File setup.rb
has 675 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
require 'ruboto/sdk_versions'
require 'ruboto/util/verify'
module Ruboto
module Util
Method config_path
has a Cognitive Complexity of 32 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def config_path(accept_all)
unless @missing_paths.empty?
puts "\nYou are missing some paths. Execute these lines to add them:\n\n"
if windows?
@missing_paths.each do |path|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method check_for_haxm
has a Cognitive Complexity of 30 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def check_for_haxm
case android_package_os_id
when MAC_OS_X
@haxm_kext_loc = '/Library/Extensions/intelhaxm.kext'
found = File.exist?(@haxm_kext_loc)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method install_haxm
has a Cognitive Complexity of 30 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def install_haxm(accept_all, custom_version=nil)
haxm_file_override = "IntelHAXM_#{custom_version}.dmg" unless custom_version.nil?
if @haxm_installer_loc && (@haxm_kext_loc.nil? || haxm_old?)
if @haxm_kext_loc.nil?
puts 'HAXM not installed.'
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method install_ant
has a Cognitive Complexity of 20 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def install_ant(accept_all)
case android_package_os_id
when MAC_OS_X
when LINUX
install_package(accept_all, 'ant', 'Apache ANT')
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method install_java
has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def install_java(accept_all)
case android_package_os_id
when MAC_OS_X
when LINUX
install_package(accept_all, 'default-jdk', 'Default Java Development Kit')
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method get_tools_version
has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def get_tools_version(type='tool', repo_url = REPOSITORY_URL, host_os = nil)
require 'rexml/document'
require 'open-uri'
doc = REXML::Document.new(open(repo_url))
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method install_package
has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def install_package(accept_all, package_name, pretty_name)
case android_package_os_id
when LINUX
puts "#{pretty_name} was not found."
installer = package_installer
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method config_path
has 55 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def config_path(accept_all)
unless @missing_paths.empty?
puts "\nYou are missing some paths. Execute these lines to add them:\n\n"
if windows?
@missing_paths.each do |path|
Method install_all
has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def install_all(accept_all, api_levels, upgrade_haxm)
install_java(accept_all) unless @java_loc && @javac_loc
install_ant(accept_all) unless @ant_loc
install_android_sdk(accept_all) unless @android_loc
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method install_ant
has 52 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def install_ant(accept_all)
case android_package_os_id
when MAC_OS_X
when LINUX
install_package(accept_all, 'ant', 'Apache ANT')
Method install_java
has 45 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def install_java(accept_all)
case android_package_os_id
when MAC_OS_X
when LINUX
install_package(accept_all, 'default-jdk', 'Default Java Development Kit')
Method install_android_sdk
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def install_android_sdk(accept_all)
unless @android_loc
puts 'Android package installer not found.'
unless accept_all
print 'Would you like to download and install it? (Y/n): '
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method check_for_haxm
has 40 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def check_for_haxm
case android_package_os_id
when MAC_OS_X
@haxm_kext_loc = '/Library/Extensions/intelhaxm.kext'
found = File.exist?(@haxm_kext_loc)
Method install_haxm
has 40 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def install_haxm(accept_all, custom_version=nil)
haxm_file_override = "IntelHAXM_#{custom_version}.dmg" unless custom_version.nil?
if @haxm_installer_loc && (@haxm_kext_loc.nil? || haxm_old?)
if @haxm_kext_loc.nil?
puts 'HAXM not installed.'
Method install_package
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def install_package(accept_all, package_name, pretty_name)
case android_package_os_id
when LINUX
puts "#{pretty_name} was not found."
installer = package_installer
Method which
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def which(cmd)
exts = ENV['PATHEXT'] ? ENV['PATHEXT'].split(';') : ['']
ENV['PATH'].split(File::PATH_SEPARATOR).each do |path|
exts.each do |ext|
exe = File.join(path, "#{cmd}#{ext}")
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method check_for
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def check_for(cmd, pretty_name=nil, alt_dir=nil)
rv = which(cmd)
rv = nil if rv && rv.empty?
if rv
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method install_android_sdk
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def install_android_sdk(accept_all)
unless @android_loc
puts 'Android package installer not found.'
unless accept_all
print 'Would you like to download and install it? (Y/n): '
Method update_sdk
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def update_sdk(update_cmd, accept_all)
if accept_all
IO.popen(update_cmd, 'r+', external_encoding: Encoding::BINARY) do |cmd_io|
begin
output = ''.encode(Encoding::BINARY)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method install_android_tools
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def install_android_tools(accept_all)
if @android_loc and (@dx_loc.nil? || @adb_loc.nil? || @emulator_loc.nil? || @haxm_installer_loc.nil?)
puts 'Android tools not found.'
unless accept_all
print 'Would you like to download and install them? (Y/n): '
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method check_for_android_platform
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def check_for_android_platform(api_level)
@platform_sdk_loc[api_level] = File.expand_path "#{android_package_directory}/platforms/#{api_level}"
found = File.exist? @platform_sdk_loc[api_level]
@platform_sdk_loc[api_level] = nil unless found
puts "#{'%-25s' % "Platform SDK #{api_level}"}: #{(found ? 'Found' : 'Not found')}"
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method store_cookie
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def store_cookie(response)
return unless response['set-cookie']
header = response['set-cookie']
header.gsub! /expires=.{3},/, ''
header.split(',').each do |cookie|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method process_response
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def process_response(response)
store_cookie(response)
if response.code == '302'
redirect_url = response['location']
puts "Following redirect to #{redirect_url}"
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method process_download
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def process_download(filename, uri)
body = ''
Net::HTTP.start(uri.host, uri.port, use_ssl: uri.scheme == 'https', verify_mode: OpenSSL::SSL::VERIFY_NONE).request_get(uri.path) do |response|
unless response.is_a?(Net::HTTPSuccess)
raise "Download failed: #{response.code} #{response.message}: #{response.body if response.response_body_permitted?}"
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method android_package_directory
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def android_package_directory
return ENV['ANDROID_SDK'] if ENV['ANDROID_SDK']
return ENV['ANDROID_HOME'] if ENV['ANDROID_HOME']
adb_location = which('adb')
return File.dirname(File.dirname(Pathname.new(adb_location).realpath)) if adb_location
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if Dir.exist?(ENV['JAVA_HOME'])
@javac_loc = "#{ENV['JAVA_HOME'].gsub('\\', '/')}/bin/javac"
puts "Setting the JAVA_HOME environment variable to #{ENV['JAVA_HOME']}"
system %Q{setx JAVA_HOME "#{ENV['JAVA_HOME']}"}
@missing_paths << "#{File.dirname(@javac_loc)}"
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 37.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if Dir.exist?(ENV['ANT_HOME'])
@ant_loc = "#{ENV['ANT_HOME'].gsub('\\', '/')}/bin/ant"
puts "Setting the ANT_HOME environment variable to #{ENV['ANT_HOME']}"
system %Q{setx ANT_HOME "#{ENV['ANT_HOME']}"}
@missing_paths << "#{File.dirname(@ant_loc)}"
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 37.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76