Sign upLogin

razielsd/phpSelenide

View on GitHub
Star
lib/Selenide/Condition/Checked.php

Summary

Maintainability
B
6 hrs
Test Coverage

Avoid using static access to class '\PHPUnit\Framework\Assert' in method 'assertCollectionNegative'.
Open

            Assert::assertFalse(
                $element->checked(),
                $prefix . 'Element is checked'
            );
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/Selenide/Condition/Checked.php by phpmd

StaticAccess

Since: 1.4.0

Static access causes unexchangeable dependencies to other classes and leads to hard to test code. Avoid using static access at all costs and instead inject dependencies through the constructor. The only case when static access is acceptable is when used for factory methods.

Example

class Foo
{
    public function bar()
    {
        Bar::baz();
    }
}

Source https://phpmd.org/rules/cleancode.html#staticaccess

Avoid using static access to class '\PHPUnit\Framework\Assert' in method 'assertCollectionPositive'.
Open

            Assert::assertTrue(
                $element->checked(),
                $prefix . 'Element is not checked'
            );
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/Selenide/Condition/Checked.php by phpmd

StaticAccess

Since: 1.4.0

Static access causes unexchangeable dependencies to other classes and leads to hard to test code. Avoid using static access at all costs and instead inject dependencies through the constructor. The only case when static access is acceptable is when used for factory methods.

Example

class Foo
{
    public function bar()
    {
        Bar::baz();
    }
}

Source https://phpmd.org/rules/cleancode.html#staticaccess

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

<?php

namespace Selenide;

use PHPUnit\Framework\Assert;
Severity: Major
Found in lib/Selenide/Condition/Checked.php and 1 other location - About 6 hrs to fix
lib/Selenide/Condition/Enabled.php on lines 1..50

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 210.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

The class Condition_Checked is not named in CamelCase.
Open

class Condition_Checked extends Condition_Rule
    implements Condition_Interface_Match, Condition_Interface_assertCollection
{
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/Selenide/Condition/Checked.php by phpmd

CamelCaseClassName

Since: 0.2

It is considered best practice to use the CamelCase notation to name classes.

Example

class class_name {
}

Source

There are no issues that match your filters.

Category
Status