File queries_helper.rb
has 451 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
require 'redmine/export/csv'
module QueriesHelper
include ApplicationHelper
Method filters_options_for_select
has a Cognitive Complexity of 26 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def filters_options_for_select(query)
ungrouped = []
grouped = {label_string: [], label_date: [], label_time_tracking: [], label_attachment: []}
query.available_filters.map do |field, field_options|
if /^cf_\d+\./.match?(field)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method retrieve_query
has a Cognitive Complexity of 23 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def retrieve_query(klass=IssueQuery, use_session=true, options={})
session_key = klass.name.underscore.to_sym
if params[:query_id].present?
scope = klass.where(:project_id => nil)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method grouped_query_results
has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def grouped_query_results(items, query, &block)
result_count_by_group = query.result_count_by_group
previous_group, first = false, true
totals_by_group = query.totalable_columns.inject({}) do |h, column|
h[column] = query.total_by_group_for(column)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method csv_value
has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def csv_value(column, object, value)
case column.name
when :attachments
value.to_a.map {|a| a.filename}.join("\n")
else
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method retrieve_query
has 45 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def retrieve_query(klass=IssueQuery, use_session=true, options={})
session_key = klass.name.underscore.to_sym
if params[:query_id].present?
scope = klass.where(:project_id => nil)
Method column_value
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def column_value(column, item, value)
content =
case column.name
when :id
link_to value, issue_path(item)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method column_header
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def column_header(query, column, options={})
if column.sortable?
css, order = nil, column.default_order
if column.name.to_s == query.sort_criteria.first_key
if query.sort_criteria.first_asc?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method filters_options_for_select
has 38 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def filters_options_for_select(query)
ungrouped = []
grouped = {label_string: [], label_date: [], label_time_tracking: [], label_attachment: []}
query.available_filters.map do |field, field_options|
if /^cf_\d+\./.match?(field)
Method retrieve_query_from_session
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def retrieve_query_from_session(klass=IssueQuery)
session_key = klass.name.underscore.to_sym
session_data = session[session_key]
if session_data
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method query_links
has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def query_links(title, queries)
return '' if queries.empty?
# links to #index on issues/show
url_params =
Method column_value
has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def column_value(column, item, value)
content =
case column.name
when :id
link_to value, issue_path(item)
Method column_header
has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def column_header(query, column, options={})
if column.sortable?
css, order = nil, column.default_order
if column.name.to_s == query.sort_criteria.first_key
if query.sort_criteria.first_asc?
Method query_links
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def query_links(title, queries)
return '' if queries.empty?
# links to #index on issues/show
url_params =
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method query_as_hidden_field_tags
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def query_as_hidden_field_tags(query)
tags = hidden_field_tag("set_filter", "1", :id => nil)
if query.filters.present?
query.filters.each do |field, filter|
Method retrieve_query_from_session
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def retrieve_query_from_session(klass=IssueQuery)
session_key = klass.name.underscore.to_sym
session_data = session[session_key]
if session_data
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
query.filters.each do |field, options|
tags << hidden_field_tag("f[]", field, :id => nil)
tags << hidden_field_tag("op[#{field}]", options[:operator], :id => nil)
options[:values].each do |value|
tags << hidden_field_tag("v[#{field}][]", value, :id => nil)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 44.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
query.filters.each do |field, filter|
tags << hidden_field_tag("f[]", field, :id => nil)
tags << hidden_field_tag("op[#{field}]", filter[:operator], :id => nil)
filter[:values].each do |value|
tags << hidden_field_tag("v[#{field}][]", value, :id => nil)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 44.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76