rapid7/metasploit-framework

View on GitHub
modules/post/multi/gather/jboss_gather.rb

Summary

Maintainability
D
2 days
Test Coverage

Method getports has a Cognitive Complexity of 26 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def getports(version)
    type1 = cmd_exec('locate bindings-jboss-beans.xml').split("\n")
    type2 = cmd_exec('locate jboss-web.deployer/server.xml').split("\n")
    port = []
    type1.each do |file1|
Severity: Minor
Found in modules/post/multi/gather/jboss_gather.rb - About 3 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method wingetport has a Cognitive Complexity of 23 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def wingetport(instances)
    port = []
    instances.each do |seed|
      path1 = "#{seed}\\conf\\bindingservice.beans\\META-INF\\bindings-jboss-beans.xml"
      path2 = "#{seed}\\deploy\\jboss-web.deployer\\server.xml"
Severity: Minor
Found in modules/post/multi/gather/jboss_gather.rb - About 3 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

File jboss_gather.rb has 293 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

require 'nokogiri'

class MetasploitModule < Msf::Post
  include Msf::Post::File
  include Msf::Post::Linux::System
Severity: Minor
Found in modules/post/multi/gather/jboss_gather.rb - About 3 hrs to fix

    Method getports has 45 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

      def getports(version)
        type1 = cmd_exec('locate bindings-jboss-beans.xml').split("\n")
        type2 = cmd_exec('locate jboss-web.deployer/server.xml').split("\n")
        port = []
        type1.each do |file1|
    Severity: Minor
    Found in modules/post/multi/gather/jboss_gather.rb - About 1 hr to fix

      Method getversion has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

        def getversion(array)
          i = 0
          version = 'NONE'
          results = []
          while i < array.count
      Severity: Minor
      Found in modules/post/multi/gather/jboss_gather.rb - About 1 hr to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Method wingetport has 39 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

        def wingetport(instances)
          port = []
          instances.each do |seed|
            path1 = "#{seed}\\conf\\bindingservice.beans\\META-INF\\bindings-jboss-beans.xml"
            path2 = "#{seed}\\deploy\\jboss-web.deployer\\server.xml"
      Severity: Minor
      Found in modules/post/multi/gather/jboss_gather.rb - About 1 hr to fix

        Method getversion has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

          def getversion(array)
            i = 0
            version = 'NONE'
            results = []
            while i < array.count
        Severity: Minor
        Found in modules/post/multi/gather/jboss_gather.rb - About 1 hr to fix

          Method wingetversion has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

            def wingetversion(array, home)
              i = 0
              version = 'NONE'
              results = []
              while i < array.count
          Severity: Minor
          Found in modules/post/multi/gather/jboss_gather.rb - About 55 mins to fix

          Cognitive Complexity

          Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

          A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

          • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
          • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
          • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

          Further reading

          Method getpw has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

            def getpw(file, ports)
              i = 0
              file.each do |pwfile|
                begin
                  print_status("Getting passwords from: #{pwfile}")
          Severity: Minor
          Found in modules/post/multi/gather/jboss_gather.rb - About 55 mins to fix

          Cognitive Complexity

          Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

          A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

          • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
          • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
          • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

          Further reading

          Method winhome has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

            def winhome
              home = []
              exec = cmd_exec('WMIC PROCESS get Caption,Commandline').split("\n")
              exec.each do |line|
                next unless line.downcase.include?('java.exe') && line.downcase.include?('jboss')
          Severity: Minor
          Found in modules/post/multi/gather/jboss_gather.rb - About 45 mins to fix

          Cognitive Complexity

          Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

          A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

          • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
          • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
          • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

          Further reading

          Method wingetinstances has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

            def wingetinstances(home, version)
              instances = []
              instance_location = "#{home}\\server"
              exec = cmd_exec("cmd /c dir #{instance_location}").split("\n")
              exec.each do |instance|
          Severity: Minor
          Found in modules/post/multi/gather/jboss_gather.rb - About 35 mins to fix

          Cognitive Complexity

          Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

          A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

          • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
          • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
          • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

          Further reading

          Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                  file1.each do |line|
                    if line.strip.include? 'deploy/httpha-invoker.sar'
                      parse = true
                    elsif ((line.strip == '</bean>') && portfound)
                      parse = false
          Severity: Minor
          Found in modules/post/multi/gather/jboss_gather.rb and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
          modules/post/multi/gather/jboss_gather.rb on lines 177..187

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 47.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                file1_read.each do |line|
                  if line.strip.include? 'deploy/httpha-invoker.sar'
                    parse = true
                  elsif ((line.strip == '</bean>') && portfound)
                    parse = false
          Severity: Minor
          Found in modules/post/multi/gather/jboss_gather.rb and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
          modules/post/multi/gather/jboss_gather.rb on lines 279..289

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 47.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                xml2.xpath('//Server//Connector').each do |connector|
                  next unless connector['protocol'].include? 'HTTP'
          
                  portnr = connector['port'].to_i
                  port.push(portnr)
          Severity: Minor
          Found in modules/post/multi/gather/jboss_gather.rb and 1 other location - About 20 mins to fix
          modules/post/multi/gather/jboss_gather.rb on lines 297..304

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 27.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                xml2.xpath('//Server//Connector').each do |connector|
                  next unless connector['protocol'].include? 'HTTP'
          
                  portnr = connector['port'].to_i
                  port.push(portnr)
          Severity: Minor
          Found in modules/post/multi/gather/jboss_gather.rb and 1 other location - About 20 mins to fix
          modules/post/multi/gather/jboss_gather.rb on lines 201..208

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 27.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

              login_data = {
                core: credential_core,
                status: Metasploit::Model::Login::Status::UNTRIED,
                address: ::Rex::Socket.getaddress(session.sock.peerhost, true),
                port: port,
          Severity: Minor
          Found in modules/post/multi/gather/jboss_gather.rb and 1 other location - About 15 mins to fix
          modules/post/multi/gather/tomcat_gather.rb on lines 54..62

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 26.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          There are no issues that match your filters.

          Category
          Status