Showing 240 of 240 total issues
Cyclomatic complexity for set is too high. [7/6] Open
def set(key, value = nil, &blk)
key = key.to_sym
fail ArgumentError, "unknown option #{key.inspect}" unless build_opts.key?(key)
fail ArgumentError, 'one of value or block is required' if value.nil? && blk.nil?
fail ArgumentError, 'only one of value or block may be provided' if value && blk
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.
An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one.
Assignment Branch Condition size for build_tar_from_source! is too high. [16.31/15] Open
def build_tar_from_source!
buffer = StringIO.new
log_info("Processing #{source_files.size} files in tree")
TarWriter.new(buffer) do |tar|
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the ABC size of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The ABC size is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions. See http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?AbcMetric
Method add
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def add(severity, message = nil, progname = nil, &block)
annotation = nil
indent = 0
if message.nil?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method parse!
has 41 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.parse!(args)
opts = new
parser = OptionParser.new do |cfg|
cfg.banner = "Usage: #{$PROGRAM_NAME} [options...] [drydock-filename]"
Method find
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.find(path, ignorefile, prepend_path: false, recursive: true)
path = path.sub(%r{/$}, '')
[].tap do |results|
::Find.find(path) do |subpath|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method add
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def add(severity, message = nil, progname = nil, &block)
annotation = nil
indent = 0
if message.nil?
Block has too many lines. [35/25] Open
parser = OptionParser.new do |cfg|
cfg.banner = "Usage: #{$PROGRAM_NAME} [options...] [drydock-filename]"
cfg.separator ''
cfg.separator 'Runtime / build options:'
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks if the length of a block exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable. The cop can be configured to ignore blocks passed to certain methods.
Method to_h
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def to_h
{}.tap do |commit|
if opts.key?(:command)
commit['run'] ||= {}
commit['run'][:Cmd] = opts[:command]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method initialize
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize(file_or_filename, dotfiles: false)
@dotfiles = dotfiles
if file_or_filename.respond_to?(:readlines)
patterns = Array(file_or_filename.readlines)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method propagate_config!
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.propagate_config!(src_image, config_name, opts, opt_key)
if opts.key?(opt_key)
Drydock.logger.info("Command override: #{opts[opt_key].inspect}")
else
src_image.refresh!
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method write_to_container
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def write_to_container(buffer, digest)
label = "# COPY #{recursive ? 'dir' : 'file'}:md5:#{digest} TO #{target_path}"
chain.run(label, no_cache: no_cache) do |container|
target_stat = container.archive_head(target_path)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method archive_head
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def archive_head(path = '/', &blk)
query = { 'path' => path }
response = connection.raw_request(:head, path_for(:archive), query, response_block: blk)
return if response.nil?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return false if self['Tty'] != other['Tty']
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return false if (self['Labels'] || {}) != (other['Labels'] || {})
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return false if Array(self['Env']).sort != Array(other['Env']).sort
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return true
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return false if self['Cmd'] != other['Cmd']
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return false unless other_vols.key?(my_vol)
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return false unless other_ports.key?(my_port)
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return false if self['Entrypoint'] != other['Entrypoint']