red6/dmn-check

Checks for long lines.

Rationale: Long lines are hard to read in printouts or if developershave limited screen space for the source code, e.g. if the IDEdisplays additional information like project tree, class hierarchy,etc.

This documentation is written and maintained by the Checkstyle community and is covered under the same license as the Checkstyle project.

Checks for long lines.

Rationale: Long lines are hard to read in printouts or if developershave limited screen space for the source code, e.g. if the IDEdisplays additional information like project tree, class hierarchy,etc.

This documentation is written and maintained by the Checkstyle community and is covered under the same license as the Checkstyle project.

Checks for long lines.

Rationale: Long lines are hard to read in printouts or if developershave limited screen space for the source code, e.g. if the IDEdisplays additional information like project tree, class hierarchy,etc.

This documentation is written and maintained by the Checkstyle community and is covered under the same license as the Checkstyle project.

Checks for long lines.

Rationale: Long lines are hard to read in printouts or if developershave limited screen space for the source code, e.g. if the IDEdisplays additional information like project tree, class hierarchy,etc.

This documentation is written and maintained by the Checkstyle community and is covered under the same license as the Checkstyle project.

Checks for long lines.

Rationale: Long lines are hard to read in printouts or if developershave limited screen space for the source code, e.g. if the IDEdisplays additional information like project tree, class hierarchy,etc.

This documentation is written and maintained by the Checkstyle community and is covered under the same license as the Checkstyle project.

Duplicated string literals make the process of refactoring error-prone, since you must be sure to update all occurrences.

On the other hand, constants can be referenced from many places, but only need to be updated in a single place.

Noncompliant Code Example

With the default threshold of 3:

public void run() {
  prepare("action1");                              // Noncompliant - "action1" is duplicated 3 times
  execute("action1");
  release("action1");
}

@SuppressWarning("all")                            // Compliant - annotations are excluded
private void method1() { /* ... */ }
@SuppressWarning("all")
private void method2() { /* ... */ }

public String method3(String a) {
  System.out.println("'" + a + "'");               // Compliant - literal "'" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
  return "";                                       // Compliant - literal "" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
}

Compliant Solution

private static final String ACTION_1 = "action1";  // Compliant

public void run() {
  prepare(ACTION_1);                               // Compliant
  execute(ACTION_1);
  release(ACTION_1);
}

Exceptions

To prevent generating some false-positives, literals having less than 5 characters are excluded.

Generic types shouldn't be used raw (without type parameters) in variable declarations or return values. Doing so bypasses generic type checking, and defers the catch of unsafe code to runtime.

Noncompliant Code Example

List myList; // Noncompliant
Set mySet; // Noncompliant

Compliant Solution

List<String> myList;
Set<? extends Number> mySet;

Duplicated string literals make the process of refactoring error-prone, since you must be sure to update all occurrences.

On the other hand, constants can be referenced from many places, but only need to be updated in a single place.

Noncompliant Code Example

With the default threshold of 3:

public void run() {
  prepare("action1");                              // Noncompliant - "action1" is duplicated 3 times
  execute("action1");
  release("action1");
}

@SuppressWarning("all")                            // Compliant - annotations are excluded
private void method1() { /* ... */ }
@SuppressWarning("all")
private void method2() { /* ... */ }

public String method3(String a) {
  System.out.println("'" + a + "'");               // Compliant - literal "'" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
  return "";                                       // Compliant - literal "" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
}

Compliant Solution

private static final String ACTION_1 = "action1";  // Compliant

public void run() {
  prepare(ACTION_1);                               // Compliant
  execute(ACTION_1);
  release(ACTION_1);
}

Exceptions

To prevent generating some false-positives, literals having less than 5 characters are excluded.

Overriding or shadowing a variable declared in an outer scope can strongly impact the readability, and therefore the maintainability, of a piece of code. Further, it could lead maintainers to introduce bugs because they think they're using one variable but are really using another.

Noncompliant Code Example

class Foo {
  public int myField;

  public void doSomething() {
    int myField = 0;
    ...
  }
}

See

• CERT, DCL01-C. - Do not reuse variable names in subscopes
• CERT, DCL51-J. - Do not shadow or obscure identifiers in subscopes

Unused parameters are misleading. Whatever the values passed to such parameters, the behavior will be the same.

Noncompliant Code Example

void doSomething(int a, int b) {     // "b" is unused
  compute(a);
}

Compliant Solution

void doSomething(int a) {
  compute(a);
}

Exceptions

The rule will not raise issues for unused parameters:

• that are annotated with @javax.enterprise.event.Observes
• in overrides and implementation methods
• in interface default methods
• in non-private methods that only throw or that have empty bodies
• in annotated methods, unless the annotation is @SuppressWarning("unchecked") or @SuppressWarning("rawtypes"), in which case the annotation will be ignored
• in overridable methods (non-final, or not member of a final class, non-static, non-private), if the parameter is documented with a proper javadoc.

@Override
void doSomething(int a, int b) {     // no issue reported on b
  compute(a);
}

public void foo(String s) {
  // designed to be extended but noop in standard case
}

protected void bar(String s) {
  //open-closed principle
}

public void qix(String s) {
  throw new UnsupportedOperationException("This method should be implemented in subclasses");
}

/**
 * @param s This string may be use for further computation in overriding classes
 */
protected void foobar(int a, String s) { // no issue, method is overridable and unused parameter has proper javadoc
  compute(a);
}

See

• CERT, MSC12-C. - Detect and remove code that has no effect or is never executed

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how hard the control flow of a method is to understand. Methods with high Cognitive Complexity will be difficult to maintain.

See

• Cognitive Complexity

Generic types shouldn't be used raw (without type parameters) in variable declarations or return values. Doing so bypasses generic type checking, and defers the catch of unsafe code to runtime.

Noncompliant Code Example

List myList; // Noncompliant
Set mySet; // Noncompliant

Compliant Solution

List<String> myList;
Set<? extends Number> mySet;

Generic types shouldn't be used raw (without type parameters) in variable declarations or return values. Doing so bypasses generic type checking, and defers the catch of unsafe code to runtime.

Noncompliant Code Example

List myList; // Noncompliant
Set mySet; // Noncompliant

Compliant Solution

List<String> myList;
Set<? extends Number> mySet;

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how hard the control flow of a method is to understand. Methods with high Cognitive Complexity will be difficult to maintain.

See

• Cognitive Complexity

Duplicated string literals make the process of refactoring error-prone, since you must be sure to update all occurrences.

On the other hand, constants can be referenced from many places, but only need to be updated in a single place.

Noncompliant Code Example

With the default threshold of 3:

public void run() {
  prepare("action1");                              // Noncompliant - "action1" is duplicated 3 times
  execute("action1");
  release("action1");
}

@SuppressWarning("all")                            // Compliant - annotations are excluded
private void method1() { /* ... */ }
@SuppressWarning("all")
private void method2() { /* ... */ }

public String method3(String a) {
  System.out.println("'" + a + "'");               // Compliant - literal "'" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
  return "";                                       // Compliant - literal "" has less than 5 characters and is excluded
}

Compliant Solution

private static final String ACTION_1 = "action1";  // Compliant

public void run() {
  prepare(ACTION_1);                               // Compliant
  execute(ACTION_1);
  release(ACTION_1);
}

Exceptions

To prevent generating some false-positives, literals having less than 5 characters are excluded.

Returning null instead of an actual array or collection forces callers of the method to explicitly test for nullity, making them more complex and less readable.

Moreover, in many cases, null is used as a synonym for empty.

Noncompliant Code Example

public static List<Result> getResults() {
  return null;                             // Noncompliant
}

public static Result[] getResults() {
  return null;                             // Noncompliant
}

public static void main(String[] args) {
  Result[] results = getResults();

  if (results != null) {                   // Nullity test required to prevent NPE
    for (Result result: results) {
      /* ... */
    }
  }
}

Compliant Solution

public static List<Result> getResults() {
  return Collections.emptyList();          // Compliant
}

public static Result[] getResults() {
  return new Result[0];
}

public static void main(String[] args) {
  for (Result result: getResults()) {
    /* ... */
  }
}

See

• CERT, MSC19-C. - For functions that return an array, prefer returning an empty array over a null value
• CERT, MET55-J. - Return an empty array or collection instead of a null value for methods that return an array or collection

Returning null instead of an actual array or collection forces callers of the method to explicitly test for nullity, making them more complex and less readable.

Moreover, in many cases, null is used as a synonym for empty.

Noncompliant Code Example

public static List<Result> getResults() {
  return null;                             // Noncompliant
}

public static Result[] getResults() {
  return null;                             // Noncompliant
}

public static void main(String[] args) {
  Result[] results = getResults();

  if (results != null) {                   // Nullity test required to prevent NPE
    for (Result result: results) {
      /* ... */
    }
  }
}

Compliant Solution

public static List<Result> getResults() {
  return Collections.emptyList();          // Compliant
}

public static Result[] getResults() {
  return new Result[0];
}

public static void main(String[] args) {
  for (Result result: getResults()) {
    /* ... */
  }
}

See

• CERT, MSC19-C. - For functions that return an array, prefer returning an empty array over a null value
• CERT, MET55-J. - Return an empty array or collection instead of a null value for methods that return an array or collection

FIXME tags are commonly used to mark places where a bug is suspected, but which the developer wants to deal with later.

Sometimes the developer will not have the time or will simply forget to get back to that tag.

This rule is meant to track those tags and to ensure that they do not go unnoticed.

Noncompliant Code Example

int divide(int numerator, int denominator) {
  return numerator / denominator;              // FIXME denominator value might be  0
}

See

• MITRE, CWE-546 - Suspicious Comment