rapid7/metasploit-framework

View on GitHub
modules/auxiliary/admin/sap/cve_2020_6287_ws_add_user.rb

Summary

Maintainability
D
1 day
Test Coverage

Method action_add has a Cognitive Complexity of 24 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def action_add
    job = nil
    print_status('Starting the PCK Upgrade job...')
    job = invoke_pckupgrade
    print_good("Job running with session id: #{job.session_id}")
Severity: Minor
Found in modules/auxiliary/admin/sap/cve_2020_6287_ws_add_user.rb - About 3 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

File cve_2020_6287_ws_add_user.rb has 276 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

class MetasploitModule < Msf::Auxiliary
  include Msf::Exploit::Remote::HttpClient

  def initialize(info = {})
    super(
Severity: Minor
Found in modules/auxiliary/admin/sap/cve_2020_6287_ws_add_user.rb - About 2 hrs to fix

    Method invoke_pckupgrade has 56 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

      def invoke_pckupgrade
        message = { name: 'Netweaver.PI_PCK.PCK' }
        message[:data] = Nokogiri::XML(<<-ENVELOPE, nil, nil, Nokogiri::XML::ParseOptions::NOBLANKS).root.to_xml(indent: 0, save_with: 0)
          <PCK>
            <Usermanagement>
    Severity: Major
    Found in modules/auxiliary/admin/sap/cve_2020_6287_ws_add_user.rb - About 2 hrs to fix

      Method initialize has 44 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

        def initialize(info = {})
          super(
            update_info(
              info,
              'Name' => 'SAP Unauthenticated WebService User Creation',
      Severity: Minor
      Found in modules/auxiliary/admin/sap/cve_2020_6287_ws_add_user.rb - About 1 hr to fix

        Method action_add has 39 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

          def action_add
            job = nil
            print_status('Starting the PCK Upgrade job...')
            job = invoke_pckupgrade
            print_good("Job running with session id: #{job.session_id}")
        Severity: Minor
        Found in modules/auxiliary/admin/sap/cve_2020_6287_ws_add_user.rb - About 1 hr to fix

          Method action_remove has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

            def action_remove
              message = { name: 'DeleteUser' }
              message[:data] = Nokogiri::XML(<<-ENVELOPE, nil, nil, Nokogiri::XML::ParseOptions::NOBLANKS).root.to_xml(indent: 0, save_with: 0)
                <root>
                  <username secure="true">#{datastore['USERNAME'].encode(xml: :text)}</username>
          Severity: Minor
          Found in modules/auxiliary/admin/sap/cve_2020_6287_ws_add_user.rb - About 1 hr to fix

            Method check has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
            Open

              def check
                res = send_request_cgi(
                  {
                    'uri' => normalize_uri(target_uri.path),
                    'method' => 'GET',
            Severity: Minor
            Found in modules/auxiliary/admin/sap/cve_2020_6287_ws_add_user.rb - About 35 mins to fix

            Cognitive Complexity

            Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

            A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

            • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
            • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
            • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

            Further reading

            Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
            Open

              def cancel_execution
                envelope = Nokogiri::XML(<<-ENVELOPE, nil, nil, Nokogiri::XML::ParseOptions::NOBLANKS).root.to_xml(indent: 0, save_with: 0)
                  <soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:urn="urn:CTCWebServiceSi">
                     <soapenv:Header/>
                     <soapenv:Body>
            Severity: Minor
            Found in modules/auxiliary/admin/sap/cve_2020_6287_ws_add_user.rb and 1 other location - About 50 mins to fix
            modules/auxiliary/admin/sap/cve_2020_6287_ws_add_user.rb on lines 297..311

            Duplicated Code

            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

            Tuning

            This issue has a mass of 43.

            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

            Refactorings

            Further Reading

            Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
            Open

              def has_events_available? # rubocop:disable Naming/PredicateName
                envelope = Nokogiri::XML(<<-ENVELOPE, nil, nil, Nokogiri::XML::ParseOptions::NOBLANKS).root.to_xml(indent: 0, save_with: 0)
                  <soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:urn="urn:CTCWebServiceSi">
                     <soapenv:Header/>
                     <soapenv:Body>
            Severity: Minor
            Found in modules/auxiliary/admin/sap/cve_2020_6287_ws_add_user.rb and 1 other location - About 50 mins to fix
            modules/auxiliary/admin/sap/cve_2020_6287_ws_add_user.rb on lines 263..277

            Duplicated Code

            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

            Tuning

            This issue has a mass of 43.

            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

            Refactorings

            Further Reading

            Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
            Open

                envelope = Nokogiri::XML(<<-ENVELOPE, nil, nil, Nokogiri::XML::ParseOptions::NOBLANKS).root.to_xml(indent: 0, save_with: 0)
                  <soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:urn="urn:CTCWebServiceSi">
                    <soapenv:Header/>
                    <soapenv:Body>
                      <urn:execute>
            Severity: Minor
            Found in modules/auxiliary/admin/sap/cve_2020_6287_ws_add_user.rb and 1 other location - About 25 mins to fix
            modules/auxiliary/admin/sap/cve_2020_6287_ws_add_user.rb on lines 144..160

            Duplicated Code

            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

            Tuning

            This issue has a mass of 30.

            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

            Refactorings

            Further Reading

            Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
            Open

                envelope = Nokogiri::XML(<<-ENVELOPE, nil, nil, Nokogiri::XML::ParseOptions::NOBLANKS).root.to_xml(indent: 0, save_with: 0)
                  <soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:urn="urn:CTCWebServiceSi">
                    <soapenv:Header/>
                    <soapenv:Body>
                      <urn:executeSynchronious>
            Severity: Minor
            Found in modules/auxiliary/admin/sap/cve_2020_6287_ws_add_user.rb and 1 other location - About 25 mins to fix
            modules/auxiliary/admin/sap/cve_2020_6287_ws_add_user.rb on lines 231..247

            Duplicated Code

            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

            Tuning

            This issue has a mass of 30.

            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

            Refactorings

            Further Reading

            There are no issues that match your filters.

            Category
            Status