reset/ridley

View on GitHub

Showing 44 of 44 total issues

Method upload has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def upload(sandbox, chk_id, file)
      checksum = sandbox.checksum(chk_id)

      unless checksum[:needs_upload]
        return nil
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/ridley/sandbox_uploader.rb - About 45 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method load_root has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def load_root
        [].tap do |files|
          Dir.glob(path.join('*'), File::FNM_DOTMATCH).each do |file|
            next if File.directory?(file)
            next if ignored?(file)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/ridley/chef/cookbook.rb - About 45 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method _pv_kind_of has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def _pv_kind_of(opts, key, to_be)
        value = _pv_opts_lookup(opts, key)
        unless value.nil?
          passes = false
          Array(to_be).each do |tb|
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/ridley/mixin/params_validate.rb - About 45 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method add has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def add(severity, message = nil, progname = nil, &block)
        severity ||= Logger::UNKNOWN
        if @logdev.nil? or severity < @level
          return true
        end
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/ridley/logger.rb - About 45 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    def find(object)
      chef_id = object.respond_to?(:chef_id) ? object.chef_id : object
      new(request(:get, "#{self.class.resource_path}/#{chef_id}"))
    rescue AbortError => ex
      return nil if ex.cause.is_a?(Errors::HTTPNotFound)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/ridley/resource.rb and 1 other location - About 45 mins to fix
lib/ridley/resource.rb on lines 95..101

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 39.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    def delete(object)
      chef_id = object.respond_to?(:chef_id) ? object.chef_id : object
      new(request(:delete, "#{self.class.resource_path}/#{chef_id}"))
    rescue AbortError => ex
      return nil if ex.cause.is_a?(Errors::HTTPNotFound)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/ridley/resource.rb and 1 other location - About 45 mins to fix
lib/ridley/resource.rb on lines 74..80

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 39.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Method partial has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def partial(index, query_string, attributes, resources_registry, options = {})
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/ridley/resources/search_resource.rb - About 35 mins to fix

    Method chefignore has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

          def chefignore(path)
            Pathname.new(path).ascend do |dir|
              next unless dir.directory?
    
              [
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/ridley/chef/chefignore.rb - About 35 mins to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Method upload has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def upload(path, options = {})
          options  = options.reverse_merge(validate: true, force: false, freeze: false)
          cookbook = Ridley::Chef::Cookbook.from_path(path)
    
          unless (existing = find(cookbook.cookbook_name, cookbook.version)).nil?
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/ridley/resources/cookbook_resource.rb - About 35 mins to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Method _pv_required has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

          def _pv_required(opts, key, is_required=true)
            if is_required
              if (opts.has_key?(key.to_s) && !opts[key.to_s].nil?) ||
                  (opts.has_key?(key.to_sym) && !opts[key.to_sym].nil?)
                true
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/ridley/mixin/params_validate.rb - About 35 mins to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Method validate has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def validate
          raise IOError, "No Cookbook found at: #{path}" unless path.exist?
    
          unless syntax_checker.validate_ruby_files
            raise Ridley::Errors::CookbookSyntaxError, "Invalid ruby files in cookbook: #{cookbook_name} (#{version})."
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/ridley/chef/cookbook.rb - About 25 mins to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Method find has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def find(data_bag, object)
          chef_id = object.respond_to?(:chef_id) ? object.chef_id : object
          new(data_bag).from_hash(request(:get, "#{DataBagResource.resource_path}/#{data_bag.name}/#{chef_id}"))
        rescue AbortError => ex
          return nil if ex.cause.is_a?(Errors::HTTPNotFound)
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/ridley/resources/data_bag_item_resource.rb - About 25 mins to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Method delete has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def delete(data_bag, object)
          chef_id = object.respond_to?(:chef_id) ? object.chef_id : object
          new(data_bag).from_hash(request(:delete, "#{DataBagResource.resource_path}/#{data_bag.name}/#{chef_id}"))
        rescue AbortError => ex
          return nil if ex.cause.is_a?(Errors::HTTPNotFound)
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/ridley/resources/data_bag_item_resource.rb - About 25 mins to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Method _pv_callbacks has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

          def _pv_callbacks(opts, key, callbacks)
            raise ArgumentError, "Callback list must be a hash!" unless callbacks.kind_of?(Hash)
            value = _pv_opts_lookup(opts, key)
            if value != nil
              callbacks.each do |message, zeproc|
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/ridley/mixin/params_validate.rb - About 25 mins to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Method find has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def find(object)
          chef_id = object.respond_to?(:chef_id) ? object.chef_id : object
          request(:get, "#{self.class.resource_path}/#{chef_id}")
          new(name: chef_id)
        rescue AbortError => ex
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/ridley/resources/data_bag_resource.rb - About 25 mins to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Method find has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def find(object)
          chef_id = object.respond_to?(:chef_id) ? object.chef_id : object
          new(request(:get, "#{self.class.resource_path}/#{chef_id}"))
        rescue AbortError => ex
          return nil if ex.cause.is_a?(Errors::HTTPNotFound)
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/ridley/resource.rb - About 25 mins to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Method find has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def find(object, version)
          chef_id = object.respond_to?(:chef_id) ? object.chef_id : object
          new(request(:get, "#{self.class.resource_path}/#{chef_id}/#{version}"))
        rescue AbortError => ex
          return nil if ex.cause.is_a?(Errors::HTTPNotFound)
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/ridley/resources/cookbook_resource.rb - About 25 mins to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Method cookbook_versions has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def cookbook_versions(environment, run_list = [])
          run_list = Array(run_list).flatten
          chef_id  = environment.respond_to?(:chef_id) ? environment.chef_id : environment
          request(:post, "#{self.class.resource_path}/#{chef_id}/cookbook_versions", JSON.fast_generate(run_list: run_list))
        rescue AbortError => ex
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/ridley/resources/environment_resource.rb - About 25 mins to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Method _pv_respond_to has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

          def _pv_respond_to(opts, key, method_name_list)
            value = _pv_opts_lookup(opts, key)
            unless value.nil?
              Array(method_name_list).each do |method_name|
                unless value.respond_to?(method_name)
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/ridley/mixin/params_validate.rb - About 25 mins to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Method initialize has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

          def initialize(cookbook = nil, maintainer = 'YOUR_COMPANY_NAME', maintainer_email = 'YOUR_EMAIL', license = 'none')
            @cookbook = cookbook
            @name = cookbook ? cookbook.name : ""
            @long_description = ""
            self.maintainer(maintainer)
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/ridley/chef/cookbook/metadata.rb - About 25 mins to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Severity
    Category
    Status
    Source
    Language