Sign upLogin

relaton/relaton-nist

View on GitHub
Star

Showing 8 of 8 total issues

Class TechPubsParser has 25 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  class TechPubsParser
    RELATION_TYPES = {
      "replaces" => "obsoletes",
      "isVersionOf" => "editionOf",
      "hasTranslation" => "hasTranslation",
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/relaton_nist/tech_pubs_parser.rb - About 2 hrs to fix

    Method nistbib_results_filter has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

          def nistbib_results_filter(result, year, opts) # rubocop:disable Metrics/AbcSize, Metrics/MethodLength, Metrics/CyclomaticComplexity, Metrics/PerceivedComplexity
        missed_years = []
        iter = /\w+(?=PD)|(?<=PD-)\w+/.match(opts[:stage])&.to_s
        iteration = case iter
                    when "I" then "1"
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/relaton_nist/nist_bibliography.rb - About 2 hrs to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Method get has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

          def get(code, year = nil, opts = {}) # rubocop:disable Metrics/AbcSize, Metrics/MethodLength, Metrics/CyclomaticComplexity, Metrics/PerceivedComplexity
        return fetch_ref_err(code, year, []) if code.match?(/\sEP$/)

        /^(?<code2>[^(]+)(?:\((?<date2>\w+\s(?:\d{2},\s)?\d{4})\))?\s?\(?(?:(?<=\()(?<stage>(?:I|F|\d)PD))?/ =~ code
        stage ||= /(?<=\.)PD-\w+(?=\.)/.match(code)&.to_s
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/relaton_nist/nist_bibliography.rb - About 1 hr to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Method contributors_json has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

          def contributors_json(doc, role, lang = "en", script = "Latn") # rubocop:disable Metrics/AbcSize,Metrics/CyclomaticComplexity,Metrics/MethodLength,Metrics/PerceivedComplexity
        doc.map do |contr|
          if contr["affiliation"]
            if contr["affiliation"]["acronym"]
              abbrev = RelatonBib::LocalizedString.new(contr["affiliation"]["acronym"])
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/relaton_nist/scrapper.rb - About 1 hr to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Method forename_initial has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def forename_initial(person) # rubocop:disable Metrics/MethodLength, Metrics/AbcSize, Metrics/CyclomaticComplexity, Metrics/PerceivedComplexity
      fnames = []
      fname = person.at("given_name")&.text
      if fname
        if /^(?:(?<name>\w+)\s)?(?<inits>(?:\w(?:\.|\b)\s?)+)/ =~ fname
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/relaton_nist/tech_pubs_parser.rb - About 1 hr to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Method parse_date has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def parse_date
      @doc.xpath("publication_date|approval_date").map do |dt|
        on = dt.at("year").text
        if (m = dt.at "month")
          on += "-#{m.text}"
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/relaton_nist/tech_pubs_parser.rb - About 45 mins to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Method doc_relation has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

          def doc_relation(type, ref, uri, lang = "en", script = "Latn") # rubocop:disable Metrics/MethodLength
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/relaton_nist/scrapper.rb - About 35 mins to fix

      Method to_xml has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          def to_xml(**opts)
      super date_format: :short, **opts do |b|
        if opts[:bibdata]
          ext = b.ext do
            doctype&.to_xml b
      Severity: Minor
      Found in lib/relaton_nist/nist_bibliographic_item.rb - About 25 mins to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Severity
      Category
      Status
      Source
      Language