Method exploit
has a Cognitive Complexity of 35 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def exploit
# Generate the ASP containing the EXE containing the payload
exe = generate_payload_exe
asp = Msf::Util::EXE.to_exe_asp(exe)
path = datastore['PATH'].gsub('%RAND%', rand(0x10000000).to_s)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method exploit
has 101 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def exploit
# Generate the ASP containing the EXE containing the payload
exe = generate_payload_exe
asp = Msf::Util::EXE.to_exe_asp(exe)
path = datastore['PATH'].gsub('%RAND%', rand(0x10000000).to_s)
Method initialize
has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize
super(
'Name' => 'Microsoft IIS WebDAV Write Access Code Execution',
'Description' => %q{
This module can be used to execute a payload on IIS servers that
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return
Similar blocks of code found in 6 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (res.code < 200 or res.code >= 300)
# Changed this to a warning, because red is scary and if this part fails,
# honestly it's not that bad. In most cases this is probably expected anyway
# because by default we're using IWAM_*, which doesn't give us a lot of
# freedom to begin with.
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 25.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 6 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (res.code < 200 or res.code >= 300)
print_error("Upload failed on #{path_tmp} [#{res.code} #{res.message}]")
return
end
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 25.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76