Module has too many lines. [149/100] Open
module Sapience
# Log Struct
#
# Structure for holding all log entries. We're using a struct because we want it to be fast and lightweight.
#
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks if the length a module exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable.
Block has too many lines. [146/25] Open
Log = Struct.new(:level, :thread_name, :name, :message, :payload, :time, :duration, :tags, :level_index, :exception, :metric, :backtrace, :metric_amount) do
MAX_EXCEPTIONS_TO_UNWRAP = 5
MILLISECONDS_IN_SECOND = 1_000
MILLISECONDS_IN_MINUTE = 60_000
MILLISECONDS_IN_HOUR = 3_600_000
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks if the length of a block exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable. The cop can be configured to ignore blocks passed to certain methods.
Method has too many lines. [43/10] Open
def to_h(host = Sapience.config.host, app_name = Sapience.app_name, environment = Sapience.environment) # rubocop:disable AbcSize, CyclomaticComplexity, PerceivedComplexity, LineLength
# Header
h = {
name: name,
pid: $PROCESS_ID,
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks if the length of a method exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable.
Method to_h
has a Cognitive Complexity of 28 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def to_h(host = Sapience.config.host, app_name = Sapience.app_name, environment = Sapience.environment) # rubocop:disable AbcSize, CyclomaticComplexity, PerceivedComplexity, LineLength
# Header
h = {
name: name,
pid: $PROCESS_ID,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method has too many lines. [20/10] Open
def duration_human # rubocop:disable AbcSize, CyclomaticComplexity, PerceivedComplexity
return nil unless duration
days, ms = duration.divmod(MILLISECONDS_IN_DAY)
hours, ms = ms.divmod(MILLISECONDS_IN_HOUR)
minutes, ms = ms.divmod(MILLISECONDS_IN_MINUTE)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks if the length of a method exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable.
Method duration_human
has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def duration_human # rubocop:disable AbcSize, CyclomaticComplexity, PerceivedComplexity
return nil unless duration
days, ms = duration.divmod(MILLISECONDS_IN_DAY)
hours, ms = ms.divmod(MILLISECONDS_IN_HOUR)
minutes, ms = ms.divmod(MILLISECONDS_IN_MINUTE)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method has too many lines. [16/10] Open
def each_exception # rubocop:disable AbcSize, PerceivedComplexity, CyclomaticComplexity
# With thanks to https://github.com/bugsnag/bugsnag-ruby/blob/6348306e44323eee347896843d16c690cd7c4362/lib/bugsnag/notification.rb#L81
depth = 0
exceptions = []
ex = exception
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks if the length of a method exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable.
Method to_h
has 43 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def to_h(host = Sapience.config.host, app_name = Sapience.app_name, environment = Sapience.environment) # rubocop:disable AbcSize, CyclomaticComplexity, PerceivedComplexity, LineLength
# Header
h = {
name: name,
pid: $PROCESS_ID,
Method payload
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def payload # rubocop:disable AbcSize
return self[:payload] unless self[:payload].is_a?(Hash) && self[:payload][:params].is_a?(Hash)
@payload ||= nil
return @payload unless @payload.nil?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method file_name_and_line
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def file_name_and_line(short_name = false) # rubocop:disable CyclomaticComplexity
return unless backtrace || (exception && exception.backtrace) # rubocop: disable Style/SafeNavigation
stack = backtrace || exception.backtrace
extract_file_and_line(stack, short_name) if stack && !stack.empty?
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method each_exception
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def each_exception # rubocop:disable AbcSize, PerceivedComplexity, CyclomaticComplexity
# With thanks to https://github.com/bugsnag/bugsnag-ruby/blob/6348306e44323eee347896843d16c690cd7c4362/lib/bugsnag/notification.rb#L81
depth = 0
exceptions = []
ex = exception
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method duration_to_s
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def duration_to_s
return unless duration
format((duration < 10.0 ? "%.3fms" : "%.1fms"), duration)
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method backtrace_to_s
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def backtrace_to_s
trace = ""
each_exception do |exception, i|
if i == 0
trace += (exception.backtrace || []).join("\n")
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Use hours.positive?
instead of hours > 0
. Open
str += " #{hours}h" if hours > 0
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for usage of comparison operators (==
,
>
, <
) to test numbers as zero, positive, or negative.
These can be replaced by their respective predicate methods.
The cop can also be configured to do the reverse.
The cop disregards #nonzero?
as it its value is truthy or falsey,
but not true
and false
, and thus not always interchangeable with
!= 0
.
The cop ignores comparisons to global variables, since they are often
populated with objects which can be compared with integers, but are
not themselves Interger
polymorphic.
Example: EnforcedStyle: predicate (default)
# bad
foo == 0
0 > foo
bar.baz > 0
# good
foo.zero?
foo.negative?
bar.baz.positive?
Example: EnforcedStyle: comparison
# bad
foo.zero?
foo.negative?
bar.baz.positive?
# good
foo == 0
0 > foo
bar.baz > 0
Avoid comma after the last item of a hash. Open
environment: environment,
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for trailing comma in array and hash literals.
Example: EnforcedStyleForMultiline: consistent_comma
# bad
a = [1, 2,]
# good
a = [
1, 2,
3,
]
# good
a = [
1,
2,
]
Example: EnforcedStyleForMultiline: comma
# bad
a = [1, 2,]
# good
a = [
1,
2,
]
Example: EnforcedStyleForMultiline: no_comma (default)
# bad
a = [1, 2,]
# good
a = [
1,
2
]
Prefer single-quoted strings when you don't need string interpolation or special symbols. Open
format((duration < 10.0 ? "%.3fms" : "%.1fms"), duration)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Checks if uses of quotes match the configured preference.
Example: EnforcedStyle: single_quotes (default)
# bad
"No special symbols"
"No string interpolation"
"Just text"
# good
'No special symbols'
'No string interpolation'
'Just text'
"Wait! What's #{this}!"
Example: EnforcedStyle: double_quotes
# bad
'Just some text'
'No special chars or interpolation'
# good
"Just some text"
"No special chars or interpolation"
"Every string in #{project} uses double_quotes"
Line is too long. [98/80] Open
# The backtrace_level captured at source when the log level >= Sapience.config.backtrace_level
- Exclude checks
Avoid comma after the last item of a hash. Open
stack_trace: exception.backtrace,
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for trailing comma in array and hash literals.
Example: EnforcedStyleForMultiline: consistent_comma
# bad
a = [1, 2,]
# good
a = [
1, 2,
3,
]
# good
a = [
1,
2,
]
Example: EnforcedStyleForMultiline: comma
# bad
a = [1, 2,]
# good
a = [
1,
2,
]
Example: EnforcedStyleForMultiline: no_comma (default)
# bad
a = [1, 2,]
# good
a = [
1,
2
]
Prefer single-quoted strings when you don't need string interpolation or special symbols. Open
@payload[:params][filter] = "[FILTERED]" if @payload[:params].key?(filter)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Checks if uses of quotes match the configured preference.
Example: EnforcedStyle: single_quotes (default)
# bad
"No special symbols"
"No string interpolation"
"Just text"
# good
'No special symbols'
'No string interpolation'
'Just text'
"Wait! What's #{this}!"
Example: EnforcedStyle: double_quotes
# bad
'Just some text'
'No special chars or interpolation'
# good
"Just some text"
"No special chars or interpolation"
"Every string in #{project} uses double_quotes"
Use seconds.positive?
instead of seconds > 0
. Open
str += " #{seconds}s" if seconds > 0
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for usage of comparison operators (==
,
>
, <
) to test numbers as zero, positive, or negative.
These can be replaced by their respective predicate methods.
The cop can also be configured to do the reverse.
The cop disregards #nonzero?
as it its value is truthy or falsey,
but not true
and false
, and thus not always interchangeable with
!= 0
.
The cop ignores comparisons to global variables, since they are often
populated with objects which can be compared with integers, but are
not themselves Interger
polymorphic.
Example: EnforcedStyle: predicate (default)
# bad
foo == 0
0 > foo
bar.baz > 0
# good
foo.zero?
foo.negative?
bar.baz.positive?
Example: EnforcedStyle: comparison
# bad
foo.zero?
foo.negative?
bar.baz.positive?
# good
foo == 0
0 > foo
bar.baz > 0
Use days.positive?
instead of days > 0
. Open
if days > 0 || hours > 0 || minutes > 0
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for usage of comparison operators (==
,
>
, <
) to test numbers as zero, positive, or negative.
These can be replaced by their respective predicate methods.
The cop can also be configured to do the reverse.
The cop disregards #nonzero?
as it its value is truthy or falsey,
but not true
and false
, and thus not always interchangeable with
!= 0
.
The cop ignores comparisons to global variables, since they are often
populated with objects which can be compared with integers, but are
not themselves Interger
polymorphic.
Example: EnforcedStyle: predicate (default)
# bad
foo == 0
0 > foo
bar.baz > 0
# good
foo.zero?
foo.negative?
bar.baz.positive?
Example: EnforcedStyle: comparison
# bad
foo.zero?
foo.negative?
bar.baz.positive?
# good
foo == 0
0 > foo
bar.baz > 0
Prefer single-quoted strings when you don't need string interpolation or special symbols. Open
format "%.3fs", duration / MILLISECONDS_IN_SECOND.to_f
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Checks if uses of quotes match the configured preference.
Example: EnforcedStyle: single_quotes (default)
# bad
"No special symbols"
"No string interpolation"
"Just text"
# good
'No special symbols'
'No string interpolation'
'Just text'
"Wait! What's #{this}!"
Example: EnforcedStyle: double_quotes
# bad
'Just some text'
'No special chars or interpolation'
# good
"Just some text"
"No special chars or interpolation"
"Every string in #{project} uses double_quotes"
Prefer single-quoted strings inside interpolations. Open
format("#{time.strftime("%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S")}.%06d", time.usec) # rubocop: disable Style/FormatStringToken
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that quotes inside the string interpolation match the configured preference.
Example: EnforcedStyle: single_quotes (default)
# bad
result = "Tests #{success ? "PASS" : "FAIL"}"
# good
result = "Tests #{success ? 'PASS' : 'FAIL'}"
Example: EnforcedStyle: double_quotes
# bad
result = "Tests #{success ? 'PASS' : 'FAIL'}"
# good
result = "Tests #{success ? "PASS" : "FAIL"}"
Use i.zero?
instead of i == 0
. Open
if i == 0
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for usage of comparison operators (==
,
>
, <
) to test numbers as zero, positive, or negative.
These can be replaced by their respective predicate methods.
The cop can also be configured to do the reverse.
The cop disregards #nonzero?
as it its value is truthy or falsey,
but not true
and false
, and thus not always interchangeable with
!= 0
.
The cop ignores comparisons to global variables, since they are often
populated with objects which can be compared with integers, but are
not themselves Interger
polymorphic.
Example: EnforcedStyle: predicate (default)
# bad
foo == 0
0 > foo
bar.baz > 0
# good
foo.zero?
foo.negative?
bar.baz.positive?
Example: EnforcedStyle: comparison
# bad
foo.zero?
foo.negative?
bar.baz.positive?
# good
foo == 0
0 > foo
bar.baz > 0
Use ms.positive?
instead of ms > 0
. Open
str += " #{ms}ms" if ms > 0
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for usage of comparison operators (==
,
>
, <
) to test numbers as zero, positive, or negative.
These can be replaced by their respective predicate methods.
The cop can also be configured to do the reverse.
The cop disregards #nonzero?
as it its value is truthy or falsey,
but not true
and false
, and thus not always interchangeable with
!= 0
.
The cop ignores comparisons to global variables, since they are often
populated with objects which can be compared with integers, but are
not themselves Interger
polymorphic.
Example: EnforcedStyle: predicate (default)
# bad
foo == 0
0 > foo
bar.baz > 0
# good
foo.zero?
foo.negative?
bar.baz.positive?
Example: EnforcedStyle: comparison
# bad
foo.zero?
foo.negative?
bar.baz.positive?
# good
foo == 0
0 > foo
bar.baz > 0
Use i.zero?
instead of i == 0
. Open
name = i == 0 ? :exception : :cause
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for usage of comparison operators (==
,
>
, <
) to test numbers as zero, positive, or negative.
These can be replaced by their respective predicate methods.
The cop can also be configured to do the reverse.
The cop disregards #nonzero?
as it its value is truthy or falsey,
but not true
and false
, and thus not always interchangeable with
!= 0
.
The cop ignores comparisons to global variables, since they are often
populated with objects which can be compared with integers, but are
not themselves Interger
polymorphic.
Example: EnforcedStyle: predicate (default)
# bad
foo == 0
0 > foo
bar.baz > 0
# good
foo.zero?
foo.negative?
bar.baz.positive?
Example: EnforcedStyle: comparison
# bad
foo.zero?
foo.negative?
bar.baz.positive?
# good
foo == 0
0 > foo
bar.baz > 0
Use hours.positive?
instead of hours > 0
. Open
if days > 0 || hours > 0 || minutes > 0
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for usage of comparison operators (==
,
>
, <
) to test numbers as zero, positive, or negative.
These can be replaced by their respective predicate methods.
The cop can also be configured to do the reverse.
The cop disregards #nonzero?
as it its value is truthy or falsey,
but not true
and false
, and thus not always interchangeable with
!= 0
.
The cop ignores comparisons to global variables, since they are often
populated with objects which can be compared with integers, but are
not themselves Interger
polymorphic.
Example: EnforcedStyle: predicate (default)
# bad
foo == 0
0 > foo
bar.baz > 0
# good
foo.zero?
foo.negative?
bar.baz.positive?
Example: EnforcedStyle: comparison
# bad
foo.zero?
foo.negative?
bar.baz.positive?
# good
foo == 0
0 > foo
bar.baz > 0
Use minutes.positive?
instead of minutes > 0
. Open
str += " #{minutes}m" if minutes > 0
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for usage of comparison operators (==
,
>
, <
) to test numbers as zero, positive, or negative.
These can be replaced by their respective predicate methods.
The cop can also be configured to do the reverse.
The cop disregards #nonzero?
as it its value is truthy or falsey,
but not true
and false
, and thus not always interchangeable with
!= 0
.
The cop ignores comparisons to global variables, since they are often
populated with objects which can be compared with integers, but are
not themselves Interger
polymorphic.
Example: EnforcedStyle: predicate (default)
# bad
foo == 0
0 > foo
bar.baz > 0
# good
foo.zero?
foo.negative?
bar.baz.positive?
Example: EnforcedStyle: comparison
# bad
foo.zero?
foo.negative?
bar.baz.positive?
# good
foo == 0
0 > foo
bar.baz > 0
Add an empty line after magic comments. Open
module Sapience
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Checks for a newline after the final magic comment.
Example:
# good
# frozen_string_literal: true
# Some documentation for Person
class Person
# Some code
end
# bad
# frozen_string_literal: true
# Some documentation for Person
class Person
# Some code
end
Prefer single-quoted strings when you don't need string interpolation or special symbols. Open
format((duration < 10.0 ? "%.3fms" : "%.1fms"), duration)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Checks if uses of quotes match the configured preference.
Example: EnforcedStyle: single_quotes (default)
# bad
"No special symbols"
"No string interpolation"
"Just text"
# good
'No special symbols'
'No string interpolation'
'Just text'
"Wait! What's #{this}!"
Example: EnforcedStyle: double_quotes
# bad
'Just some text'
'No special chars or interpolation'
# good
"Just some text"
"No special chars or interpolation"
"Every string in #{project} uses double_quotes"
Line is too long. [112/80] Open
# Structure for holding all log entries. We're using a struct because we want it to be fast and lightweight.
- Exclude checks
Use days.positive?
instead of days > 0
. Open
str += "#{days}d" if days > 0
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for usage of comparison operators (==
,
>
, <
) to test numbers as zero, positive, or negative.
These can be replaced by their respective predicate methods.
The cop can also be configured to do the reverse.
The cop disregards #nonzero?
as it its value is truthy or falsey,
but not true
and false
, and thus not always interchangeable with
!= 0
.
The cop ignores comparisons to global variables, since they are often
populated with objects which can be compared with integers, but are
not themselves Interger
polymorphic.
Example: EnforcedStyle: predicate (default)
# bad
foo == 0
0 > foo
bar.baz > 0
# good
foo.zero?
foo.negative?
bar.baz.positive?
Example: EnforcedStyle: comparison
# bad
foo.zero?
foo.negative?
bar.baz.positive?
# good
foo == 0
0 > foo
bar.baz > 0
Use minutes.positive?
instead of minutes > 0
. Open
if days > 0 || hours > 0 || minutes > 0
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for usage of comparison operators (==
,
>
, <
) to test numbers as zero, positive, or negative.
These can be replaced by their respective predicate methods.
The cop can also be configured to do the reverse.
The cop disregards #nonzero?
as it its value is truthy or falsey,
but not true
and false
, and thus not always interchangeable with
!= 0
.
The cop ignores comparisons to global variables, since they are often
populated with objects which can be compared with integers, but are
not themselves Interger
polymorphic.
Example: EnforcedStyle: predicate (default)
# bad
foo == 0
0 > foo
bar.baz > 0
# good
foo.zero?
foo.negative?
bar.baz.positive?
Example: EnforcedStyle: comparison
# bad
foo.zero?
foo.negative?
bar.baz.positive?
# good
foo == 0
0 > foo
bar.baz > 0
Prefer single-quoted strings when you don't need string interpolation or special symbols. Open
message.to_s.gsub(/(\e(\[([\d;]*[mz]?))?)?/, "").strip
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Checks if uses of quotes match the configured preference.
Example: EnforcedStyle: single_quotes (default)
# bad
"No special symbols"
"No string interpolation"
"Just text"
# good
'No special symbols'
'No string interpolation'
'Just text'
"Wait! What's #{this}!"
Example: EnforcedStyle: double_quotes
# bad
'Just some text'
'No special chars or interpolation'
# good
"Just some text"
"No special chars or interpolation"
"Every string in #{project} uses double_quotes"
Convert if
nested inside else
to elsif
. Open
if seconds >= 1.0
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
If the else
branch of a conditional consists solely of an if
node,
it can be combined with the else
to become an elsif
.
This helps to keep the nesting level from getting too deep.
Example:
# bad
if condition_a
action_a
else
if condition_b
action_b
else
action_c
end
end
# good
if condition_a
action_a
elsif condition_b
action_b
else
action_c
end
Prefer single-quoted strings when you don't need string interpolation or special symbols. Open
trace = ""
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Checks if uses of quotes match the configured preference.
Example: EnforcedStyle: single_quotes (default)
# bad
"No special symbols"
"No string interpolation"
"Just text"
# good
'No special symbols'
'No string interpolation'
'Just text'
"Wait! What's #{this}!"
Example: EnforcedStyle: double_quotes
# bad
'Just some text'
'No special chars or interpolation'
# good
"Just some text"
"No special chars or interpolation"
"Every string in #{project} uses double_quotes"
Prefer single-quoted strings when you don't need string interpolation or special symbols. Open
str = ""
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Checks if uses of quotes match the configured preference.
Example: EnforcedStyle: single_quotes (default)
# bad
"No special symbols"
"No string interpolation"
"Just text"
# good
'No special symbols'
'No string interpolation'
'Just text'
"Wait! What's #{this}!"
Example: EnforcedStyle: double_quotes
# bad
'Just some text'
'No special chars or interpolation'
# good
"Just some text"
"No special chars or interpolation"
"Every string in #{project} uses double_quotes"