rubinius/rubinius

View on GitHub
core/module.rb

Summary

Maintainability
F
5 days
Test Coverage

File module.rb has 571 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

class Module

  attr_reader :constant_table
  attr_writer :method_table

Severity: Major
Found in core/module.rb - About 1 day to fix

    Class Module has 61 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    class Module
    
      attr_reader :constant_table
      attr_writer :method_table
    
    
    Severity: Major
    Found in core/module.rb - About 1 day to fix

      Method public_instance_method has a Cognitive Complexity of 24 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

        def public_instance_method(name)
          name = Rubinius::Type.coerce_to_symbol name
      
          mod = self
          while mod
      Severity: Minor
      Found in core/module.rb - About 3 hrs to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Method instance_method has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

        def instance_method(name)
          name = Rubinius::Type.coerce_to_symbol name
      
          mod = self
          while mod
      Severity: Minor
      Found in core/module.rb - About 2 hrs to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Method add_ivars has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

        def add_ivars(code)
          case code
          when Rubinius::CompiledCode
            new_ivars = code.literals.select { |l| l.kind_of?(Symbol) and l.is_ivar? }
            return if new_ivars.empty?
      Severity: Minor
      Found in core/module.rb - About 2 hrs to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Method filter_methods has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

        def filter_methods(filter, all)
          ary = []
          if all and self.direct_superclass
            table = Rubinius::LookupTable.new
            mod = self
      Severity: Minor
      Found in core/module.rb - About 2 hrs to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Method instance_methods has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

        def instance_methods(all=true)
          ary = []
          if all
            table = Rubinius::LookupTable.new
      
      
      Severity: Minor
      Found in core/module.rb - About 2 hrs to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Method constants has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

        def constants(all=undefined)
          tbl = Rubinius::LookupTable.new
      
          @constant_table.each do |name, constant, visibility|
            tbl[name] = true unless visibility == :private
      Severity: Minor
      Found in core/module.rb - About 2 hrs to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Method attr has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

        def attr(*attributes)
          vis = Rubinius::VariableScope.of_sender.method_visibility
      
          if attributes.size == 2 && (attributes.last.is_a?(TrueClass) || attributes.last.is_a?(FalseClass))
            name = attributes.first
      Severity: Minor
      Found in core/module.rb - About 1 hr to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Method lookup_method has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

        def lookup_method(sym, check_object_too=true, trim_im=true)
          mod = self
      
          while mod
            if mod == mod.origin && entry = mod.method_table.lookup(sym.to_sym)
      Severity: Minor
      Found in core/module.rb - About 45 mins to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Method remove_const has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

        def remove_const(name)
          unless name.kind_of? Symbol
            name = StringValue name
      
            unless Rubinius::CType.isupper name.getbyte(0)
      Severity: Minor
      Found in core/module.rb - About 45 mins to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Method < has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

        def <(other)
          unless other.kind_of? Module
            raise TypeError, "compared with non class/module"
          end
      
      
      Severity: Minor
      Found in core/module.rb - About 35 mins to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Method initialize_copy has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

        def initialize_copy(other)
          # If the method table is already different, we already
          # initialized this module.
          unless @method_table == other.method_table
            raise TypeError, "already initialized module"
      Severity: Minor
      Found in core/module.rb - About 25 mins to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Method <=> has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

        def <=>(other)
          return 0 if self.equal? other
          return nil unless other.kind_of? Module
      
          lt = self < other
      Severity: Minor
      Found in core/module.rb - About 25 mins to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

        def private_constant(*names)
          names = names.map(&:to_sym)
          unknown_constants = names - @constant_table.keys
          if unknown_constants.size > 0
            raise NameError, "#{unknown_constants.size > 1 ? 'Constants' : 'Constant'} #{unknown_constants.map{|e| "#{name}::#{e}"}.join(', ')} undefined"
      Severity: Major
      Found in core/module.rb and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
      core/module.rb on lines 188..196

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 55.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

        def public_constant(*names)
          names = names.map(&:to_sym)
          unknown_constants = names - @constant_table.keys
          if unknown_constants.size > 0
            raise NameError, "#{unknown_constants.size > 1 ? 'Constants' : 'Constant'} #{unknown_constants.map{|e| "#{name}::#{e}"}.join(', ')} undefined"
      Severity: Major
      Found in core/module.rb and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
      core/module.rb on lines 176..184

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 55.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

        def prepend(*modules)
          modules.reverse_each do |mod|
            if !mod.kind_of?(Module) or mod.kind_of?(Class)
              raise TypeError, "wrong argument type #{mod.class} (expected Module)"
            end
      Severity: Minor
      Found in core/module.rb and 1 other location - About 35 mins to fix
      core/zed.rb on lines 167..181

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 36.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      There are no issues that match your filters.

      Category
      Status