File kibana_upgrade_assistant_telemetry_rce.rb
has 325 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class MetasploitModule < Msf::Exploit::Remote
Rank = ManualRanking # causes service to not respond until cleanup and reboot
include Msf::Exploit::Remote::HttpClient
# decided not to use autocheck since it doesn't work for both targets
Method mapping_data
has 73 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def mapping_data
{
'properties' => {
'upgrade-assistant-telemetry' => {
'properties' => {
Method initialize
has 53 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize(info = {})
super(
update_info(
info,
'Name' => 'Kibana Upgrade Assistant Telemetry Collector Prototype Pollution',
Method execute_command
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def execute_command
case target.name
when 'ELASTIC'
request = {
'uri' => normalize_uri(target_uri.path, '.kibana_1', '_doc', 'upgrade-assistant-telemetry:upgrade-assistant-telemetry'),
Method check
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def check
if target == targets[0] # elastic
return CheckCode::Unknown('Unable to determine Kibana version from Elastic database')
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method exploit
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def exploit
@clean = true
fail_with(Failure::BadConfig, 'A password has been defined without a username') if datastore['USERNAME'].blank? && !datastore['PASSWORD'].blank?
case target.name
when 'ELASTIC'
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return CheckCode::Appears("Exploitable Version Detected: #{@version}")
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return Exploit::CheckCode::Safe("#{peer} - Unexpected response, unable to determine version") if json_body['version'].nil?
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return Exploit::CheckCode::Safe("#{peer} - Unexpected response, unable to determine version")
Method execute_command
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def execute_command
case target.name
when 'ELASTIC'
request = {
'uri' => normalize_uri(target_uri.path, '.kibana_1', '_doc', 'upgrade-assistant-telemetry:upgrade-assistant-telemetry'),
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
register_options(
[
Opt::RPORT(9200), # default to elastic port, kibana is 5601
OptString.new('USERNAME', [ false, 'Elastic User to login with', '']),
OptString.new('PASSWORD', [ false, 'Elastic Password to login with', '']),
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 26.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76