rapid7/metasploit-framework

View on GitHub
modules/exploits/multi/http/wp_plugin_fma_shortcode_unauth_rce.rb

Summary

Maintainability
D
2 days
Test Coverage

Method initialize has 111 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def initialize(info = {})
    super(
      update_info(
        info,
        'Name' => 'Wordpress File Manager Advanced Shortcode 2.3.2 - Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution through shortcode',
Severity: Major
Found in modules/exploits/multi/http/wp_plugin_fma_shortcode_unauth_rce.rb - About 4 hrs to fix

    Method upload_webshell has a Cognitive Complexity of 20 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

      def upload_webshell
        # randomize file name if option WEBSHELL is not set
        @webshell_name = (datastore['WEBSHELL'].blank? ? "#{Rex::Text.rand_text_alpha(8..16)}.php" : datastore['WEBSHELL'].to_s)
    
        @post_param = Rex::Text.rand_text_alphanumeric(1..8)
    Severity: Minor
    Found in modules/exploits/multi/http/wp_plugin_fma_shortcode_unauth_rce.rb - About 2 hrs to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    File wp_plugin_fma_shortcode_unauth_rce.rb has 257 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    class MetasploitModule < Msf::Exploit::Remote
      Rank = ExcellentRanking
    
      include Msf::Exploit::Remote::HttpClient
      include Msf::Exploit::CmdStager
    Severity: Minor
    Found in modules/exploits/multi/http/wp_plugin_fma_shortcode_unauth_rce.rb - About 2 hrs to fix

      Method check_fma_shortcode_plugin has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

        def check_fma_shortcode_plugin
          # check if fma shortcode plugin is installed and return fmakey, upload directory path and Wordpress base url
          @wp_data = {}
          res = send_request_cgi!({
            'method' => 'GET',
      Severity: Minor
      Found in modules/exploits/multi/http/wp_plugin_fma_shortcode_unauth_rce.rb - About 1 hr to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Method upload_webshell has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

        def upload_webshell
          # randomize file name if option WEBSHELL is not set
          @webshell_name = (datastore['WEBSHELL'].blank? ? "#{Rex::Text.rand_text_alpha(8..16)}.php" : datastore['WEBSHELL'].to_s)
      
          @post_param = Rex::Text.rand_text_alphanumeric(1..8)
      Severity: Minor
      Found in modules/exploits/multi/http/wp_plugin_fma_shortcode_unauth_rce.rb - About 1 hr to fix

        Method check_fma_shortcode_plugin has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

          def check_fma_shortcode_plugin
            # check if fma shortcode plugin is installed and return fmakey, upload directory path and Wordpress base url
            @wp_data = {}
            res = send_request_cgi!({
              'method' => 'GET',
        Severity: Minor
        Found in modules/exploits/multi/http/wp_plugin_fma_shortcode_unauth_rce.rb - About 1 hr to fix

          Avoid too many return statements within this method.
          Open

                  return false
          Severity: Major
          Found in modules/exploits/multi/http/wp_plugin_fma_shortcode_unauth_rce.rb - About 30 mins to fix

            Method exploit has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
            Open

              def exploit
                # check if fmakey is already set from the check method otherwise try to find the key.
                check_fma_shortcode_plugin unless datastore['AutoCheck']
                fail_with(Failure::NotVulnerable, "Could not find fmakey. Shortcode plugin not installed or check your TARGETURI \"#{datastore['TARGETURI']}\" setting.") if @wp_data['fmakey'].nil?
            
            
            Severity: Minor
            Found in modules/exploits/multi/http/wp_plugin_fma_shortcode_unauth_rce.rb - About 25 mins to fix

            Cognitive Complexity

            Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

            A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

            • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
            • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
            • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

            Further reading

            Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
            Open

                  if path_match1
                    @wp_data['path'] = path_match1[0].split(',')[0].split(':')[1].tr('\'', '').strip
                  else
                    @wp_data['path'] = path_match2[0].split(',')[0].split(':')[1].tr('"', '').strip
            modules/exploits/multi/http/wp_plugin_fma_shortcode_unauth_rce.rb on lines 247..250

            Duplicated Code

            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

            Tuning

            This issue has a mass of 38.

            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

            Refactorings

            Further Reading

            Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
            Open

                  if fmakey_match1
                    @wp_data['fmakey'] = fmakey_match1[0].split(',')[0].split(':')[1].tr('\'', '').strip
                  else
                    @wp_data['fmakey'] = fmakey_match2[0].split(',')[0].split(':')[1].tr('"', '').strip
            modules/exploits/multi/http/wp_plugin_fma_shortcode_unauth_rce.rb on lines 259..262

            Duplicated Code

            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

            Tuning

            This issue has a mass of 38.

            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

            Refactorings

            Further Reading

            Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
            Open

                register_options(
                  [
                    OptString.new('TARGETURI', [true, 'File Manager Advanced (FMA) Shortcode URI path', '/']),
                    OptString.new('WEBSHELL', [
                      false, 'The name of the webshell with extension php. Webshell name will be randomly generated if left unset.', nil
            modules/exploits/linux/http/artica_proxy_unauth_rce_cve_2024_2054.rb on lines 88..93
            modules/exploits/linux/http/terramaster_unauth_rce_cve_2020_35665.rb on lines 91..96
            modules/exploits/multi/http/gambio_unauth_rce_cve_2024_23759.rb on lines 83..88

            Duplicated Code

            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

            Tuning

            This issue has a mass of 34.

            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

            Refactorings

            Further Reading

            Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
            Open

                case target['Type']
                when :php
                  execute_php(payload.encoded)
                when :unix_cmd, :windows_cmd
                  execute_command(payload.encoded)
            modules/exploits/multi/http/gibbon_auth_rce_cve_2024_24725.rb on lines 240..248

            Duplicated Code

            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

            Tuning

            This issue has a mass of 28.

            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

            Refactorings

            Further Reading

            There are no issues that match your filters.

            Category
            Status