_lower(rand(8)+8)Method to_exe_elf has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.to_exe_elf(framework, opts, template, code, big_endian=false)
if elf? code
return code
end
Method to_win32pe_old has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.to_win32pe_old(framework, code, opts = {})
payload = code.dup
# Allow the user to specify their own EXE template
set_template_default(opts, "template_x86_windows_old.exe")- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method to_exe_elf has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.to_exe_elf(framework, opts, template, code, big_endian=false)
if elf? code
return code
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method to_executable_fmt has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.to_executable_fmt(framework, arch, plat, code, fmt, exeopts)Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
case arch
when ARCH_X86,nil
to_solaris_x86_elf(framework, code, exeopts)
endMethod generate_nops has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.generate_nops(framework, arch, len, opts = {})
opts['BadChars'] ||= ''
opts['SaveRegisters'] ||= [ 'esp', 'ebp', 'esi', 'edi' ]
return nil unless framework.nops- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method to_exe_elf has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.to_exe_elf(framework, opts, template, code, big_endian=false)Method to_executable has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.to_executable(framework, arch, plat, code = '', opts = {})Method encode_stub has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.encode_stub(framework, arch, code, platform = nil, badchars = '')Method to_linux_x86_elf has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.to_linux_x86_elf(framework, code, opts = {})
default = true unless opts[:template]
if default
elf = to_exe_elf(framework, opts, "template_x86_linux.bin", code)- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method set_template_default_winpe_dll has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private_class_method def self.set_template_default_winpe_dll(opts, arch, size, flavor: nil)
return if opts[:template].present?
# dynamic size upgrading is only available when MSF selects the template because there's currently no way to
# determine the amount of space that is available in the template provided by the user so it's assumed to be 4KiB- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method win32_rwx_exec has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.win32_rwx_exec(code)
stub_block = Rex::Payloads::Shuffle.from_graphml_file(
File.join(Msf::Config.install_root, 'data', 'shellcode', 'block_api.x86.graphml'),
arch: ARCH_X86,
name: 'api_call'- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return to_bsd_x86_elf(framework, code)Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return to_linux_mipsbe_elf(framework, code)Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return to_win64pe(framework, code, opts)Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return to_linux_aarch64_elf(framework, code)Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return to_linux_mipsle_elf(framework, code)Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return to_solaris_x86_elf(framework, code)Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return to_osx_ppc_macho(framework, code)Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return to_bsd_x64_elf(framework, code)Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return to_osx_x64_macho(framework, code)Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return to_linux_x64_elf(framework, code, opts)Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return to_linux_armle_elf(framework, code)Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return to_osx_arm_macho(framework, code)Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return to_osx_aarch64_macho(framework, code)Method to_exe_vba has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.to_exe_vba(exes='')
exe = exes.unpack('C*')
hash_sub = {}
idx = 0
maxbytes = 2000- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method encode_stub has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.encode_stub(framework, arch, code, platform = nil, badchars = '')
return code unless framework.encoders
framework.encoders.each_module_ranked('Arch' => arch) do |name, mod|
begin
enc = framework.encoders.create(name)- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
when 1 # ELFCLASS32 - 32 bit (ruby 1.9+)
if big_endian
elf[0x44,4] = [elf.length].pack('N') #p_filesz
elf[0x48,4] = [elf.length + code.length].pack('N') #p_memsz
else # little endian- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 49.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
when 2 # ELFCLASS64 - 64 bit (ruby 1.9+)
if big_endian
elf[0x60,8] = [elf.length].pack('Q>') #p_filesz
elf[0x68,8] = [elf.length + code.length].pack('Q>') #p_memsz
else # little endian- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 49.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
when 'jsp'
arch ||= [ ARCH_X86 ]
tmp_plat = plat.platforms if plat
tmp_plat ||= Msf::Module::PlatformList.transform('win')
exe = Msf::Util::EXE.to_executable(framework, arch, tmp_plat, code, exeopts)- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 36.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
when 'war'
arch ||= [ ARCH_X86 ]
tmp_plat = plat.platforms if plat
tmp_plat ||= Msf::Module::PlatformList.transform('win')
exe = Msf::Util::EXE.to_executable(framework, arch, tmp_plat, code, exeopts)- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 36.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
"asp",
"aspx",
"aspx-exe",
"axis2",
"dll",- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 31.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if arch.index(ARCH_AARCH64)
if plat.index(Msf::Module::Platform::Linux)
return to_linux_aarch64_elf(framework, code)
end
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 27.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if arch.index(ARCH_ARMLE)
if plat.index(Msf::Module::Platform::OSX)
return to_osx_arm_macho(framework, code)
end
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 27.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def self.to_osx_ppc_macho(framework, code, opts = {})
# Allow the user to specify their own template
set_template_default(opts, "template_ppc_darwin.bin")
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 26.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def self.to_osx_x64_macho(framework, code, opts = {})
set_template_default(opts, "template_x64_darwin.bin")
macho = self.get_file_contents(opts[:template])
bin = self.find_payload_tag(macho,- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 26.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def self.to_osx_arm_macho(framework, code, opts = {})
# Allow the user to specify their own template
set_template_default(opts, "template_armle_darwin.bin")
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 26.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def self.to_osx_x86_macho(framework, code, opts = {})
# Allow the user to specify their own template
set_template_default(opts, "template_x86_darwin.bin")
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 26.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if opts[:inject]
injector = Msf::Exe::SegmentInjector.new({
:payload => code,
:template => opts[:template],
:arch => :x86,- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 26.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if opts[:inject]
injector = Msf::Exe::SegmentInjector.new({
:payload => code,
:template => opts[:template],
:arch => :x64,- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 26.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76