rapid7/metasploit-framework

View on GitHub
modules/auxiliary/scanner/sap/sap_router_portscanner.rb

Summary

Maintainability
D
2 days
Test Coverage

Method sap_port_info has 128 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def sap_port_info(port)

    case port.to_s

    when /^3299$/
Severity: Major
Found in modules/auxiliary/scanner/sap/sap_router_portscanner.rb - About 5 hrs to fix

    File sap_router_portscanner.rb has 349 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    class MetasploitModule < Msf::Auxiliary
      include Msf::Exploit::Remote::Tcp
      include Msf::Auxiliary::Report
    
      VALID_HOSTNAME_REGEX = /^(([a-zA-Z0-9]|[a-zA-Z0-9][a-zA-Z0-9\-]*[a-zA-Z0-9])\.)*([A-Za-z0-9]|[A-Za-z0-9][A-Za-z0-9\-]*[A-Za-z0-9])$/
    Severity: Minor
    Found in modules/auxiliary/scanner/sap/sap_router_portscanner.rb - About 4 hrs to fix

      Method run_host has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

        def run_host(ip)
          ports = datastore['PORTS']
      
          # if port definition has NN then we require INSTANCES
          if ports.include? 'NN' and datastore['INSTANCES'].nil?
      Severity: Minor
      Found in modules/auxiliary/scanner/sap/sap_router_portscanner.rb - About 3 hrs to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Method run_host has 69 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

        def run_host(ip)
          ports = datastore['PORTS']
      
          # if port definition has NN then we require INSTANCES
          if ports.include? 'NN' and datastore['INSTANCES'].nil?
      Severity: Major
      Found in modules/auxiliary/scanner/sap/sap_router_portscanner.rb - About 2 hrs to fix

        Method parse_response_packet has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

          def parse_response_packet(response, ip, port)
        
            #vprint_error("#{ip}:#{port} - response packet: #{response}")
        
            case response
        Severity: Minor
        Found in modules/auxiliary/scanner/sap/sap_router_portscanner.rb - About 1 hr to fix

          Method initialize has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

            def initialize
              super(
                'Name' => 'SAPRouter Port Scanner',
                'Description' => %q{
                    This module allows for mapping ACLs and identify open/closed ports accessible
          Severity: Minor
          Found in modules/auxiliary/scanner/sap/sap_router_portscanner.rb - About 1 hr to fix

            Method sap_instance_to_list has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
            Open

              def sap_instance_to_list(instance)
                instances = []
            
                return if !instance
            
            
            Severity: Minor
            Found in modules/auxiliary/scanner/sap/sap_router_portscanner.rb - About 25 mins to fix

            Cognitive Complexity

            Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

            A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

            • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
            • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
            • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

            Further reading

            Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
            Open

                instance.split(/,/).each do |item|
                  start, stop = item.split(/-/).map { |p| p.to_i }
            
                  start ||= 0
                  stop ||= item.match(/-/) ? 99 : start
            Severity: Major
            Found in modules/auxiliary/scanner/sap/sap_router_portscanner.rb and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
            modules/auxiliary/scanner/sap/sap_service_discovery.rb on lines 64..74

            Duplicated Code

            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

            Tuning

            This issue has a mass of 52.

            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

            Refactorings

            Further Reading

            Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
            Open

                  'Name' => 'SAPRouter Port Scanner',
                  'Description' => %q{
                      This module allows for mapping ACLs and identify open/closed ports accessible
                    on hosts through a saprouter.
                  },
            Severity: Minor
            Found in modules/auxiliary/scanner/sap/sap_router_portscanner.rb and 1 other location - About 20 mins to fix
            modules/auxiliary/scanner/http/jboss_vulnscan.rb on lines 15..32

            Duplicated Code

            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

            Tuning

            This issue has a mass of 28.

            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

            Refactorings

            Further Reading

            Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
            Open

                tbl = Msf::Ui::Console::Table.new(
                  Msf::Ui::Console::Table::Style::Default,
                  'Header' => "Portscan Results",
                  'Prefix' => "\n",
                  'Postfix' => "\n",
            Severity: Minor
            Found in modules/auxiliary/scanner/sap/sap_router_portscanner.rb and 1 other location - About 15 mins to fix
            modules/auxiliary/scanner/sap/sap_hostctrl_getcomputersystem.rb on lines 117..129

            Duplicated Code

            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

            Tuning

            This issue has a mass of 26.

            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

            Refactorings

            Further Reading

            There are no issues that match your filters.

            Category
            Status