rapid7/metasploit-framework

View on GitHub
modules/exploits/unix/webapp/wp_google_document_embedder_exec.rb

Summary

Maintainability
C
7 hrs
Test Coverage

Method exploit has 67 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def exploit
    uri = target_uri.path
    uri << '/' if uri[-1,1] != '/'
    plugins_uri = String.new(uri)
    plugins_uri << datastore['PLUGINSPATH']
Severity: Major
Found in modules/exploits/unix/webapp/wp_google_document_embedder_exec.rb - About 2 hrs to fix

    Method initialize has 43 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

      def initialize(info = {})
        super(update_info(info,
          'Name'           => 'WordPress Plugin Google Document Embedder Arbitrary File Disclosure',
          'Description'    => %q{
              This module exploits an arbitrary file disclosure flaw in the WordPress
    Severity: Minor
    Found in modules/exploits/unix/webapp/wp_google_document_embedder_exec.rb - About 1 hr to fix

      Method exploit has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

        def exploit
          uri = target_uri.path
          uri << '/' if uri[-1,1] != '/'
          plugins_uri = String.new(uri)
          plugins_uri << datastore['PLUGINSPATH']
      Severity: Minor
      Found in modules/exploits/unix/webapp/wp_google_document_embedder_exec.rb - About 1 hr to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Method parse_wp_config has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

        def parse_wp_config(body)
          p = store_loot('wordpress.config', 'text/plain', rhost, body, "#{rhost}_wp-config.php")
          print_good("wp-config.php saved in: #{p}")
          print_status("Parsing config file")
          values = {}
      Severity: Minor
      Found in modules/exploits/unix/webapp/wp_google_document_embedder_exec.rb - About 55 mins to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Method set_wp_theme has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

        def set_wp_theme(admin_uri, admin_cookie, nonce, theme, new_content)
      Severity: Minor
      Found in modules/exploits/unix/webapp/wp_google_document_embedder_exec.rb - About 35 mins to fix

        Similar blocks of code found in 17 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

            register_options(
              [
                OptString.new('TARGETURI', [true, 'The full URI path to WordPress', '/']),
                OptString.new('PLUGINSPATH', [true, 'The relative path to the plugins folder', 'wp-content/plugins/']),
                OptString.new('ADMINPATH', [true, 'The relative path to the admin folder', 'wp-admin/']),
        modules/auxiliary/admin/http/joomla_registration_privesc.rb on lines 35..41
        modules/auxiliary/admin/http/kaseya_master_admin.rb on lines 36..42
        modules/auxiliary/admin/http/vbulletin_upgrade_admin.rb on lines 35..41
        modules/auxiliary/gather/mantisbt_admin_sqli.rb on lines 33..39
        modules/auxiliary/scanner/http/riverbed_steelhead_vcx_file_read.rb on lines 31..37
        modules/auxiliary/scanner/sap/sap_soap_rfc_pfl_check_os_file_existence.rb on lines 51..56
        modules/auxiliary/scanner/sap/sap_soap_rfc_rzl_read_dir.rb on lines 51..56
        modules/auxiliary/scanner/telephony/wardial.rb on lines 48..54
        modules/exploits/linux/http/froxlor_log_path_rce.rb on lines 67..73
        modules/exploits/linux/http/seagate_nas_php_exec_noauth.rb on lines 48..53
        modules/exploits/windows/http/ajaxpro_deserialization_rce.rb on lines 91..96
        modules/exploits/windows/http/apache_activemq_traversal_upload.rb on lines 61..66
        modules/exploits/windows/http/manageengine_adaudit_plus_authenticated_rce.rb on lines 89..94
        modules/exploits/windows/http/sharepoint_data_deserialization.rb on lines 77..82
        modules/exploits/windows/http/zentao_pro_rce.rb on lines 74..79
        modules/post/osx/manage/mount_share.rb on lines 51..57

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 30.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        There are no issues that match your filters.

        Category
        Status