rapid7/metasploit-framework

View on GitHub
modules/exploits/windows/local/cve_2020_0668_service_tracing.rb

Summary

Maintainability
C
1 day
Test Coverage

File cve_2020_0668_service_tracing.rb has 279 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

class MetasploitModule < Msf::Exploit::Local
  Rank = ExcellentRanking

  include Msf::Post::Common
  include Msf::Post::Windows::Priv
Severity: Minor
Found in modules/exploits/windows/local/cve_2020_0668_service_tracing.rb - About 2 hrs to fix

    Method initialize has 63 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

      def initialize(info = {})
        super(
          update_info(
            info,
            'Name' => 'Service Tracing Privilege Elevation Vulnerability',
    Severity: Major
    Found in modules/exploits/windows/local/cve_2020_0668_service_tracing.rb - About 2 hrs to fix

      Method rastapi_privileged_filecopy has 60 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

        def rastapi_privileged_filecopy(file_contents, exploit_dir, upload_payload_pathname, target_payload_pathname)
          handles = [] # stores open handles to cleanup properly
          reg_hash = create_reg_hash(file_contents.length - 1, exploit_dir)
          vprint_status("Registry hash = #{reg_hash}")
      
      
      Severity: Major
      Found in modules/exploits/windows/local/cve_2020_0668_service_tracing.rb - About 2 hrs to fix

        Method rastapi_privileged_filecopy has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

          def rastapi_privileged_filecopy(file_contents, exploit_dir, upload_payload_pathname, target_payload_pathname)
            handles = [] # stores open handles to cleanup properly
            reg_hash = create_reg_hash(file_contents.length - 1, exploit_dir)
            vprint_status("Registry hash = #{reg_hash}")
        
        
        Severity: Minor
        Found in modules/exploits/windows/local/cve_2020_0668_service_tracing.rb - About 55 mins to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

          def remove_reg_value(registry_hash)
            # we may have already deleted the key
            return unless registry_key_exist?(registry_hash[:key_name])
        
            begin
        modules/exploits/windows/local/bypassuac_dotnet_profiler.rb on lines 91..106

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 58.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        Identical blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

          def ensure_clean_destination(path)
            return unless file?(path)
        
            print_status("#{path} already exists on the target. Deleting...")
            begin
        modules/exploits/windows/local/comahawk.rb on lines 135..145
        modules/exploits/windows/local/cve_2020_1048_printerdemon.rb on lines 184..194
        modules/exploits/windows/local/cve_2020_1313_system_orchestrator.rb on lines 162..172

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 33.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

          def validate_active_host
            print_status("Attempting to PrivEsc on #{sysinfo['Computer']} via session ID: #{datastore['SESSION']}")
          rescue Rex::Post::Meterpreter::RequestError => e
            elog(e)
            raise Msf::Exploit::Failed, 'Could not connect to session'
        modules/exploits/windows/local/mov_ss.rb on lines 90..95
        modules/post/windows/escalate/unmarshal_cmd_exec.rb on lines 82..87

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 29.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

            if file?(target_payload_pathname)
              print_warning("#{target_payload_pathname} already exists")
              print_warning('If it is in use, the overwrite will fail')
              unless datastore['OVERWRITE_DLL']
                print_error('Change OVERWRITE_DLL option to true if you would like to proceed.')
        Severity: Minor
        Found in modules/exploits/windows/local/cve_2020_0668_service_tracing.rb and 1 other location - About 15 mins to fix
        modules/exploits/windows/local/cve_2020_0787_bits_arbitrary_file_move.rb on lines 175..180

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 25.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        There are no issues that match your filters.

        Category
        Status