Method validate_enforced_styles has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def validate_enforced_styles(valid_cop_names) # rubocop:todo Metrics/AbcSize
valid_cop_names.each do |name|
styles = @config[name].select { |key, _| key.start_with?('Enforced') }
styles.each do |style_name, style|- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method check_cop_config_value has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def check_cop_config_value(hash, parent = nil)
hash.each do |key, value|
check_cop_config_value(value, key) if value.is_a?(Hash)
next unless CONFIG_CHECK_KEYS.include?(key) && value.is_a?(String)- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method reject_conflicting_safe_settings has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def reject_conflicting_safe_settings
@config.each do |name, cop_config|
next unless cop_config.is_a?(Hash)
next unless cop_config['Safe'] == false && cop_config['SafeAutoCorrect'] == true
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method list_unknown_cops has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def list_unknown_cops(invalid_cop_names)
unknown_cops = []
invalid_cop_names.each do |name|
# There could be a custom cop with this name. If so, don't warn
next if Cop::Registry.global.contains_cop_matching?([name])- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"