modules/exploits/windows/fileformat/ms10_087_rtf_pfragments_bof.rb
Method initialize
has 90 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Open
def initialize(info = {})
super(update_info(info,
'Name' => 'MS10-087 Microsoft Word RTF pFragments Stack Buffer Overflow (File Format)',
'Description' => %q{
This module exploits a stack-based buffer overflow in the handling of the
Method exploit
has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Open
def exploit
# Prepare a sample SEH frame and backward jmp for length calculations
seh = generate_seh_record(0xdeadbeef)
jmp_back = Metasm::Shellcode.assemble(Metasm::Ia32.new, "jmp $-0xffff").encode_string
Method exploit
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Open
def exploit
# Prepare a sample SEH frame and backward jmp for length calculations
seh = generate_seh_record(0xdeadbeef)
jmp_back = Metasm::Shellcode.assemble(Metasm::Ia32.new, "jmp $-0xffff").encode_string
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"