Method check
has a Cognitive Complexity of 25 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def check
if session.platform != 'windows'
# Non-Windows systems are definitely not affected.
return CheckCode::Safe('Target is not a Windows system, so it is not affected by this vulnerability!')
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method initialize
has 56 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize(info = {})
super(
update_info(
info,
{
Method check
has 50 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def check
if session.platform != 'windows'
# Non-Windows systems are definitely not affected.
return CheckCode::Safe('Target is not a Windows system, so it is not affected by this vulnerability!')
end
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return CheckCode::Appears('Vulnerable Windows 10 20H1 build detected!')
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return CheckCode::Appears('Vulnerable Windows 10 v1909 build detected!')
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return CheckCode::Appears('Vulnerable Windows 10 v1903 build detected!')
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return CheckCode::Detected('Windows 8/Windows Server 2012 build detected!')
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return CheckCode::Appears('Vulnerable Windows 10 v1809 build detected!')
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return CheckCode::Appears('Vulnerable Windows 10 v1803 build detected!')
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return CheckCode::Appears('Vulnerable Windows 10 v1703 build detected!')
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return CheckCode::Appears('Vulnerable Windows 10 v1709 build detected!')
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return CheckCode::Appears('Vulnerable Windows 10 v1507 build detected!')
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return CheckCode::Appears('Vulnerable Windows 10 v1607 build detected!')
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return CheckCode::Appears('Vulnerable Windows 10 v1511 build detected!')
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return CheckCode::Appears('Vulnerable Windows 10 21H1 build detected!')
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return CheckCode::Appears('Vulnerable Windows 10 20H2 build detected!')
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return CheckCode::Appears('Vulnerable Windows 10 21H2 build detected!')
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return CheckCode::Detected('Windows 8.1/Windows Server 2012 R2 build detected!')
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return CheckCode::Detected('Windows 7/Windows Server 2008 R2 build detected!')
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return CheckCode::Safe('The build number of the target machine does not appear to be a vulnerable version!')
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return CheckCode::Detected('Windows Server 2008/Windows Server 2008 SP2 build detected!')
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def exploit
if is_system?
fail_with(Failure::None, 'Session is already elevated')
end
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 76.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
unless version.build_number.between?(Msf::WindowsVersion::Server2008_SP0, Msf::WindowsVersion::Win10_21H1) ||
version.build_number == Msf::WindowsVersion::Server2022 ||
version.build_number == Msf::WindowsVersion::Win11_21H2
return CheckCode::Safe('Target is not running a vulnerable version of Windows!')
end
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 28.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76