File ibm_was_dmgr_java_deserialization_rce.rb
has 444 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class MetasploitModule < Msf::Exploit::Remote
Rank = ExcellentRanking
include Msf::Exploit::Remote::Tcp
include Msf::Exploit::Powershell
include Msf::Exploit::EXE
Method build_tcp_node_msg
has 50 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def build_tcp_node_msg(obj, msg_type, source_ip, source_port, p2p_obj)
prng = Random.new
msg_id = prng.rand(4294967295)
# Create the field type for the origCell
Method initialize
has 45 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize(info = {})
super(update_info(info,
'Name' => 'IBM Websphere Application Server Network Deployment Untrusted Data Deserialization Remote Code Execution',
'Description' => %(
This module exploits untrusted serialized data processed by the WAS DMGR Server and Cells.
Method build_upfile_arg_class
has 44 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def build_upfile_arg_class(filename, bytes, cmd)
# Create the field ref
field_ref = Rex::Java::Serialization::Model::Reference.new
field_ref.handle = Rex::Java::Serialization::BASE_WIRE_HANDLE + 1
Method build_bcast_flood_msg
has 40 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def build_bcast_flood_msg(obj, msg_type, source_ip, source_port)
prng = Random.new
msg_id = prng.rand(4294967295)
# Create the field ref
Method build_app_node_class
has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def build_app_node_class(obj)
# Create the structured gateway field and add the reference
struct_bool_field = Rex::Java::Serialization::Model::Field.new
struct_bool_field.type = 'boolean'
struct_bool_field.name = Rex::Java::Serialization::Model::Utf.new(nil, 'structuredGateway')
Method build_bcast_run_task_msg
has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def build_bcast_run_task_msg(obj, msg_type, source_ip, source_port, upfile_arg_obj)
msg_obj = build_bcast_flood_msg(obj, msg_type, source_ip, source_port)
# Create the integer field and add the reference
out_int_field = Rex::Java::Serialization::Model::Field.new
Method build_p2p_node_class
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def build_p2p_node_class(obj)
msg_obj = build_app_node_class(obj)
# Create the field ref
field_ref = Rex::Java::Serialization::Model::Reference.new
Method build_properties_class
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def build_properties_class
# Create the object
object = Rex::Java::Serialization::Model::NewObject.new
object.class_desc = Rex::Java::Serialization::Model::ClassDesc.new
Method build_message
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def build_message(obj, msg_id, msg_type, orig_cell_field_type)
# Create the integer field and add the reference
id_field = Rex::Java::Serialization::Model::Field.new
id_field.type = 'int'
id_field.name = Rex::Java::Serialization::Model::Utf.new(nil, 'ID')
Method exploit
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def exploit
command = nil
if target.name == 'CMD'
fail_with(Failure::BadConfig, "#{rhost}:#{rport} - Only the cmd/generic payload is compatible") unless datastore['CMD']
Method build_tcp_node_msg
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def build_tcp_node_msg(obj, msg_type, source_ip, source_port, p2p_obj)
Method build_bcast_run_task_msg
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def build_bcast_run_task_msg(obj, msg_type, source_ip, source_port, upfile_arg_obj)
Method exploit
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def exploit
command = nil
if target.name == 'CMD'
fail_with(Failure::BadConfig, "#{rhost}:#{rport} - Only the cmd/generic payload is compatible") unless datastore['CMD']
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 7 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
register_options(
[
Opt::RPORT(11006), # 11002,11004,11006,etc
OptBool.new('SSL', [true, 'Negotiate SSL/TLS', true]),
OptRaw.new('SSLVersion', [true, 'Default Version for WASND ', 'SSLv3']),
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 33.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76