Class ChurnbasedRoutingTable has 35 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class ChurnbasedRoutingTable < RoutingTable
include Routing::RandomPartitioner
attr :fnameFile cb_rttable.rb has 331 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
require 'roma/routing/rttable'
require 'roma/routing/random_partitioner'
module Roma
module RoutingMethod leave has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def leave(nid)
unless @enabled_failover
return
end
return unless @rd.nodes.include?(nid)- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method leave has 39 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def leave(nid)
unless @enabled_failover
return
end
return unless @rd.nodes.include?(nid)Method vnode_balance has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def vnode_balance(ap)
# amount of primary at node = amount of vnode / amount of node
n = (2**div_bits) / nodes.length
pcount = scount = 0- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method sample_vnode has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def sample_vnode(without_nodes)
short_idx = {}
idx = {}
@rd.v_idx.each_pair{|vn, nids|
unless list_include?(nids, without_nodes)- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method set_route has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def set_route(vn, clk, nids)
return "#{vn} is not found." unless @rd.v_idx.key?(vn)
@lock.synchronize {
return "It's old table." if @rd.v_clk[vn] > clk
nids.each{ |nid|- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method can_i_release? has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def can_i_release?(ap_str, rep_host)
buf = self.nodes
buf.delete(ap_str)
hosts = []
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method search_lost_vnodes has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def search_lost_vnodes(t)
ret = []
@rd.each_log_all(@fname){|log_t,line|
next if t > log_t
s = line.split(/ /)- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if log_list.length==0
@log_name="#{@fname}.1"
else
if File::stat("#{@fname}.#{log_list.last[0]}").size == 0
@log_name="#{@fname}.#{log_list.last[0]}"- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 47.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76