rapid7/metasploit-framework

View on GitHub
modules/exploits/linux/local/af_packet_packet_set_ring_priv_esc.rb

Summary

Maintainability
C
1 day
Test Coverage

Method initialize has 59 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def initialize(info = {})
    super(update_info(info,
      'Name'           => 'AF_PACKET packet_set_ring Privilege Escalation',
      'Description'    => %q{
        This module exploits a heap-out-of-bounds write in the packet_set_ring
Severity: Major
Found in modules/exploits/linux/local/af_packet_packet_set_ring_priv_esc.rb - About 2 hrs to fix

    Method check has 44 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

      def check
        version = kernel_release
        unless version =~ /^4\.8\.0-(34|36|39|41|42|44|45)-generic/
          vprint_error "Linux kernel version #{version} is not vulnerable"
          return CheckCode::Safe
    Severity: Minor
    Found in modules/exploits/linux/local/af_packet_packet_set_ring_priv_esc.rb - About 1 hr to fix

      Method check has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

        def check
          version = kernel_release
          unless version =~ /^4\.8\.0-(34|36|39|41|42|44|45)-generic/
            vprint_error "Linux kernel version #{version} is not vulnerable"
            return CheckCode::Safe
      Severity: Minor
      Found in modules/exploits/linux/local/af_packet_packet_set_ring_priv_esc.rb - About 1 hr to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Method exploit has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

        def exploit
          if !datastore['ForceExploit'] && is_root?
            fail_with(Failure::BadConfig, 'Session already has root privileges. Set ForceExploit to override.')
          end
      
      
      Severity: Minor
      Found in modules/exploits/linux/local/af_packet_packet_set_ring_priv_esc.rb - About 1 hr to fix

        Avoid too many return statements within this method.
        Open

              return CheckCode::Safe
        Severity: Major
        Found in modules/exploits/linux/local/af_packet_packet_set_ring_priv_esc.rb - About 30 mins to fix

          Avoid too many return statements within this method.
          Open

                return CheckCode::Safe
          Severity: Major
          Found in modules/exploits/linux/local/af_packet_packet_set_ring_priv_esc.rb - About 30 mins to fix

            Avoid too many return statements within this method.
            Open

                  return CheckCode::Safe
            Severity: Major
            Found in modules/exploits/linux/local/af_packet_packet_set_ring_priv_esc.rb - About 30 mins to fix

              Avoid too many return statements within this method.
              Open

                    return CheckCode::Safe
              Severity: Major
              Found in modules/exploits/linux/local/af_packet_packet_set_ring_priv_esc.rb - About 30 mins to fix

                Method live_compile? has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                Open

                  def live_compile?
                    return false unless datastore['COMPILE'].eql?('Auto') || datastore['COMPILE'].eql?('True')
                
                    if has_gcc?
                      vprint_good 'gcc is installed'
                Severity: Minor
                Found in modules/exploits/linux/local/af_packet_packet_set_ring_priv_esc.rb - About 25 mins to fix

                Cognitive Complexity

                Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

                A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

                • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
                • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
                • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

                Further reading

                Method exploit has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                Open

                  def exploit
                    if !datastore['ForceExploit'] && is_root?
                      fail_with(Failure::BadConfig, 'Session already has root privileges. Set ForceExploit to override.')
                    end
                
                
                Severity: Minor
                Found in modules/exploits/linux/local/af_packet_packet_set_ring_priv_esc.rb - About 25 mins to fix

                Cognitive Complexity

                Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

                A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

                • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
                • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
                • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

                Further reading

                Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                Open

                  def upload_and_compile(path, data)
                    upload "#{path}.c", data
                    gcc_cmd = "gcc -o #{path} #{path}.c"
                    if session.type.eql? 'shell'
                      gcc_cmd = "PATH=$PATH:/usr/bin/ #{gcc_cmd}"
                modules/exploits/linux/local/recvmmsg_priv_esc.rb on lines 76..89

                Duplicated Code

                Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                Tuning

                This issue has a mass of 45.

                We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                Refactorings

                Further Reading

                Identical blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring.
                Open

                  def live_compile?
                    return false unless datastore['COMPILE'].eql?('Auto') || datastore['COMPILE'].eql?('True')
                
                    if has_gcc?
                      vprint_good 'gcc is installed'
                modules/exploits/linux/local/glibc_realpath_priv_esc.rb on lines 120..129
                modules/exploits/linux/local/nested_namespace_idmap_limit_priv_esc.rb on lines 138..147
                modules/exploits/linux/local/recvmmsg_priv_esc.rb on lines 100..109
                modules/exploits/linux/local/ufo_privilege_escalation.rb on lines 124..133

                Duplicated Code

                Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                Tuning

                This issue has a mass of 33.

                We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                Refactorings

                Further Reading

                Similar blocks of code found in 31 locations. Consider refactoring.
                Open

                          [ 'EDB', '41994' ],
                          [ 'CVE', '2017-7308' ],
                          [ 'BID', '97234' ],
                          [ 'URL', 'https://googleprojectzero.blogspot.com/2017/05/exploiting-linux-kernel-via-packet.html' ],
                          [ 'URL', 'https://www.coresecurity.com/blog/solving-post-exploitation-issue-cve-2017-7308' ],
                modules/auxiliary/admin/http/cisco_ios_xe_os_exec_cve_2023_20273.rb on lines 54..65
                modules/auxiliary/dos/windows/rdp/ms12_020_maxchannelids.rb on lines 22..29
                modules/auxiliary/scanner/ssh/ssh_enumusers.rb on lines 37..44
                modules/exploits/android/browser/stagefright_mp4_tx3g_64bit.rb on lines 53..61
                modules/exploits/freebsd/local/ip6_setpktopt_uaf_priv_esc.rb on lines 48..55
                modules/exploits/linux/http/fritzbox_echo_exec.rb on lines 31..38
                modules/exploits/linux/http/klog_server_authenticate_user_unauth_command_injection.rb on lines 40..47
                modules/exploits/linux/http/vmware_vcenter_vsan_health_rce.rb on lines 32..40
                modules/exploits/linux/local/blueman_set_dhcp_handler_dbus_priv_esc.rb on lines 39..46
                modules/exploits/linux/local/ptrace_sudo_token_priv_esc.rb on lines 43..50
                modules/exploits/linux/local/rds_rds_page_copy_user_priv_esc.rb on lines 48..55
                modules/exploits/linux/local/servu_ftp_server_prepareinstallation_priv_esc.rb on lines 41..48
                modules/exploits/linux/local/sudoedit_bypass_priv_esc.rb on lines 47..54
                modules/exploits/multi/browser/java_atomicreferencearray.rb on lines 35..42
                modules/exploits/multi/browser/java_jre17_jmxbean_2.rb on lines 35..42
                modules/exploits/multi/browser/java_verifier_field_access.rb on lines 35..42
                modules/exploits/multi/http/hp_sitescope_uploadfileshandler.rb on lines 34..41
                modules/exploits/multi/http/struts2_multi_eval_ognl.rb on lines 33..40
                modules/exploits/multi/http/vmware_vcenter_uploadova_rce.rb on lines 43..50
                modules/exploits/unix/dhcp/rhel_dhcp_client_command_injection.rb on lines 35..42
                modules/exploits/unix/fileformat/imagemagick_delegate.rb on lines 39..46
                modules/exploits/unix/webapp/vicidial_manager_send_cmd_exec.rb on lines 37..44
                modules/exploits/windows/browser/adobe_flash_otf_font.rb on lines 34..41
                modules/exploits/windows/browser/adobe_flash_regex_value.rb on lines 33..40
                modules/exploits/windows/browser/adobe_flashplayer_flash10o.rb on lines 30..37
                modules/exploits/windows/browser/java_docbase_bof.rb on lines 46..53
                modules/exploits/windows/browser/mozilla_firefox_onreadystatechange.rb on lines 32..39
                modules/exploits/windows/browser/ms06_013_createtextrange.rb on lines 34..41
                modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/winamp_maki_bof.rb on lines 33..40
                modules/exploits/windows/local/ms15_078_atmfd_bof.rb on lines 64..71

                Duplicated Code

                Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                Tuning

                This issue has a mass of 25.

                We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                Refactorings

                Further Reading

                There are no issues that match your filters.

                Category
                Status