Sign upLogin

rloomans/new-teamtemp

View on GitHub
Star
teamtemp/views.py

Summary

Maintainability
F
1 wk
Test Coverage
C
71%

File views.py has 1181 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

from __future__ import division, print_function

from builtins import range, str
import errno
import sys
Severity: Major
Found in teamtemp/views.py - About 3 days to fix

    Function set_view has a Cognitive Complexity of 58 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    def set_view(request, survey_id):
    survey = get_object_or_404(TeamTemperature, pk=survey_id)

    timezone.activate(pytz.timezone(survey.default_tz or 'UTC'))
    Severity: Minor
    Found in teamtemp/views.py - About 1 day to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Function populate_chart_data_structures has a Cognitive Complexity of 48 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    def populate_chart_data_structures(
        survey_type_title,
        teams,
        team_history,
        tz='UTC'):
    Severity: Minor
    Found in teamtemp/views.py - About 7 hrs to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function set_view. (21)
    Open

    @ie_edge()
@csp_update(SCRIPT_SRC=["'unsafe-inline'", ],
            IMG_SRC=["'self'", 'data:', 'blob:', 'code.jquery.com', ],)
def set_view(request, survey_id):
    survey = get_object_or_404(TeamTemperature, pk=survey_id)
    Severity: Minor
    Found in teamtemp/views.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function bvc_view. (21)
    Open

    @ie_edge()
@csp_update(
    SCRIPT_SRC=[
        '*.google.com',
        '*.googleapis.com',
    Severity: Minor
    Found in teamtemp/views.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function populate_chart_data_structures. (20)
    Open

    def populate_chart_data_structures(
        survey_type_title,
        teams,
        team_history,
        tz='UTC'):
    Severity: Minor
    Found in teamtemp/views.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Function populate_bvc_data has a Cognitive Complexity of 28 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    def populate_bvc_data(
        survey,
        team_name,
        archive_id,
        num_iterations=0,
    Severity: Minor
    Found in teamtemp/views.py - About 4 hrs to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Function team_view has a Cognitive Complexity of 26 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    def team_view(request, survey_id, team_name=None):
    survey = get_object_or_404(TeamTemperature, pk=survey_id)

    if not authenticated_user(request, survey):
        return redirect(
    Severity: Minor
    Found in teamtemp/views.py - About 3 hrs to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function cached_word_cloud. (15)
    Open

    def cached_word_cloud(word_list=None, word_hash=None, generate=True, width=None, height=None):
    if not width:
        width = DEFAULT_WORDCLOUD_WIDTH
    if not height:
        height= DEFAULT_WORDCLOUD_HEIGHT
    Severity: Minor
    Found in teamtemp/views.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function populate_bvc_data. (14)
    Open

    def populate_bvc_data(
        survey,
        team_name,
        archive_id,
        num_iterations=0,
    Severity: Minor
    Found in teamtemp/views.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function submit_view. (14)
    Open

    @ie_edge()
def submit_view(request, survey_id, team_name=''):
    user = get_or_create_user(request)

    survey = get_object_or_404(TeamTemperature, pk=survey_id)
    Severity: Minor
    Found in teamtemp/views.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function team_view. (13)
    Open

    @ie_edge()
def team_view(request, survey_id, team_name=None):
    survey = get_object_or_404(TeamTemperature, pk=survey_id)

    if not authenticated_user(request, survey):
    Severity: Minor
    Found in teamtemp/views.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Function cached_word_cloud has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    def cached_word_cloud(word_list=None, word_hash=None, generate=True, width=None, height=None):
    if not width:
        width = DEFAULT_WORDCLOUD_WIDTH
    if not height:
        height= DEFAULT_WORDCLOUD_HEIGHT
    Severity: Minor
    Found in teamtemp/views.py - About 2 hrs to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function generate_bvc_stats. (11)
    Open

    def generate_bvc_stats(survey, team_name_list, archive_date, num_iterations=0):
    # Generate Stats for Team Temp Average for gauge and wordcloud - look here for Gauge and Word Cloud
    # BVC.html uses stats.count and stats.average.score__avg and cached word
    # cloud uses stats.words below
    Severity: Minor
    Found in teamtemp/views.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function wordcloud_view. (10)
    Open

    @no_cache()
@csp_exempt
def wordcloud_view(request, word_hash='', width=None, height=None):
    if width:
        width = int(width)
    Severity: Minor
    Found in teamtemp/views.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Function submit_view has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    def submit_view(request, survey_id, team_name=''):
    user = get_or_create_user(request)

    survey = get_object_or_404(TeamTemperature, pk=survey_id)
    Severity: Minor
    Found in teamtemp/views.py - About 2 hrs to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Function bvc_view has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    def bvc_view(
        request,
        survey_id,
        team_name='',
        archive_id='',
    Severity: Minor
    Found in teamtemp/views.py - About 2 hrs to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function archive_survey. (9)
    Open

    @transaction.atomic
def archive_survey(_, survey, archive_date=timezone.now()):
    timezone.activate(pytz.timezone(survey.default_tz or 'UTC'))

    print("Archiving %s: Archive Date %s UTC" %
    Severity: Minor
    Found in teamtemp/views.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function prune_word_cloud_cache. (9)
    Open

    def prune_word_cloud_cache(_):
    timezone.activate(datetime.timezone.utc)
    print("prune_word_cloud_cache: Start at %s" %
          utc_timestamp(), file=sys.stderr)
    Severity: Minor
    Found in teamtemp/views.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function login_view. (8)
    Open

    @no_cache()
@ie_edge()
def login_view(request, survey_id, redirect_to=None):
    survey = get_object_or_404(TeamTemperature, pk=survey_id)
    Severity: Minor
    Found in teamtemp/views.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Function prune_word_cloud_cache has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    def prune_word_cloud_cache(_):
    timezone.activate(datetime.timezone.utc)
    print("prune_word_cloud_cache: Start at %s" %
          utc_timestamp(), file=sys.stderr)
    Severity: Minor
    Found in teamtemp/views.py - About 2 hrs to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Function wordcloud_view has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    def wordcloud_view(request, word_hash='', width=None, height=None):
    if width:
        width = int(width)
        if not (0 < width <= MAX_WORDCLOUD_WIDTH and is_multiple_of_50(width)):
            return HttpResponseBadRequest(reason="width out of range")
    Severity: Minor
    Found in teamtemp/views.py - About 1 hr to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Function login_view has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    def login_view(request, survey_id, redirect_to=None):
    survey = get_object_or_404(TeamTemperature, pk=survey_id)

    def _password_setter(password):
        #password = password.encode('utf-8')
    Severity: Minor
    Found in teamtemp/views.py - About 1 hr to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Function bvc_view has 8 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    def bvc_view(
    Severity: Major
    Found in teamtemp/views.py - About 1 hr to fix

      Function populate_bvc_data has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

      def populate_bvc_data(
      Severity: Major
      Found in teamtemp/views.py - About 50 mins to fix

        Function get_or_create_user has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

        def get_or_create_user(request):
    userid = responses.get_userid(request)

    if userid:
        user, _ = User.objects.get_or_create(id=userid)
        Severity: Minor
        Found in teamtemp/views.py - About 45 mins to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Function generate_bvc_stats has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

        def generate_bvc_stats(survey, team_name_list, archive_date, num_iterations=0):
    # Generate Stats for Team Temp Average for gauge and wordcloud - look here for Gauge and Word Cloud
    # BVC.html uses stats.count and stats.average.score__avg and cached word
    # cloud uses stats.words below
        Severity: Minor
        Found in teamtemp/views.py - About 45 mins to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.
        Open

                            if team:
                        if new_team_name != team.team_name:
                            rows_changed = change_team_name(
                                team.team_name, new_team_name, survey.id)
                            messages.success(
        Severity: Major
        Found in teamtemp/views.py - About 45 mins to fix

          Function cached_word_cloud has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

          def cached_word_cloud(word_list=None, word_hash=None, generate=True, width=None, height=None):
          Severity: Minor
          Found in teamtemp/views.py - About 35 mins to fix

            Function archive_survey has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
            Open

            def archive_survey(_, survey, archive_date=timezone.now()):
    timezone.activate(pytz.timezone(survey.default_tz or 'UTC'))

    print("Archiving %s: Archive Date %s UTC" %
          (survey.id, str(archive_date)), file=sys.stderr)
            Severity: Minor
            Found in teamtemp/views.py - About 35 mins to fix

            Cognitive Complexity

            Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

            A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

            • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
            • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
            • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

            Further reading

            Function calc_multi_iteration_average has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
            Open

            def calc_multi_iteration_average(
        team_name,
        survey,
        num_iterations=2,
        tz='UTC'):
            Severity: Minor
            Found in teamtemp/views.py - About 25 mins to fix

            Cognitive Complexity

            Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

            A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

            • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
            • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
            • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

            Further reading

            Function reset_view has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
            Open

            def reset_view(request, survey_id):
    survey = get_object_or_404(TeamTemperature, pk=survey_id)

    timezone.activate(pytz.timezone(survey.default_tz or 'UTC'))
            Severity: Minor
            Found in teamtemp/views.py - About 25 mins to fix

            Cognitive Complexity

            Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

            A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

            • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
            • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
            • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

            Further reading

            TODO found
            Open

                            # TODO can it recalculate the average here for adhoc filtering
            Severity: Minor
            Found in teamtemp/views.py by fixme

            Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
            Open

                                row['Average'] = (
                        average_score,
                        "%.2f (%s%d Response%s)" %
                        (average_score,
                         "Min: %.2f, Max: %.2f, " %
            Severity: Major
            Found in teamtemp/views.py and 1 other location - About 2 hrs to fix
            teamtemp/views.py on lines 1013..1021

            Duplicated Code

            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

            Tuning

            This issue has a mass of 52.

            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

            Refactorings

            Further Reading

            Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
            Open

                row['Average'] = (
        average_score,
        "%.2f (%s%d Response%s)" %
        (average_score,
         "Min: %.2f, Max: %.2f, " %
            Severity: Major
            Found in teamtemp/views.py and 1 other location - About 2 hrs to fix
            teamtemp/views.py on lines 972..980

            Duplicated Code

            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

            Tuning

            This issue has a mass of 52.

            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

            Refactorings

            Further Reading

            Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
            Open

                if height:
        height = int(height)
        if not (0 < height <= MAX_WORDCLOUD_HEIGHT and is_multiple_of_50(height)):
            return HttpResponseBadRequest(reason="height out of range")
            Severity: Major
            Found in teamtemp/views.py and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
            teamtemp/views.py on lines 1319..1322

            Duplicated Code

            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

            Tuning

            This issue has a mass of 47.

            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

            Refactorings

            Further Reading

            Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
            Open

                if width:
        width = int(width)
        if not (0 < width <= MAX_WORDCLOUD_WIDTH and is_multiple_of_50(width)):
            return HttpResponseBadRequest(reason="width out of range")
            Severity: Major
            Found in teamtemp/views.py and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
            teamtemp/views.py on lines 1323..1326

            Duplicated Code

            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

            Tuning

            This issue has a mass of 47.

            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

            Refactorings

            Further Reading

            Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
            Open

                    if dept_name != '':
            dept_name_list = dept_name.split(',')
            dept_filter = dict(
                {'dept_name__in': dept_name_list}, **site_filter)
        else:
            Severity: Major
            Found in teamtemp/views.py and 2 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
            teamtemp/views.py on lines 1099..1104
            teamtemp/views.py on lines 1106..1111

            Duplicated Code

            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

            Tuning

            This issue has a mass of 42.

            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

            Refactorings

            Further Reading

            Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
            Open

                    if region_name != '':
            region_name_list = region_name.split(',')
            region_filter = dict(
                {'region_name__in': region_name_list}, **survey_filter)
        else:
            Severity: Major
            Found in teamtemp/views.py and 2 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
            teamtemp/views.py on lines 1106..1111
            teamtemp/views.py on lines 1113..1118

            Duplicated Code

            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

            Tuning

            This issue has a mass of 42.

            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

            Refactorings

            Further Reading

            Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
            Open

                    if site_name != '':
            site_name_list = site_name.split(',')
            site_filter = dict(
                {'site_name__in': site_name_list}, **region_filter)
        else:
            Severity: Major
            Found in teamtemp/views.py and 2 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
            teamtemp/views.py on lines 1099..1104
            teamtemp/views.py on lines 1113..1118

            Duplicated Code

            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

            Tuning

            This issue has a mass of 42.

            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

            Refactorings

            Further Reading

            Similar blocks of code found in 6 locations. Consider refactoring.
            Open

                        if srf['survey_type'] != survey.survey_type:
                survey.survey_type = srf['survey_type']
                messages.success(request, 'Survey Type Updated.')
            Severity: Major
            Found in teamtemp/views.py and 5 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
            teamtemp/views.py on lines 257..259
            teamtemp/views.py on lines 260..262
            teamtemp/views.py on lines 263..265
            teamtemp/views.py on lines 266..268
            teamtemp/views.py on lines 269..271

            Duplicated Code

            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

            Tuning

            This issue has a mass of 41.

            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

            Refactorings

            Further Reading

            Similar blocks of code found in 6 locations. Consider refactoring.
            Open

                        if srf['site_names'] != survey.site_names:
                survey.site_names = srf['site_names']
                messages.success(request, 'Site Names Updated.')
            Severity: Major
            Found in teamtemp/views.py and 5 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
            teamtemp/views.py on lines 254..256
            teamtemp/views.py on lines 257..259
            teamtemp/views.py on lines 260..262
            teamtemp/views.py on lines 266..268
            teamtemp/views.py on lines 269..271

            Duplicated Code

            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

            Tuning

            This issue has a mass of 41.

            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

            Refactorings

            Further Reading

            Similar blocks of code found in 6 locations. Consider refactoring.
            Open

                        if srf['region_names'] != survey.region_names:
                survey.region_names = srf['region_names']
                messages.success(request, 'Region Names Updated.')
            Severity: Major
            Found in teamtemp/views.py and 5 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
            teamtemp/views.py on lines 254..256
            teamtemp/views.py on lines 257..259
            teamtemp/views.py on lines 263..265
            teamtemp/views.py on lines 266..268
            teamtemp/views.py on lines 269..271

            Duplicated Code

            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

            Tuning

            This issue has a mass of 41.

            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

            Refactorings

            Further Reading

            Similar blocks of code found in 6 locations. Consider refactoring.
            Open

                        if srf['default_tz'] != survey.default_tz:
                survey.default_tz = srf['default_tz']
                messages.success(request, 'Default Timezone Updated.')
            Severity: Major
            Found in teamtemp/views.py and 5 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
            teamtemp/views.py on lines 254..256
            teamtemp/views.py on lines 257..259
            teamtemp/views.py on lines 260..262
            teamtemp/views.py on lines 263..265
            teamtemp/views.py on lines 269..271

            Duplicated Code

            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

            Tuning

            This issue has a mass of 41.

            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

            Refactorings

            Further Reading

            Similar blocks of code found in 6 locations. Consider refactoring.
            Open

                        if srf['dept_names'] != survey.dept_names:
                survey.dept_names = srf['dept_names']
                messages.success(request, 'Dept Names Updated.')
            Severity: Major
            Found in teamtemp/views.py and 5 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
            teamtemp/views.py on lines 254..256
            teamtemp/views.py on lines 260..262
            teamtemp/views.py on lines 263..265
            teamtemp/views.py on lines 266..268
            teamtemp/views.py on lines 269..271

            Duplicated Code

            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

            Tuning

            This issue has a mass of 41.

            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

            Refactorings

            Further Reading

            Similar blocks of code found in 6 locations. Consider refactoring.
            Open

                        if srf['max_word_count'] != survey.max_word_count:
                survey.max_word_count = srf['max_word_count']
                messages.success(request, 'Max Word Count Updated.')
            Severity: Major
            Found in teamtemp/views.py and 5 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
            teamtemp/views.py on lines 254..256
            teamtemp/views.py on lines 257..259
            teamtemp/views.py on lines 260..262
            teamtemp/views.py on lines 263..265
            teamtemp/views.py on lines 266..268

            Duplicated Code

            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

            Tuning

            This issue has a mass of 41.

            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

            Refactorings

            Further Reading

            Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
            Open

                if stats['maximum']['score__max']:
        agg_stats['maximum'] = stats['maximum']['score__max']
            Severity: Major
            Found in teamtemp/views.py and 2 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
            teamtemp/views.py on lines 1264..1265
            teamtemp/views.py on lines 1266..1267

            Duplicated Code

            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

            Tuning

            This issue has a mass of 39.

            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

            Refactorings

            Further Reading

            Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
            Open

                if stats['minimum']['score__min']:
        agg_stats['minimum'] = stats['minimum']['score__min']
            Severity: Major
            Found in teamtemp/views.py and 2 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
            teamtemp/views.py on lines 1264..1265
            teamtemp/views.py on lines 1268..1269

            Duplicated Code

            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

            Tuning

            This issue has a mass of 39.

            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

            Refactorings

            Further Reading

            Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
            Open

                if stats['average']['score__avg']:
        agg_stats['average'] = stats['average']['score__avg']
            Severity: Major
            Found in teamtemp/views.py and 2 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
            teamtemp/views.py on lines 1266..1267
            teamtemp/views.py on lines 1268..1269

            Duplicated Code

            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

            Tuning

            This issue has a mass of 39.

            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

            Refactorings

            Further Reading

            There are no issues that match your filters.

            Category
            Status