rapid7/metasploit-framework

View on GitHub
modules/auxiliary/scanner/smb/smb_login.rb

Summary

Maintainability
D
2 days
Test Coverage

Method run_host has a Cognitive Complexity of 46 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def run_host(ip)
    print_brute(level: :vstatus, ip: ip, msg: 'Starting SMB login bruteforce')

    domain = datastore['SMBDomain'] || ''

Severity: Minor
Found in modules/auxiliary/scanner/smb/smb_login.rb - About 7 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method run_host has 124 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def run_host(ip)
    print_brute(level: :vstatus, ip: ip, msg: 'Starting SMB login bruteforce')

    domain = datastore['SMBDomain'] || ''

Severity: Major
Found in modules/auxiliary/scanner/smb/smb_login.rb - About 4 hrs to fix

    File smb_login.rb has 270 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    require 'metasploit/framework/login_scanner/smb'
    require 'metasploit/framework/credential_collection'
    
    class MetasploitModule < Msf::Auxiliary
      include Msf::Exploit::Remote::DCERPC
    Severity: Minor
    Found in modules/auxiliary/scanner/smb/smb_login.rb - About 2 hrs to fix

      Method initialize has 43 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

        def initialize
          super(
            'Name' => 'SMB Login Check Scanner',
            'Description' => %q{
              This module will test a SMB login on a range of machines and
      Severity: Minor
      Found in modules/auxiliary/scanner/smb/smb_login.rb - About 1 hr to fix

        Method report_creds has 37 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

          def report_creds(ip, port, result)
            if !datastore['RECORD_GUEST'] && (result.access_level == Metasploit::Framework::LoginScanner::SMB::AccessLevels::GUEST)
              return
            end
        
        
        Severity: Minor
        Found in modules/auxiliary/scanner/smb/smb_login.rb - About 1 hr to fix

          Method run has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

            def run
              results = super
              logins = results.flat_map { |_k, v| v[:successful_logins] }
              sessions = results.flat_map { |_k, v| v[:successful_sessions] }
              print_status("Bruteforce completed, #{logins.size} #{logins.size == 1 ? 'credential was' : 'credentials were'} successful.")
          Severity: Minor
          Found in modules/auxiliary/scanner/smb/smb_login.rb - About 55 mins to fix

          Cognitive Complexity

          Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

          A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

          • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
          • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
          • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

          Further reading

          Method report_creds has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

            def report_creds(ip, port, result)
              if !datastore['RECORD_GUEST'] && (result.access_level == Metasploit::Framework::LoginScanner::SMB::AccessLevels::GUEST)
                return
              end
          
          
          Severity: Minor
          Found in modules/auxiliary/scanner/smb/smb_login.rb - About 45 mins to fix

          Cognitive Complexity

          Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

          A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

          • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
          • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
          • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

          Further reading

          Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

            def run
              results = super
              logins = results.flat_map { |_k, v| v[:successful_logins] }
              sessions = results.flat_map { |_k, v| v[:successful_sessions] }
              print_status("Bruteforce completed, #{logins.size} #{logins.size == 1 ? 'credential was' : 'credentials were'} successful.")
          Severity: Major
          Found in modules/auxiliary/scanner/smb/smb_login.rb and 3 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
          modules/auxiliary/scanner/mssql/mssql_login.rb on lines 59..71
          modules/auxiliary/scanner/mysql/mysql_login.rb on lines 63..75
          modules/auxiliary/scanner/postgres/postgres_login.rb on lines 68..80

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 64.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

            def session_setup(result)
              return unless (result.connection && result.proof)
          
              my_session = Msf::Sessions::SMB.new(result.connection, { client: result.proof })
              merge_me = {
          Severity: Minor
          Found in modules/auxiliary/scanner/smb/smb_login.rb and 1 other location - About 55 mins to fix
          modules/auxiliary/scanner/ldap/ldap_login.rb on lines 173..187

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 44.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                  invalidate_login(
                    address: ip,
                    port: rport,
                    protocol: 'tcp',
                    public: result.credential.public,
          Severity: Minor
          Found in modules/auxiliary/scanner/smb/smb_login.rb and 1 other location - About 30 mins to fix
          modules/auxiliary/scanner/smb/smb_login.rb on lines 227..237

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 32.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                  invalidate_login(
                    address: ip,
                    port: rport,
                    protocol: 'tcp',
                    public: result.credential.public,
          Severity: Minor
          Found in modules/auxiliary/scanner/smb/smb_login.rb and 1 other location - About 30 mins to fix
          modules/auxiliary/scanner/smb/smb_login.rb on lines 211..221

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 32.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          There are no issues that match your filters.

          Category
          Status