rapid7/metasploit-framework

View on GitHub
modules/exploits/unix/http/epmp1000_ping_cmd_shell.rb

Summary

Maintainability
D
1 day
Test Coverage

Method login has 72 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def login(user, pass)
    res = send_request_cgi(
      {
        'uri' => '/cgi-bin/luci',
        'method' => 'POST',
Severity: Major
Found in modules/exploits/unix/http/epmp1000_ping_cmd_shell.rb - About 2 hrs to fix

    Method initialize has 41 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

      def initialize(info = {})
        super(update_info(info,
          'Name' => "Cambium ePMP1000 'ping' Shell via Command Injection (up to v2.5)",
          'Description' => %{
              This module exploits an OS Command Injection vulnerability in Cambium
    Severity: Minor
    Found in modules/exploits/unix/http/epmp1000_ping_cmd_shell.rb - About 1 hr to fix

      Method is_app_epmp1000? has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

        def is_app_epmp1000?
          begin
            res = send_request_cgi(
              {
                'uri'       => '/',
      Severity: Minor
      Found in modules/exploits/unix/http/epmp1000_ping_cmd_shell.rb - About 1 hr to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Method is_app_epmp1000? has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

        def is_app_epmp1000?
          begin
            res = send_request_cgi(
              {
                'uri'       => '/',
      Severity: Minor
      Found in modules/exploits/unix/http/epmp1000_ping_cmd_shell.rb - About 1 hr to fix

        Method cmd_shell has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

          def cmd_shell(config_uri, cookie)
            command = payload.encoded
            inject = '|' + "#{command}" + ' ||'
            clean_inject = CGI.unescapeHTML(inject.to_s)
        
        
        Severity: Minor
        Found in modules/exploits/unix/http/epmp1000_ping_cmd_shell.rb - About 1 hr to fix

          Method login has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

            def login(user, pass)
              res = send_request_cgi(
                {
                  'uri' => '/cgi-bin/luci',
                  'method' => 'POST',
          Severity: Minor
          Found in modules/exploits/unix/http/epmp1000_ping_cmd_shell.rb - About 55 mins to fix

          Cognitive Complexity

          Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

          A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

          • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
          • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
          • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

          Further reading

          Method exploit has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

            def exploit
              success, epmp_ver = is_app_epmp1000?
              if epmp_ver < '2.5'
                cookie, config_uri_ping = login(datastore['USERNAME'], datastore['PASSWORD'])
                if cookie == 'skip' && config_uri_ping == 'skip'
          Severity: Minor
          Found in modules/exploits/unix/http/epmp1000_ping_cmd_shell.rb - About 25 mins to fix

          Cognitive Complexity

          Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

          A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

          • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
          • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
          • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

          Further reading

          Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

            def is_app_epmp1000?
              begin
                res = send_request_cgi(
                  {
                    'uri'       => '/',
          Severity: Major
          Found in modules/exploits/unix/http/epmp1000_ping_cmd_shell.rb and 1 other location - About 3 hrs to fix
          modules/exploits/unix/http/epmp1000_get_chart_cmd_shell.rb on lines 59..94

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 117.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

            def check
              success, epmp_ver = is_app_epmp1000?
              if (success != 'false' && !epmp_ver.nil? && epmp_ver < '2.5')
                return CheckCode::Vulnerable
              else
          Severity: Minor
          Found in modules/exploits/unix/http/epmp1000_ping_cmd_shell.rb and 1 other location - About 15 mins to fix
          modules/exploits/unix/http/epmp1000_get_chart_cmd_shell.rb on lines 101..107

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 26.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                cookie, config_uri_ping = login(datastore['USERNAME'], datastore['PASSWORD'])
                if cookie == 'skip' && config_uri_ping == 'skip'
                  return
                else
                  cmd_shell(config_uri_ping, cookie)
          Severity: Minor
          Found in modules/exploits/unix/http/epmp1000_ping_cmd_shell.rb and 1 other location - About 15 mins to fix
          modules/exploits/unix/http/epmp1000_get_chart_cmd_shell.rb on lines 244..249

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 25.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          There are no issues that match your filters.

          Category
          Status