Showing 1,401 of 1,401 total issues
Method call
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def call(log, _logger) # rubocop:disable AbcSize, PerceivedComplexity, CyclomaticComplexity
# Date & time
message = time_format.nil? ? "" : "#{format_time(log.time)} "
# Log level and process info
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method each_exception
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def each_exception # rubocop:disable AbcSize, PerceivedComplexity, CyclomaticComplexity
# With thanks to https://github.com/bugsnag/bugsnag-ruby/blob/6348306e44323eee347896843d16c690cd7c4362/lib/bugsnag/notification.rb#L81
depth = 0
exceptions = []
ex = exception
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method record
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def record(event) # rubocop:disable AbcSize, CyclomaticComplexity, PerceivedComplexity
return unless record?
payload = event.payload
name = payload[:name]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method log_with_level
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def log_with_level(level, message = nil, payload = nil, exception = nil, &block)
Method log_with_exception
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def log_with_exception(level, message = nil, payload = nil, exception = nil, &block)
Method log_internal
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def log_internal(level, index, message = nil, payload = nil, exception = nil)
Method constantize
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.constantize(class_name)
return class_name unless class_name.is_a?(String)
if RUBY_VERSION.to_i >= 2
Object.const_get(class_name)
else
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
module Extensions
module Grape
module Timings
extend self
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 31.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
module Extensions
module Sinatra
module Timings
extend self
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 31.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method record
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def record(event) # rubocop:disable AbcSize
return unless record?
payload = event.payload
method = payload[:method].downcase
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method duration_to_s
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def duration_to_s
return unless duration
format((duration < 10.0 ? "%.3fms" : "%.1fms"), duration)
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method yaml_safe_load
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def yaml_safe_load(yaml_code, filename)
if YAML.respond_to?(:safe_load) # Ruby 2.1+
if defined?(SafeYAML) && SafeYAML.respond_to?(:load)
SafeYAML.load(yaml_code, filename,
whitelisted_tags: %w(!ruby/regexp),
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method included
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.included(base) # rubocop:disable AbcSize
base.extend(ClassMethods)
base.class_eval do
const_set(:SAPIENCE_MODEL_CREATE_METRICS_KEY, "model.#{tableized_name}.create")
const_set(:SAPIENCE_MODEL_UPDATE_METRICS_KEY, "model.#{tableized_name}.update")
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method namify
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.namify(appname, sep = "_")
return unless appname.is_a?(String)
return if appname.empty?
# Turn unwanted chars into the separator
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method backtrace_to_s
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def backtrace_to_s
trace = ""
each_exception do |exception, i|
if i == 0
trace += (exception.backtrace || []).join("\n")
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Block has too many lines. [26/25] Open
task :merge do
hide_coverage_config
require "json"
require "simplecov/version"
require "simplecov/result"
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks if the length of a block exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable. The cop can be configured to ignore blocks passed to certain methods.
Line is too long. [86/80] Open
# from scratch. The latter is a flawed and unsustainable approach (the more migrations
- Exclude checks
Prefer single-quoted strings when you don't need string interpolation or special symbols. Open
gem "test-unit"
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Checks if uses of quotes match the configured preference.
Example: EnforcedStyle: single_quotes (default)
# bad
"No special symbols"
"No string interpolation"
"Just text"
# good
'No special symbols'
'No string interpolation'
'Just text'
"Wait! What's #{this}!"
Example: EnforcedStyle: double_quotes
# bad
'Just some text'
'No special chars or interpolation'
# good
"Just some text"
"No special chars or interpolation"
"Every string in #{project} uses double_quotes"
Prefer single-quoted strings when you don't need string interpolation or special symbols. Open
Rails.application.config.session_store :cookie_store, key: "_rails_4_2_session"
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Checks if uses of quotes match the configured preference.
Example: EnforcedStyle: single_quotes (default)
# bad
"No special symbols"
"No string interpolation"
"Just text"
# good
'No special symbols'
'No string interpolation'
'Just text'
"Wait! What's #{this}!"
Example: EnforcedStyle: double_quotes
# bad
'Just some text'
'No special chars or interpolation'
# good
"Just some text"
"No special chars or interpolation"
"Every string in #{project} uses double_quotes"
Line is too long. [85/80] Open
# Settings specified here will take precedence over those in config/application.rb.
- Exclude checks