Method process_openssl_cleartext_request
has a Cognitive Complexity of 37 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def process_openssl_cleartext_request(c, data)
message_type, message_version, protocol_version = data.unpack("Cn@9n")
if message_type == 0x15 and data.length >= 7
message_level, message_reason = data[5,2].unpack("CC")
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File openssl_heartbeat_client_memory.rb
has 397 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class MetasploitModule < Msf::Auxiliary
include Msf::Exploit::Remote::TcpServer
include Msf::Auxiliary::Report
def initialize
Class MetasploitModule
has 23 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class MetasploitModule < Msf::Auxiliary
include Msf::Exploit::Remote::TcpServer
include Msf::Auxiliary::Report
def initialize
Method process_openssl_cleartext_request
has 58 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def process_openssl_cleartext_request(c, data)
message_type, message_version, protocol_version = data.unpack("Cn@9n")
if message_type == 0x15 and data.length >= 7
message_level, message_reason = data[5,2].unpack("CC")
Method process_request
has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def process_request(c)
# Make this slightly harder to DoS
if @state[c][:buff].to_s.length > (1024*128)
print_status("#{@state[c][:name]} Buffer limit reached, dropping connection")
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method initialize
has 39 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize
super(
'Name' => 'OpenSSL Heartbeat (Heartbleed) Client Memory Exposure',
'Description' => %q{
This module provides a fake SSL service that is intended to
Method generate_certificate
has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def generate_certificate
key = @cert_key
cert = OpenSSL::X509::Certificate.new
cert.version = 2
cert.serial = rand(0xFFFFFFFF)
Method tls1_calculate_crypto_keys
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def tls1_calculate_crypto_keys(c)
@state[c][:master] = tls1_calculate_master_key(c)
return unless @state[c][:master]
key_block = tls1_prf(
Method openssl_send_server_hello
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def openssl_send_server_hello(c, hello, version)
# If encrypted, use the TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA; otherwise, use the
# first cipher suite sent by the client.
if @state[c][:encrypted]
Method store_captured_heartbeats
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def store_captured_heartbeats(c)
if @state[c][:heartbeats].length > 0
begin
path = store_loot(
"openssl.heartbleed.client",
Method process_openssl_encrypted_request
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def process_openssl_encrypted_request(c, data)
message_type, message_version, protocol_version = data.unpack("Cn@9n")
return if @state[c][:shutdown]
return unless data.length > 5
Method process_openssl_encrypted_request
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def process_openssl_encrypted_request(c, data)
message_type, message_version, protocol_version = data.unpack("Cn@9n")
return if @state[c][:shutdown]
return unless data.length > 5
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if @state[c][:heartbeats].length >= heartbeat_limit
print_status("#{@state[c][:name]} Encrypted heartbeats received [#{@state[c][:heartbeats].length} bytes total]")
store_captured_heartbeats(c)
c.close()
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 31.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if @state[c][:heartbeats].length >= heartbeat_limit
print_status("#{@state[c][:name]} Heartbeats received [#{@state[c][:heartbeats].length} bytes total]")
store_captured_heartbeats(c)
c.close()
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 31.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76