Method mssql_get_hash
has a Cognitive Complexity of 135 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def mssql_get_hash(arg = {})
ntlm_ver = arg[:ntlm_ver]
if ntlm_ver == NTLM_CONST::NTLM_V1_RESPONSE or ntlm_ver == NTLM_CONST::NTLM_2_SESSION_RESPONSE
lm_hash = arg[:lm_hash]
nt_hash = arg[:nt_hash]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File mssql.rb
has 470 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
NTLM_CONST = Rex::Proto::NTLM::Constants
NTLM_CRYPT = Rex::Proto::NTLM::Crypt
NTLM_UTILS = Rex::Proto::NTLM::Utils
MESSAGE = Rex::Proto::NTLM::Message
Method mssql_get_hash
has 167 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def mssql_get_hash(arg = {})
ntlm_ver = arg[:ntlm_ver]
if ntlm_ver == NTLM_CONST::NTLM_V1_RESPONSE or ntlm_ver == NTLM_CONST::NTLM_2_SESSION_RESPONSE
lm_hash = arg[:lm_hash]
nt_hash = arg[:nt_hash]
Method mssql_parse_ntlmsspi
has 47 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def mssql_parse_ntlmsspi(data, info)
start = data.index('NTLMSSP')
if start
data.slice!(0,start)
else
Method mssql_parse_ntlmsspi
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def mssql_parse_ntlmsspi(data, info)
start = data.index('NTLMSSP')
if start
data.slice!(0,start)
else
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method mssql_parse_login
has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def mssql_parse_login(data, info)
status = data.slice!(0,1).unpack('C')[0]
len = data.slice!(0,2).unpack('n')[0]
if len > data.length + 4
Method on_client_data
has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def on_client_data(c)
info = {:errors => [], :ip => @state[c][:ip]}
data = c.get_once
return if not data
Method mssql_send_ntlm_challenge
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def mssql_send_ntlm_challenge(c, info)
win_domain = Rex::Text.to_unicode(@domain_name.upcase)
win_name = Rex::Text.to_unicode(@domain_name.upcase)
dns_domain = Rex::Text.to_unicode(@domain_name.downcase)
dns_name = Rex::Text.to_unicode(@domain_name.downcase)
Method initialize
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize
super(
'Name' => 'Authentication Capture: MSSQL',
'Description' => %q{
This module provides a fake MSSQL service that
Method on_client_data
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def on_client_data(c)
info = {:errors => [], :ip => @state[c][:ip]}
data = c.get_once
return if not data
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method mssql_parse_login
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def mssql_parse_login(data, info)
status = data.slice!(0,1).unpack('C')[0]
len = data.slice!(0,2).unpack('n')[0]
if len > data.length + 4
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method mssql_parse_reply
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def mssql_parse_reply(data, info)
info[:errors] = []
return if not data
until data.empty? or ( info[:errors] and not info[:errors].empty? )
token = data.slice!(0,1).unpack('C')[0]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
case ntlm_ver
when NTLM_CONST::NTLM_V1_RESPONSE
if NTLM_CRYPT::is_hash_from_empty_pwd?({:hash => [nt_hash].pack("H*"),:srv_challenge => @challenge,
:ntlm_ver => NTLM_CONST::NTLM_V1_RESPONSE, :type => 'ntlm' })
print_status("NLMv1 Hash correspond to an empty password, ignoring ... ")
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 196.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if(datastore['JOHNPWFILE'] and user)
case ntlm_ver
when NTLM_CONST::NTLM_V1_RESPONSE, NTLM_CONST::NTLM_2_SESSION_RESPONSE
fd = File.open(datastore['JOHNPWFILE'] + '_netntlm', "ab")
fd.puts(
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 144.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if(datastore['CAINPWFILE'] and user)
if ntlm_ver == NTLM_CONST::NTLM_V1_RESPONSE or ntlm_ver == NTLM_CONST::NTLM_2_SESSION_RESPONSE
fd = File.open(datastore['CAINPWFILE'], "ab")
fd.puts(
[
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 56.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
capturelogmessage =
"#{capturedtime}\nNTLMv2 Response Captured from #{host} \n" +
"DOMAIN: #{domain} USER: #{user} \n" +
"LMHASH:#{lm_hash_message ? lm_hash_message : "<NULL>"} " +
"LM_CLIENT_CHALLENGE:#{lm_chall_message ? lm_chall_message : "<NULL>"}\n" +
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 48.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if ntlm_ver == NTLM_CONST::NTLM_V1_RESPONSE or ntlm_ver == NTLM_CONST::NTLM_2_SESSION_RESPONSE
lm_hash = arg[:lm_hash]
nt_hash = arg[:nt_hash]
else
lm_hash = arg[:lm_hash]
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 36.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
capturelogmessage =
"#{capturedtime}\nNTLM2_SESSION Response Captured from #{host} \n" +
"DOMAIN: #{domain} USER: #{user} \n" +
"NTHASH:#{nt_hash ? nt_hash : "<NULL>"}\n" +
"NT_CLIENT_CHALLENGE:#{lm_hash_message ? lm_hash_message[0,16] : "<NULL>"} \n"
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 35.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
capturelogmessage =
"#{capturedtime}\nNTLMv1 Response Captured from #{host} \n" +
"DOMAIN: #{domain} USER: #{user} \n" +
"LMHASH:#{lm_hash_message ? lm_hash_message : "<NULL>"} \nNTHASH:#{nt_hash ? nt_hash : "<NULL>"}\n"
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 30.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76