Showing 19 of 19 total issues
File struct.ts
has 467 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
import { Err, Result } from "../result";
import { Type, CustomCommutativeAndType, Either, DefaultIntersect, Comment } from "../type";
import { GetType } from "../get-type";
/*
Function checkFields
has a Cognitive Complexity of 25 (exceeds 6 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private checkFields(val: any, checkFn: (t: Type<any>, val: any) => Result<any>, collect?: (key: string, val: any) => any): string[] {
const errs: string[] = [];
for(const prop in this.definition) {
const field = this.definition[prop]
if(!(prop in val)) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function stripOuterComments
has a Cognitive Complexity of 23 (exceeds 6 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function stripOuterComments(t: Kind | OptionalKey<any>): StrippedComments {
if(t instanceof OptionalKey) return stripOuterComments(t.type);
if(t instanceof Comment) {
const inner = stripOuterComments(t.wrapped);
return {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function mergeStructs
has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 6 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private mergeStructs(l: Struct<any>, r: Struct<any>) {
const definition: { [key: string]: FieldDef } = {};
for(const prop in l.definition) {
definition[prop] = l.definition[prop];
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function toTS
has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 6 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function toTS(type: Kind, opts: ToTypescriptOpts): string {
if(opts.useReference) {
for(const key in opts.useReference) {
const val = opts.useReference[key];
if(val === type) return key;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File to-jsonschema.ts
has 261 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
import { Type, Comment, Either, DefaultIntersect, Validation } from "./type";
import { TypeOf } from "./checks/type-of";
import { InstanceOf } from "./checks/instance-of";
import { Value } from "./checks/value";
import { Arr } from "./checks/array";
File to-ts.ts
has 259 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
import { Type, Comment, Either, DefaultIntersect, Validation } from "./type";
import { TypeOf } from "./checks/type-of";
import { InstanceOf } from "./checks/instance-of";
import { Value } from "./checks/value";
import { Arr } from "./checks/array";
Function fromStruct
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 6 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function fromStruct(s: Struct<any>, opts: ToTypescriptOpts) {
const lines = [ "{" ];
const keyOpts = {
...opts,
indentLevel: opts.indentLevel + 1,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function typeToSchema
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 6 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function typeToSchema(type: Kind, options: Required<Options>): JSONSchema {
if(type instanceof Comment) {
return {
description: formatCommentString(type.commentStr),
...typeToSchema(type.wrapped, options)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function mergeStructs
has 37 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private mergeStructs(l: Struct<any>, r: Struct<any>) {
const definition: { [key: string]: FieldDef } = {};
for(const prop in l.definition) {
definition[prop] = l.definition[prop];
Function fromStruct
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function fromStruct(s: Struct<any>, opts: ToTypescriptOpts) {
const lines = [ "{" ];
const keyOpts = {
...opts,
indentLevel: opts.indentLevel + 1,
Function typeToSchema
has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function typeToSchema(type: Kind, options: Required<Options>): JSONSchema {
if(type instanceof Comment) {
return {
description: formatCommentString(type.commentStr),
...typeToSchema(type.wrapped, options)
Function stripOuterComments
has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function stripOuterComments(t: Kind | OptionalKey<any>): StrippedComments {
if(t instanceof OptionalKey) return stripOuterComments(t.type);
if(t instanceof Comment) {
const inner = stripOuterComments(t.wrapped);
return {
Function checkFields
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private checkFields(val: any, checkFn: (t: Type<any>, val: any) => Result<any>, collect?: (key: string, val: any) => any): string[] {
const errs: string[] = [];
for(const prop in this.definition) {
const field = this.definition[prop]
if(!(prop in val)) {
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
const commentLines = commentStr.split("\n").map(line => {
return line.trim();
}).filter(line => line !== "");
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 55.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
const commentLines = commentStr.split("\n").map(line => {
return line.trim();
}).filter(line => line !== "");
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 55.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function and
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 6 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
and<Incoming>(type: Type<Incoming>): Type<T & Incoming> {
if(type instanceof MergeableType) {
// @ts-ignore
return new MergeIntersect(this, type);
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function handleNested
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 6 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function handleNested(kind: NestedType): Type<any> {
if(kind instanceof Struct) {
if(hasNested(kind)) return deepPartial(kind);
return new PartialStruct(kind);
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function toTypescript
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 6 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export function toTypescript(...args: SingleConversion | SingleConversionWithOpts | MultipleConversion): string {
if(args.length === 2) {
const [ type, userOpts ] = args;
const opts = Object.assign({ indent: " ", indentLevel: 0 }, userOpts);
// assignToType is only valid at the top level, so delete it if it exists
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"