Showing 6 of 6 total issues
Method clear_triggers
has a Cognitive Complexity of 30 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def clear_triggers(*trigger_types, component_or_manager: nil)
trigger_types = %i[addition_triggers removal_triggers attr_triggers] if trigger_types.empty?
if trigger_types.include? :attr_triggers
if (trigger_types - %i[addition_triggers
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method clear_triggers
has 50 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def clear_triggers(*trigger_types, component_or_manager: nil)
trigger_types = %i[addition_triggers removal_triggers attr_triggers] if trigger_types.empty?
if trigger_types.include? :attr_triggers
if (trigger_types - %i[addition_triggers
Method group
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def group(*component_managers, &block)
return nil if component_managers.empty?
if component_managers.length == 1
component_managers.first.each do |cmp|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method new
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def new(component_name, *attrs, **attrs_with_defaults)
if FelECS::Components.const_defined?(component_name)
raise(NameError.new, "Component Manager '#{component_name}' is already defined")
end
Method group
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def group(*component_managers, &block)
return nil if component_managers.empty?
if component_managers.length == 1
component_managers.first.each do |cmp|
Method new
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def new(component_name, *attrs, **attrs_with_defaults)
if FelECS::Components.const_defined?(component_name)
raise(NameError.new, "Component Manager '#{component_name}' is already defined")
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"