Showing 110 of 110 total issues
Method execute_search
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def execute_search
search = Search.for(Child)
@criteria.each do |criterion|
search.fulltext_by [criterion[:field]], criterion[:value]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method return_partial_hash
has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def return_partial_hash(change, field, history, model = nil)
if field == 'photo_keys'
return {:partial => 'shared/histories/photo_history_change',
:locals => {
:new_photos => change['added'],
Method to_csv
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def to_csv
fields = metadata_fields([], CHILD_IDENTIFIERS) + FormSection.all_visible_child_fields_for_form(model_class::FORM_NAME)
field_names = fields.map { |field| field.display_name }
csv_data = CSV.generate do |rows|
rows << field_names + CHILD_STATUS + metadata_fields([], CHILD_METADATA).map { |field| field.display_name }
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function start
has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
IdleSessionTimeout.start = function() {
var dialog_buttons = {};
dialog_buttons[I18n.t("messages.keep_working")] = function () {$(this).dialog('close');};
dialog_buttons[I18n.t("cancel")] = function () {$.idleTimeout.options.onTimeout.call(this);};
$("#dialog").dialog({
Method index
has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def index
authorize! :index, Child
@page_name = t('home.view_records')
@aside = 'shared/sidebar_links'
Method initialize_child_permissions
has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize_child_permissions(user)
if user.has_permission?(Permission::CHILDREN[:register])
can [:create], Child
can [:read], Child do |child|
child.created_by == user.user_name
Method build_details_of_interview_section
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.build_details_of_interview_section
details_of_interview_fields = [
Field.new('name' => '6_name',
'type' => 'text_field',
'display_name_all' => 'Name'
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def respond_to_export(format, children)
RapidftrAddon::ExportTask.active.each do |export_task|
format.any(export_task.id) do
authorize! "export_#{export_task.id}".to_sym, Child
LogEntry.create! :type => LogEntry::TYPE[export_task.id], :user_name => current_user.user_name, :organisation => current_user.organisation, :child_ids => children.map(&:id)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 51.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def respond_to_export(format, children)
RapidftrAddon::ExportTask.active.each do |export_task|
format.any(export_task.id) do
authorize! "export_#{export_task.id}".to_sym, Child
LogEntry.create! :type => LogEntry::TYPE[export_task.id], :user_name => current_user.user_name, :organisation => current_user.organisation, :child_ids => children.map(&:id)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 51.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def respond_to_export(format, enquiries)
RapidftrAddon::ExportTask.active.each do |export_task|
format.any(export_task.id) do
authorize! "export_#{export_task.id}".to_sym, Enquiry
LogEntry.create! :type => LogEntry::TYPE[export_task.id], :user_name => current_user.user_name, :organisation => current_user.organisation, :enquiry_ids => enquiries.map(&:id)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 51.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method authenticate_user
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def authenticate_user
user = User.find_by_user_name(@user_name)
if user && user.authenticate(@password)
mobile_login_history = user.mobile_login_history.first
imei = mobile_login_history.nil? ? '' : mobile_login_history['imei']
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method return_partial_hash
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def return_partial_hash(change, field, history, model = nil)
if field == 'photo_keys'
return {:partial => 'shared/histories/photo_history_change',
:locals => {
:new_photos => change['added'],
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method mark_or_unmark_as_reunited
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def mark_or_unmark_as_reunited(reunited)
without_updating_matches do
Enquiry.skip_callback(:save, :after, :find_matching_children)
self['reunited'] = reunited
save!
Method update
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def update
respond_to do |format|
format.json do
params[:child] = JSON.parse(params[:child]) if params[:child].is_a?(String)
child = update_child_from params
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def self.build_photo_audio_section
photo_audio_fields = [
Field.new('name' => '7_current_photo_key',
'type' => 'photo_upload_box', 'editable' => false,
'display_name_all' => 'Current Photo Key'
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 46.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def self.build_photo_audio_section
photo_audio_fields = [
Field.new('name' => 'current_photo_key',
'type' => 'photo_upload_box', 'editable' => false,
'display_name_all' => 'Current Photo Key'
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 46.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method sync_unverified
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def sync_unverified
params[:child] = JSON.parse(params[:child]) if params[:child].is_a?(String)
params[:child][:photo] = params[:current_photo_key] unless params[:current_photo_key].nil?
if params[:child][:_id]
child = Child.get(params[:child][:_id])
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method index
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def index
authorize! :index, Enquiry
@page_name = t('home.view_records')
@filter = params[:filter] || nil
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method update_from
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def update_from(properties)
attributes_to_update = {}
properties.each_pair do |name, value|
if value.instance_of?(HashWithIndifferentAccess) || value.instance_of?(ActionController::Parameters)
attributes_to_update[name] = self[name] if attributes_to_update[name].nil?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method initialize_child_permissions
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize_child_permissions(user)
if user.has_permission?(Permission::CHILDREN[:register])
can [:create], Child
can [:read], Child do |child|
child.created_by == user.user_name
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"