Method domain_mode
has a Cognitive Complexity of 33 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def domain_mode
## check domain
server_name = get_domain('DomainControllerName')
if server_name
print_good("Found Domain : #{server_name}")
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method steal_token
has a Cognitive Complexity of 28 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def steal_token(domain_user, domain)
if (session.sys.config.getuid == domain_user) || (domain_user == '')
return true
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File add_user.rb
has 317 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class MetasploitModule < Msf::Post
include Msf::Post::Windows::Priv
include Msf::Post::Windows::Accounts
include Msf::Exploit::Deprecated
Method token_hunter
has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def token_hunter(domain)
## gather data
domain_admins = get_members_from_group('Domain Admins', get_domain('DomainControllerName'))
## load incognito
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method local_mode
has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def local_mode
if datastore['PASSWORD'].nil?
datastore['PASSWORD'] = Rex::Text.rand_text_alphanumeric(16) + Rex::Text.rand_text_numeric(2)
print_status("You have not set up a PASSWORD. The default is '#{datastore['PASSWORD']}'")
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method domain_mode
has 63 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def domain_mode
## check domain
server_name = get_domain('DomainControllerName')
if server_name
print_good("Found Domain : #{server_name}")
Method steal_token
has 57 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def steal_token(domain_user, domain)
if (session.sys.config.getuid == domain_user) || (domain_user == '')
return true
end
Method initialize
has 44 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize(info = {})
super(
update_info(
info,
'Name' => 'Windows Manage Add User to the Domain and/or to a Domain Group',
Method token_hunter
has 44 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def token_hunter(domain)
## gather data
domain_admins = get_members_from_group('Domain Admins', get_domain('DomainControllerName'))
## load incognito
Method check_result
has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def check_result(user_result)
case user_result['return']
when client.railgun.const('ERROR_ACCESS_DENIED')
print_error 'Sorry, you do not have permission to add that user.'
when client.railgun.const('NERR_UserExists')
Method local_mode
has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def local_mode
if datastore['PASSWORD'].nil?
datastore['PASSWORD'] = Rex::Text.rand_text_alphanumeric(16) + Rex::Text.rand_text_numeric(2)
print_status("You have not set up a PASSWORD. The default is '#{datastore['PASSWORD']}'")
end
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return false
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return true
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if datastore['PASSWORD'].nil?
datastore['PASSWORD'] = Rex::Text.rand_text_alphanumeric(16) + Rex::Text.rand_text_numeric(2)
print_status("You have not set up a PASSWORD. The default is '#{datastore['PASSWORD']}'")
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 25.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if datastore['PASSWORD'].nil?
datastore['PASSWORD'] = Rex::Text.rand_text_alphanumeric(16) + Rex::Text.rand_text_numeric(2)
print_status("You have not set up a PASSWORD. The default is '#{datastore['PASSWORD']}'")
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 25.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76