redmine/redmine

View on GitHub
app/models/version.rb

Summary

Maintainability
C
1 day
Test Coverage

Class Version has 39 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

class Version < ApplicationRecord
  include Redmine::SafeAttributes

  after_update :update_issues_from_sharing_change
  after_save :update_default_project_version
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/version.rb - About 5 hrs to fix

    File version.rb has 312 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    module FixedIssuesExtension
      # Returns the total estimated time for this version
      # (sum of leaves estimated_hours)
      def estimated_hours
        @estimated_hours ||= sum(:estimated_hours).to_f
    Severity: Minor
    Found in app/models/version.rb - About 3 hrs to fix

      Method <=> has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

        def <=>(version)
          return nil unless version.is_a?(Version)
      
          if self.effective_date
            if version.effective_date
      Severity: Minor
      Found in app/models/version.rb - About 2 hrs to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Method allowed_sharings has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

        def allowed_sharings(user = User.current)
          VERSION_SHARINGS.select do |s|
            if sharing == s
              true
            else
      Severity: Minor
      Found in app/models/version.rb - About 35 mins to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Method load_counts has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

        def load_counts
          unless @open_count
            @open_count = 0
            @closed_count = 0
            self.group(:status).count.each do |status, count|
      Severity: Minor
      Found in app/models/version.rb - About 25 mins to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

          if attrs['custom_fields'].present?
            editable_custom_field_ids = editable_custom_field_values(user).map {|v| v.custom_field_id.to_s}
            attrs['custom_fields'].reject! {|c| !editable_custom_field_ids.include?(c['id'].to_s)}
      Severity: Minor
      Found in app/models/version.rb and 1 other location - About 20 mins to fix
      app/models/project.rb on lines 898..900

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 28.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

          if attrs['custom_field_values'].present?
            editable_custom_field_ids = editable_custom_field_values(user).map {|v| v.custom_field_id.to_s}
            attrs['custom_field_values'].reject! {|k, v| !editable_custom_field_ids.include?(k.to_s)}
      Severity: Minor
      Found in app/models/version.rb and 1 other location - About 15 mins to fix
      app/models/project.rb on lines 892..894

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 26.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      There are no issues that match your filters.

      Category
      Status