Showing 13 of 13 total issues
Class TechPubsParser
has 25 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class TechPubsParser
RELATION_TYPES = {
"replaces" => "obsoletes",
"isVersionOf" => "editionOf",
"hasTranslation" => "hasTranslation",
Method select_data
has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def select_data # rubocop:disable Metrics/AbcSize, Metrics/CyclomaticComplexity, Metrics/MethodLength,Metrics/PerceivedComplexity
return [] unless refparts[:code]
ref = "#{refparts[:series]} #{refparts[:code]}"
d = Date.strptime year, "%Y" if year
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method nistbib_results_filter
has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def nistbib_results_filter(result, year, opts) # rubocop:disable Metrics/AbcSize, Metrics/MethodLength, Metrics/CyclomaticComplexity, Metrics/PerceivedComplexity
missed_years = []
iter = /\w+(?=PD)|(?<=PD-)\w+/.match(opts[:stage])&.to_s
iteration = case iter
when "I" then "1"
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method get
has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def get(code, year = nil, opts = {}) # rubocop:disable Metrics/AbcSize, Metrics/MethodLength, Metrics/CyclomaticComplexity, Metrics/PerceivedComplexity
return fetch_ref_err(code, year, []) if code.match?(/\sEP$/)
/^(?<code2>[^(]+)(?:\((?<date2>\w+\s(?:\d{2},\s)?\d{4})\))?\s?\(?(?:(?<=\()(?<stage>(?:I|F|\d)PD))?/ =~ code
stage ||= /(?<=\.)PD-\w+(?=\.)/.match(code)&.to_s
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method contributors_json
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def contributors_json(doc, role, lang = "en", script = "Latn") # rubocop:disable Metrics/AbcSize,Metrics/CyclomaticComplexity,Metrics/MethodLength,Metrics/PerceivedComplexity
doc.map do |contr|
if contr["affiliation"]
if contr["affiliation"]["acronym"]
abbrev = RelatonBib::LocalizedString.new(contr["affiliation"]["acronym"])
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method forename_initial
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def forename_initial(person) # rubocop:disable Metrics/MethodLength, Metrics/AbcSize, Metrics/CyclomaticComplexity, Metrics/PerceivedComplexity
fnames = []
fname = person.at("given_name")&.text
if fname
if /^(?:(?<name>\w+)\s)?(?<inits>(?:\w(?:\.|\b)\s?)+)/ =~ fname
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method docidentifier
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def docidentifier(json) # rubocop:disable Metrics/AbcSize, Metrics/CyclomaticComplexity, Metrics/PerceivedComplexity, Metrics/MethodLength
parts = doi_parts(json) || code_parts(json["docidentifier"])
# return json["docidentifier"] unless parts
id = parts[:code]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method parse_date
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse_date
@doc.xpath("publication_date|approval_date").map do |dt|
on = dt.at("year").text
if (m = dt.at "month")
on += "-#{m.text}"
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method search_filter
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def search_filter # rubocop:disable Metrics/AbcSize,Metrics/CyclomaticComplexity,Metrics/PerceivedComplexity,Metrics/MethodLength
arr = @array.select do |item|
parts = doi_parts(item.hit[:json]) || code_parts(item.hit[:code])
iteration = item.hit.dig(:json, "iteration")
draft = parts[:draft] || (!iteration.nil? && iteration.match?(/\wpd/i))
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method doc_relation
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def doc_relation(type, ref, uri, lang = "en", script = "Latn") # rubocop:disable Metrics/MethodLength
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
{
# prefix: match(/^(?:NIST|NBS)\./, id),
series: match(/(?:SP|FIPS|CSWP|IR|ITL\sBulletin|White\sPaper)(?=\.)/, id),
code: match(/(?<=\.)\d+(?:-\d+)*(?:[[:alpha:]](?!\d|raft|er|t?\d))?/, id),
prt: match(/pt?(?<val>\d+)/, id),
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 35.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
{
# prefix: match(/^(?:NIST|NBS)\s?/, code),
series: match(/(?<val>(?:SP|FIPS|CSWP|IR|ITL\sBulletin|White\sPaper))\s/, code),
code: match(/(?<val>[0-9-]+(?:(?!(?:ver|r|v|pt)\d|-add\d?)[A-Za-z-])*|Research\sLibrary)/, code),
prt: match(/(?:pt|\sPart\s)(?<val>\d+)/, code),
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 35.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method to_xml
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def to_xml(**opts)
super date_format: :short, **opts do |b|
if opts[:bibdata]
ext = b.ext do
doctype&.to_xml b
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"