rapid7/metasploit-framework

View on GitHub
modules/exploits/linux/http/glinet_unauth_rce_cve_2023_50445.rb

Summary

Maintainability
D
2 days
Test Coverage

Method initialize has 84 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def initialize(info = {})
    super(
      update_info(
        info,
        'Name' => 'GL.iNet Unauthenticated Remote Command Execution via the logread module.',
Severity: Major
Found in modules/exploits/linux/http/glinet_unauth_rce_cve_2023_50445.rb - About 3 hrs to fix

    Method vuln_version? has 75 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

      def vuln_version?
        @glinet = { 'model' => nil, 'firmware' => nil, 'arch' => nil }
        # check first with version 4.x api call
        post_data = {
          jsonrpc: '2.0',
    Severity: Major
    Found in modules/exploits/linux/http/glinet_unauth_rce_cve_2023_50445.rb - About 3 hrs to fix

      File glinet_unauth_rce_cve_2023_50445.rb has 270 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

      require 'digest/md5'
      
      class MetasploitModule < Msf::Exploit::Remote
        Rank = ExcellentRanking
      
      
      Severity: Minor
      Found in modules/exploits/linux/http/glinet_unauth_rce_cve_2023_50445.rb - About 2 hrs to fix

        Method auth_bypass has 50 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

          def auth_bypass
            # Check if datastore['SID'] is set
            return datastore['SID'] unless datastore['SID'].blank?
        
            # Exploit CVE-2023-50919 to retrieve the SID without valid username and password.
        Severity: Minor
        Found in modules/exploits/linux/http/glinet_unauth_rce_cve_2023_50445.rb - About 2 hrs to fix

          Method vuln_version? has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

            def vuln_version?
              @glinet = { 'model' => nil, 'firmware' => nil, 'arch' => nil }
              # check first with version 4.x api call
              post_data = {
                jsonrpc: '2.0',
          Severity: Minor
          Found in modules/exploits/linux/http/glinet_unauth_rce_cve_2023_50445.rb - About 1 hr to fix

          Cognitive Complexity

          Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

          A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

          • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
          • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
          • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

          Further reading

          Method auth_bypass has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

            def auth_bypass
              # Check if datastore['SID'] is set
              return datastore['SID'] unless datastore['SID'].blank?
          
              # Exploit CVE-2023-50919 to retrieve the SID without valid username and password.
          Severity: Minor
          Found in modules/exploits/linux/http/glinet_unauth_rce_cve_2023_50445.rb - About 1 hr to fix

          Cognitive Complexity

          Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

          A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

          • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
          • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
          • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

          Further reading

          Method check has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

            def check
              print_status("Checking if #{peer} can be exploited.")
              # Check if target is a GL.iNet network device and the firmware version is vulnerable
              return CheckCode::Vulnerable("Product info: #{@glinet['model']}|#{@glinet['firmware']}|#{@glinet['arch']}") if vuln_version?
          
          
          Severity: Minor
          Found in modules/exploits/linux/http/glinet_unauth_rce_cve_2023_50445.rb - About 1 hr to fix

          Cognitive Complexity

          Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

          A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

          • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
          • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
          • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

          Further reading

          Avoid too many return statements within this method.
          Open

                return Rex::Version.new(@glinet['firmware']) >= Rex::Version.new('4.0.0') && Rex::Version.new(@glinet['firmware']) <= Rex::Version.new('4.4.2')
          Severity: Major
          Found in modules/exploits/linux/http/glinet_unauth_rce_cve_2023_50445.rb - About 30 mins to fix

            Avoid too many return statements within this method.
            Open

                  return Rex::Version.new(@glinet['firmware']) >= Rex::Version.new('4.0.0') && Rex::Version.new(@glinet['firmware']) < Rex::Version.new('4.5.0')
            Severity: Major
            Found in modules/exploits/linux/http/glinet_unauth_rce_cve_2023_50445.rb - About 30 mins to fix

              Avoid too many return statements within this method.
              Open

                    return Rex::Version.new(@glinet['firmware']) == Rex::Version.new('4.3.8')
              Severity: Major
              Found in modules/exploits/linux/http/glinet_unauth_rce_cve_2023_50445.rb - About 30 mins to fix

                Avoid too many return statements within this method.
                Open

                      return Rex::Version.new(@glinet['firmware']) >= Rex::Version.new('4.5.0') && Rex::Version.new(@glinet['firmware']) <= Rex::Version.new('4.5.3')
                Severity: Major
                Found in modules/exploits/linux/http/glinet_unauth_rce_cve_2023_50445.rb - About 30 mins to fix

                  Avoid too many return statements within this method.
                  Open

                        return Rex::Version.new(@glinet['firmware']) == Rex::Version.new('4.3.8')
                  Severity: Major
                  Found in modules/exploits/linux/http/glinet_unauth_rce_cve_2023_50445.rb - About 30 mins to fix

                    Avoid too many return statements within this method.
                    Open

                          return Rex::Version.new(@glinet['firmware']) >= Rex::Version.new('4.0.0') && Rex::Version.new(@glinet['firmware']) < Rex::Version.new('4.5.0')
                    Severity: Major
                    Found in modules/exploits/linux/http/glinet_unauth_rce_cve_2023_50445.rb - About 30 mins to fix

                      Avoid too many return statements within this method.
                      Open

                          return false
                      Severity: Major
                      Found in modules/exploits/linux/http/glinet_unauth_rce_cve_2023_50445.rb - About 30 mins to fix

                        Avoid too many return statements within this method.
                        Open

                              return Rex::Version.new(@glinet['firmware']) >= Rex::Version.new('4.0.0') && Rex::Version.new(@glinet['firmware']) <= Rex::Version.new('4.4.3')
                        Severity: Major
                        Found in modules/exploits/linux/http/glinet_unauth_rce_cve_2023_50445.rb - About 30 mins to fix

                          Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                          Open

                              when 'ax1800', 'axt1800', 'a1300'
                                @glinet['arch'] = 'armle'
                                return Rex::Version.new(@glinet['firmware']) >= Rex::Version.new('4.0.0') && Rex::Version.new(@glinet['firmware']) < Rex::Version.new('4.5.0')
                              when 'mt2500', 'mt2500a', 'mt3000'
                          Severity: Minor
                          Found in modules/exploits/linux/http/glinet_unauth_rce_cve_2023_50445.rb and 1 other location - About 30 mins to fix
                          modules/exploits/linux/http/glinet_unauth_rce_cve_2023_50445.rb on lines 171..174

                          Duplicated Code

                          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                          Tuning

                          This issue has a mass of 33.

                          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                          Refactorings

                          Further Reading

                          Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                          Open

                              when 'mt2500', 'mt2500a', 'mt3000'
                                @glinet['arch'] = 'aarch64'
                                return Rex::Version.new(@glinet['firmware']) >= Rex::Version.new('4.0.0') && Rex::Version.new(@glinet['firmware']) < Rex::Version.new('4.5.0')
                              when 'mt6000'
                          Severity: Minor
                          Found in modules/exploits/linux/http/glinet_unauth_rce_cve_2023_50445.rb and 1 other location - About 30 mins to fix
                          modules/exploits/linux/http/glinet_unauth_rce_cve_2023_50445.rb on lines 168..171

                          Duplicated Code

                          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                          Tuning

                          This issue has a mass of 33.

                          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                          Refactorings

                          Further Reading

                          Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
                          Open

                              when 'x3000'
                                @glinet['arch'] = 'aarch64'
                                return Rex::Version.new(@glinet['firmware']) >= Rex::Version.new('4.0.0') && Rex::Version.new(@glinet['firmware']) <= Rex::Version.new('4.4.2')
                              when 'xe3000'
                          modules/exploits/linux/http/glinet_unauth_rce_cve_2023_50445.rb on lines 174..177
                          modules/exploits/linux/http/glinet_unauth_rce_cve_2023_50445.rb on lines 180..183

                          Duplicated Code

                          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                          Tuning

                          This issue has a mass of 31.

                          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                          Refactorings

                          Further Reading

                          Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
                          Open

                              when 'mt6000'
                                @glinet['arch'] = 'aarch64'
                                return Rex::Version.new(@glinet['firmware']) >= Rex::Version.new('4.5.0') && Rex::Version.new(@glinet['firmware']) <= Rex::Version.new('4.5.3')
                              when 'x3000'
                          modules/exploits/linux/http/glinet_unauth_rce_cve_2023_50445.rb on lines 177..180
                          modules/exploits/linux/http/glinet_unauth_rce_cve_2023_50445.rb on lines 180..183

                          Duplicated Code

                          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                          Tuning

                          This issue has a mass of 31.

                          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                          Refactorings

                          Further Reading

                          Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
                          Open

                              when 'xe3000'
                                @glinet['arch'] = 'aarch64'
                                return Rex::Version.new(@glinet['firmware']) >= Rex::Version.new('4.0.0') && Rex::Version.new(@glinet['firmware']) <= Rex::Version.new('4.4.3')
                              end
                          modules/exploits/linux/http/glinet_unauth_rce_cve_2023_50445.rb on lines 174..177
                          modules/exploits/linux/http/glinet_unauth_rce_cve_2023_50445.rb on lines 177..180

                          Duplicated Code

                          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                          Tuning

                          This issue has a mass of 31.

                          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                          Refactorings

                          Further Reading

                          Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                          Open

                                return CheckCode::Detected("Product info: #{@glinet['model']}|#{@glinet['firmware']}|#{@glinet['arch']}") if Rex::Version.new(@glinet['firmware']) >= Rex::Version.new('4.0.0')
                          Severity: Minor
                          Found in modules/exploits/linux/http/glinet_unauth_rce_cve_2023_50445.rb and 1 other location - About 25 mins to fix
                          modules/exploits/linux/http/glinet_unauth_rce_cve_2023_50445.rb on lines 287..287

                          Duplicated Code

                          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                          Tuning

                          This issue has a mass of 30.

                          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                          Refactorings

                          Further Reading

                          Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                          Open

                                return CheckCode::Safe("Product info: #{@glinet['model']}|#{@glinet['firmware']}|#{@glinet['arch']}") if Rex::Version.new(@glinet['firmware']) < Rex::Version.new('4.0.0')
                          Severity: Minor
                          Found in modules/exploits/linux/http/glinet_unauth_rce_cve_2023_50445.rb and 1 other location - About 25 mins to fix
                          modules/exploits/linux/http/glinet_unauth_rce_cve_2023_50445.rb on lines 293..293

                          Duplicated Code

                          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                          Tuning

                          This issue has a mass of 30.

                          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                          Refactorings

                          Further Reading

                          Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                          Open

                              if res && res.code == 200 && res.body.include?('nonce')
                                res_json = res.get_json_document
                                unless res_json.blank?
                                  nonce = res_json['result']['nonce']
                                end
                          Severity: Minor
                          Found in modules/exploits/linux/http/glinet_unauth_rce_cve_2023_50445.rb and 1 other location - About 25 mins to fix
                          modules/exploits/linux/http/glinet_unauth_rce_cve_2023_50445.rb on lines 242..249

                          Duplicated Code

                          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                          Tuning

                          This issue has a mass of 29.

                          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                          Refactorings

                          Further Reading

                          Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                          Open

                              if res && res.code == 200 && res.body.include?('sid')
                                res_json = res.get_json_document
                                unless res_json.blank?
                                  sid = res_json['result']['sid']
                                end
                          Severity: Minor
                          Found in modules/exploits/linux/http/glinet_unauth_rce_cve_2023_50445.rb and 1 other location - About 25 mins to fix
                          modules/exploits/linux/http/glinet_unauth_rce_cve_2023_50445.rb on lines 210..217

                          Duplicated Code

                          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                          Tuning

                          This issue has a mass of 29.

                          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                          Refactorings

                          Further Reading

                          There are no issues that match your filters.

                          Category
                          Status