lib/roma/tools/recoverlost_lib.rb

Summary

Maintainability
D
1 day
Test Coverage

File recoverlost_lib.rb has 291 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

require 'roma/client/sender'
require 'roma/messaging/con_pool'
require 'roma/routing/routing_data'

module Roma
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/roma/tools/recoverlost_lib.rb - About 3 hrs to fix

    Method upload_data2 has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def upload_data2(hname, nid, keys)
          con = Roma::Messaging::ConPool.instance.get_connection(nid)
    
          cmd = "#{@pushv_cmd} #{hname} 0\r\n"
          con.write(cmd)
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/roma/tools/recoverlost_lib.rb - About 2 hrs to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Method start_recover has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def start_recover(hname)
          @lost_vnodes.each_with_index{|vn, idx|
            nodes = @rd.v_idx[vn]
            if nodes == nil || nodes.length == 0
              nids = []
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/roma/tools/recoverlost_lib.rb - About 1 hr to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Method upload_data2 has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def upload_data2(hname, nid, keys)
          con = Roma::Messaging::ConPool.instance.get_connection(nid)
    
          cmd = "#{@pushv_cmd} #{hname} 0\r\n"
          con.write(cmd)
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/roma/tools/recoverlost_lib.rb - About 1 hr to fix

      Method broadcast_cmd has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          def broadcast_cmd(cmd,without_nids=nil)
            without_nids=[] unless without_nids
            res = {}
            @rd.nodes.each{ |nid|
              res[nid] = send_cmd(nid,cmd) unless without_nids.include?(nid)
      Severity: Minor
      Found in lib/roma/tools/recoverlost_lib.rb - About 45 mins to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Method upload_data has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          def upload_data(hname, vn, nid, k, data)
            con = Roma::Messaging::ConPool.instance.get_connection(nid)
      
            cmd = "#{@pushv_cmd} #{hname} #{vn}\r\n"
            con.write(cmd)
      Severity: Minor
      Found in lib/roma/tools/recoverlost_lib.rb - About 45 mins to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Method upload_data has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          def upload_data(hname, vn, nid, k, data)
      Severity: Minor
      Found in lib/roma/tools/recoverlost_lib.rb - About 35 mins to fix

        Method initialize has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

            def initialize(pname, pushv_cmd, argv, alldata = false)
              if alldata == false && argv.length < 4
                puts "usage:#{pname} address port storage-path [yyyymmddhhmmss]"
                exit
              end
        Severity: Minor
        Found in lib/roma/tools/recoverlost_lib.rb - About 35 mins to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

                if val
                  wd = [vn, last, 0, expt, k.length, k, val.length, val].pack("NNNNNa#{k.length}Na#{val.length}")
                else
                  wd = [vn, last, 0, expt, k.length, k, 0].pack("NNNNNa#{k.length}N")
        Severity: Minor
        Found in lib/roma/tools/recoverlost_lib.rb and 1 other location - About 45 mins to fix
        lib/roma/tools/recoverlost_lib.rb on lines 290..293

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 39.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

              if val
                wd = [vn, last, 0, expt, k.length, k, val.length, val].pack("NNNNNa#{k.length}Na#{val.length}")
              else
                wd = [vn, last, 0, expt, k.length, k, 0].pack("NNNNNa#{k.length}N")
        Severity: Minor
        Found in lib/roma/tools/recoverlost_lib.rb and 1 other location - About 45 mins to fix
        lib/roma/tools/recoverlost_lib.rb on lines 239..242

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 39.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        Identical blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

            def new_storage(ext)
              case(ext)
              when 'tc'
                return ::Roma::Storage::TCStorage.new
              when 'dbm'
        Severity: Minor
        Found in lib/roma/tools/recoverlost_lib.rb and 3 other locations - About 25 mins to fix
        lib/roma/tools/key_access.rb on lines 88..97
        lib/roma/tools/key_list.rb on lines 66..75
        lib/roma/tools/mkrecent.rb on lines 120..129

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 30.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        Identical blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

            def each_hash(path)
              Dir::glob("#{path}/*").each{|dir|
                next unless File::directory?(dir)
                hname = dir[dir.rindex('/')+1..-1]
                yield hname,dir
        Severity: Minor
        Found in lib/roma/tools/recoverlost_lib.rb and 2 other locations - About 25 mins to fix
        lib/roma/tools/key_access.rb on lines 61..66
        lib/roma/tools/key_list.rb on lines 39..44

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 30.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        There are no issues that match your filters.

        Category
        Status