Method reconfigure_jruby_core
has a Cognitive Complexity of 72 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def reconfigure_jruby_core(jruby_core_version)
Dir.chdir 'libs' do
jruby_core = Dir['jruby-core-*.jar'][-1]
log_action("Removing unneeded classes from #{jruby_core}") do
FileUtils.rm_rf 'tmp'
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File update.rb
has 628 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
require 'ruboto/version'
require 'ruboto/core_ext/rexml'
require 'ruboto/sdk_locations'
require 'ruboto/util/build'
Method reconfigure_jruby_core
has 243 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def reconfigure_jruby_core(jruby_core_version)
Dir.chdir 'libs' do
jruby_core = Dir['jruby-core-*.jar'][-1]
log_action("Removing unneeded classes from #{jruby_core}") do
FileUtils.rm_rf 'tmp'
Method update_manifest
has a Cognitive Complexity of 36 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def update_manifest(min_sdk, target, force = false)
log_action("\nAdding RubotoActivity, RubotoDialog, RubotoService, and SDK versions to the manifest") do
sdk_element = verify_manifest.elements['uses-sdk']
if project_api_level
min_sdk ||= project_api_level
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method update_test
has 79 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def update_test(force, target_level = nil)
root = Dir.getwd
if !File.exist?("#{root}/test") || !File.exist?("#{root}/test/AndroidManifest.xml") || !File.exist?("#{root}/test/ant.properties")
name = verify_strings.root.elements['string'].text.gsub(' ', '')
puts "\nGenerating Android test project #{name} in #{root}..."
Method update_jruby
has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def update_jruby(force, version, explicit = false)
installed_jruby_core = Dir.glob('libs/jruby-core-*.jar')[0]
installed_jruby_stdlib = Dir.glob('libs/jruby-stdlib-*.jar')[0]
unless force || (installed_jruby_core && installed_jruby_stdlib)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method update_test
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def update_test(force, target_level = nil)
root = Dir.getwd
if !File.exist?("#{root}/test") || !File.exist?("#{root}/test/AndroidManifest.xml") || !File.exist?("#{root}/test/ant.properties")
name = verify_strings.root.elements['string'].text.gsub(' ', '')
puts "\nGenerating Android test project #{name} in #{root}..."
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method reconfigure_dx_jar
has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def reconfigure_dx_jar
Dir.chdir 'libs' do
log_action("Removing unneeded classes from #{DX_JAR}") do
FileUtils.rm_rf 'tmp'
Dir.mkdir 'tmp'
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method update_manifest
has 42 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def update_manifest(min_sdk, target, force = false)
log_action("\nAdding RubotoActivity, RubotoDialog, RubotoService, and SDK versions to the manifest") do
sdk_element = verify_manifest.elements['uses-sdk']
if project_api_level
min_sdk ||= project_api_level
Method update_jruby
has 40 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def update_jruby(force, version, explicit = false)
installed_jruby_core = Dir.glob('libs/jruby-core-*.jar')[0]
installed_jruby_stdlib = Dir.glob('libs/jruby-stdlib-*.jar')[0]
unless force || (installed_jruby_core && installed_jruby_stdlib)
Method update_classes
has 37 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def update_classes(old_version, force = nil)
copier = Ruboto::Util::AssetCopier.new Ruboto::ASSETS, '.'
log_action('Ruboto java classes') { copier.copy "#{JAVA_SRC_DIR}/org/ruboto/*.java" }
log_action('Ruboto java classes') { copier.copy "#{JAVA_SRC_DIR}/org/jruby/**/*.java" }
log_action('Ruboto java classes') { copier.copy "#{JAVA_SRC_DIR}/java/**/*.java" }
Method update_project_properties_target_level
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def update_project_properties_target_level(prop_file, target_level)
if (project_property_file = File.read(prop_file)) =~ TARGET_VERSION_REGEXP
min_sdk = $2
if target_level
unless target_level == min_sdk
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method update_classes
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def update_classes(old_version, force = nil)
copier = Ruboto::Util::AssetCopier.new Ruboto::ASSETS, '.'
log_action('Ruboto java classes') { copier.copy "#{JAVA_SRC_DIR}/org/ruboto/*.java" }
log_action('Ruboto java classes') { copier.copy "#{JAVA_SRC_DIR}/org/jruby/**/*.java" }
log_action('Ruboto java classes') { copier.copy "#{JAVA_SRC_DIR}/java/**/*.java" }
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method update_ruboto
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def update_ruboto(force=nil)
source_files_pattern = 'ruboto{.rb,/**/*}'
new_sources_dir = Ruboto::GEM_ROOT + "/assets/#{SCRIPTS_DIR}"
new_sources = Dir.chdir(new_sources_dir) { Dir[source_files_pattern] }.
select { |f| !(File.directory?("#{new_sources_dir}/#{f}") || File.basename(f) == '.' || File.basename(f) == '..') }
Method install_jruby_jars_gem
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def install_jruby_jars_gem(jruby_jars_version = ENV['JRUBY_JARS_VERSION'])
if jruby_jars_version
version_requirement = %{ -v "#{jruby_jars_version}"}
end
`gem query -i -n jruby-jars#{version_requirement}`
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method update_icons
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def update_icons(force = nil)
log_action('Copying icons') do
Ruboto::Util::AssetCopier.new(Ruboto::ASSETS, '.', force).copy 'res/drawable/get_ruboto_core.png'
icon_path = verify_manifest.elements['application'].attributes['android:icon']
test_icon_path = verify_test_manifest.elements['application'].attributes['android:icon']
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
excluded_core_packages = %w(**/*.sh **/*Darwin* **/*Solaris* **/*windows* **/*Windows* META-INF com/headius/invokebinder com/headius/options/example com/kenai/constantine com/kenai/jffi com/kenai/jnr/x86asm com/martiansoftware jni jnr/constants/platform/darwin jnr/constants/platform/fake jnr/constants/platform/freebsd jnr/constants/platform/openbsd jnr/constants/platform/sunos jnr/enxio jnr/ffi/annotations jnr/ffi/byref jnr/ffi/mapper jnr/ffi/provider jnr/ffi/util jnr/ffi/Struct$* jnr/ffi/types jnr/posix/Aix* jnr/posix/FreeBSD* jnr/posix/MacOS* jnr/posix/OpenBSD* jnr/x86asm org/jruby/ant org/jruby/cext org/jruby/compiler/impl/BaseBodyCompiler* org/jruby/compiler/util org/jruby/demo org/jruby/embed/bsf org/jruby/embed/jsr223 org/jruby/embed/osgi org/jruby/ext/ffi/AbstractMemory* org/jruby/ext/ffi/Enums* org/jruby/ext/ffi/io org/jruby/ext/ffi/jffi org/jruby/javasupport/bsf org/yecht yaml.rb)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 48.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
excluded_core_packages = %w(*.sh **/*Darwin* **/*Solaris* **/*windows* **/*Windows* META-INF com/headius/invokebinder com/headius/options/example com/kenai/constantine com/kenai/jffi com/kenai/jnr/x86asm com/martiansoftware jni jnr/constants/platform/darwin jnr/constants/platform/fake jnr/constants/platform/freebsd jnr/constants/platform/openbsd jnr/constants/platform/sunos jnr/enxio jnr/ffi/annotations jnr/ffi/byref jnr/ffi/mapper jnr/ffi/provider jnr/ffi/util jnr/ffi/Struct$* jnr/ffi/types jnr/posix/Aix* jnr/posix/FreeBSD* jnr/posix/MacOS* jnr/posix/OpenBSD* jnr/x86asm org/jruby/ant org/jruby/cext org/jruby/compiler/impl/BaseBodyCompiler* org/jruby/compiler/util org/jruby/demo org/jruby/embed/bsf org/jruby/embed/jsr223 org/jruby/embed/osgi org/jruby/ext/ffi/AbstractMemory* org/jruby/ext/ffi/Enums* org/jruby/ext/ffi/io org/jruby/ext/ffi/jffi org/jruby/javasupport/bsf org/yecht yaml.rb)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 48.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
excluded_core_packages = %w(**/*Darwin* **/*Solaris* **/*windows* **/*Windows* META-INF com/headius com/kenai/constantine com/kenai/jffi com/kenai/jnr/x86asm com/martiansoftware jline jni jnr/constants/platform/darwin jnr/constants/platform/fake jnr/constants/platform/freebsd jnr/constants/platform/openbsd jnr/constants/platform/sunos jnr/ffi/annotations jnr/ffi/byref jnr/ffi/mapper jnr/ffi/provider jnr/ffi/util jnr/ffi/Struct$* jnr/ffi/types jnr/posix/Aix* jnr/posix/FreeBSD* jnr/posix/MacOS* jnr/posix/OpenBSD* jnr/x86asm org/apache org/fusesource org/jruby/ant org/jruby/cext org/jruby/compiler/impl/BaseBodyCompiler* org/jruby/compiler/util org/jruby/demo org/jruby/embed/bsf org/jruby/embed/jsr223 org/jruby/embed/osgi org/jruby/ext/ffi/AbstractMemory* org/jruby/ext/ffi/io org/jruby/ext/ffi/jffi org/jruby/ext/ripper org/jruby/ext/tracepoint org/jruby/javasupport/bsf org/yecht)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 48.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
excluded_core_packages = %w(**/*Darwin* **/*Solaris* **/*windows* **/*Windows* META-INF com/headius/invokebinder com/headius/options/example com/kenai/constantine com/kenai/jffi com/kenai/jnr/x86asm com/martiansoftware jni jnr/constants/platform/darwin jnr/constants/platform/fake jnr/constants/platform/freebsd jnr/constants/platform/openbsd jnr/constants/platform/sunos jnr/enxio jnr/ffi/annotations jnr/ffi/byref jnr/ffi/mapper jnr/ffi/provider jnr/ffi/util jnr/ffi/Struct$* jnr/ffi/types jnr/posix/Aix* jnr/posix/FreeBSD* jnr/posix/MacOS* jnr/posix/OpenBSD* jnr/x86asm org/jruby/ant org/jruby/cext org/jruby/compiler/impl/BaseBodyCompiler* org/jruby/compiler/util org/jruby/demo org/jruby/embed/bsf org/jruby/embed/jsr223 org/jruby/embed/osgi org/jruby/ext/ffi/AbstractMemory* org/jruby/ext/ffi/Enums* org/jruby/ext/ffi/io org/jruby/ext/ffi/jffi org/jruby/javasupport/bsf org/yecht yaml.rb)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 47.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
excluded_core_packages = %w(**/*Darwin* **/*Solaris* **/*windows* **/*Windows* META-INF com/headius/invokebinder com/headius/options/example com/kenai/constantine com/kenai/jffi com/kenai/jnr/x86asm com/martiansoftware jni jnr/constants/platform/darwin jnr/constants/platform/fake jnr/constants/platform/freebsd jnr/constants/platform/openbsd jnr/constants/platform/sunos jnr/enxio jnr/ffi/annotations jnr/ffi/byref jnr/ffi/mapper jnr/ffi/provider jnr/ffi/util jnr/ffi/Struct$* jnr/ffi/types jnr/posix/Aix* jnr/posix/FreeBSD* jnr/posix/MacOS* jnr/posix/OpenBSD* jnr/x86asm org/jruby/ant org/jruby/cext org/jruby/compiler/impl/BaseBodyCompiler* org/jruby/compiler/util org/jruby/demo org/jruby/embed/bsf org/jruby/embed/jsr223 org/jruby/embed/osgi org/jruby/ext/ffi/AbstractMemory* org/jruby/ext/ffi/Enums* org/jruby/ext/ffi/io org/jruby/ext/ffi/jffi org/jruby/javasupport/bsf org/yecht yaml.rb)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 47.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
excluded_core_packages = %w(**/*Darwin* **/*Solaris* **/*windows* **/*Windows* META-INF com/headius com/kenai/constantine com/kenai/jffi com/kenai/jnr/x86asm com/martiansoftware jni jnr/constants/platform/darwin jnr/constants/platform/fake jnr/constants/platform/freebsd jnr/constants/platform/openbsd jnr/constants/platform/sunos jnr/ffi/annotations jnr/ffi/byref jnr/ffi/mapper jnr/ffi/provider jnr/ffi/util jnr/ffi/Struct$* jnr/ffi/types jnr/posix/Aix* jnr/posix/FreeBSD* jnr/posix/MacOS* jnr/posix/OpenBSD* jnr/x86asm org/jruby/ant org/jruby/cext org/jruby/compiler/impl/BaseBodyCompiler* org/jruby/compiler/util org/jruby/demo org/jruby/embed/bsf org/jruby/embed/jsr223 org/jruby/embed/osgi org/jruby/ext/ffi/AbstractMemory* org/jruby/ext/ffi/io org/jruby/ext/ffi/jffi org/jruby/ext/tracepoint org/jruby/javasupport/bsf org/yecht)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 44.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
excluded_core_packages = %w(**/*Darwin* **/*Solaris* **/*windows* **/*Windows* META-INF com/headius com/kenai/constantine com/kenai/jffi com/kenai/jnr/x86asm com/martiansoftware jline jni jnr/constants/platform/darwin jnr/constants/platform/fake jnr/constants/platform/freebsd jnr/constants/platform/openbsd jnr/constants/platform/sunos jnr/ffi/annotations jnr/ffi/byref jnr/ffi/provider jnr/ffi/util jnr/ffi/Struct$* jnr/ffi/types jnr/posix/FreeBSD* jnr/posix/MacOS* jnr/posix/OpenBSD* jnr/x86asm org/apache org/fusesource org/jruby/ant org/jruby/cext org/jruby/compiler/impl/BaseBodyCompiler* org/jruby/compiler/util org/jruby/demo org/jruby/embed/bsf org/jruby/embed/jsr223 org/jruby/embed/osgi org/jruby/ext/ffi/AbstractMemory* org/jruby/ext/ffi/io org/jruby/ext/ffi/jffi org/jruby/javasupport/bsf org/yecht)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 44.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
excluded_core_packages = [
'**/*Aix*',
'**/*Darwin*',
'**/*FreeBSD*',
'**/*MacOS*',
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 43.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
excluded_core_packages = %w(**/*Aix* **/*Darwin* **/*FreeBSD* **/*MacOS* **/*OpenBSD* **/*Solaris* **/*sunos* **/*Windows* META-INF com/headius/invokebinder com/headius/options/example com/kenai/constantine com/kenai/jffi com/kenai/jnr/x86asm com/martiansoftware java jni jnr/constants/platform/fake jnr/enxio jnr/ffi/annotations jnr/ffi/byref jnr/ffi/mapper jnr/ffi/provider jnr/ffi/util jnr/ffi/Struct$* jnr/ffi/types jnr/x86asm org/jruby/ant org/jruby/cext org/jruby/compiler/impl/BaseBodyCompiler* org/jruby/compiler/util org/jruby/demo org/jruby/embed/bsf org/jruby/embed/jsr223 org/jruby/embed/osgi org/jruby/ext/ffi/AbstractMemory* org/jruby/ext/ffi/Enums* org/jruby/ext/ffi/io org/jruby/ext/ffi/jffi org/jruby/javasupport/bsf org/yecht)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 43.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
excluded_core_packages = [
'**/*Aix*',
'**/*Darwin*',
'**/*FreeBSD*',
'**/*MacOS*',
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 43.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
excluded_core_packages = [
# FIXME(uwe): Exclude these packages?
# '**/*Darwin*',
# '**/*Solaris*',
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 31.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
excluded_core_packages = [
# FIXME(uwe): Exclude these packages?
# '**/*Darwin*',
# '**/*Solaris*',
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 31.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76