Sign upLogin

ruby-rdf/rdf

View on GitHub
Star
lib/rdf/writer.rb

Summary

Maintainability
D
1 day
Test Coverage

Class Writer has 37 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  class Writer
    extend  ::Enumerable
    extend  RDF::Util::Aliasing::LateBound
    include RDF::Util::Logger
    include RDF::Writable
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/rdf/writer.rb - About 4 hrs to fix

    Method write_statement has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def write_statement(statement)
      statement = statement.canonicalize! if canonicalize?

      # Make sure BNodes in statement use unique identifiers
      if statement.node?
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/rdf/writer.rb - About 3 hrs to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    File writer.rb has 282 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    module RDF
  ##
  # The base class for RDF serializers.
  #
  # @example Loading an RDF writer implementation
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/rdf/writer.rb - About 2 hrs to fix

      Method options has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          def self.options
      [
        RDF::CLI::Option.new(
          symbol: :canonicalize,
          datatype: TrueClass,
      Severity: Minor
      Found in lib/rdf/writer.rb - About 1 hr to fix

        Method write_statement has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

            def write_statement(statement)
      statement = statement.canonicalize! if canonicalize?

      # Make sure BNodes in statement use unique identifiers
      if statement.node?
        Severity: Minor
        Found in lib/rdf/writer.rb - About 1 hr to fix

          Method dump has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

              def self.dump(data, io = nil, **options)
      io = File.open(io, 'w') if io.is_a?(String)
      method = data.respond_to?(:each_statement) ? :each_statement : :each
      if io
        new(io, **options) do |writer|
          Severity: Minor
          Found in lib/rdf/writer.rb - About 45 mins to fix

          Cognitive Complexity

          Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

          A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

          • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
          • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
          • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

          Further reading

          Method prefix has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

              def prefix(name, uri = nil)
      name = name.to_s.empty? ? nil : (name.respond_to?(:to_sym) ? name.to_sym : name.to_s.to_sym)
      uri.nil? ? prefixes[name] : prefixes[name] = uri
    end
          Severity: Minor
          Found in lib/rdf/writer.rb - About 35 mins to fix

          Cognitive Complexity

          Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

          A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

          • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
          • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
          • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

          Further reading

          Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

              def encoding
      case @options[:encoding]
      when String, Symbol
        Encoding.find(@options[:encoding].to_s)
      when Encoding
          Severity: Minor
          Found in lib/rdf/writer.rb and 1 other location - About 30 mins to fix
          lib/rdf/reader.rb on lines 590..598

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 33.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

              def prefix(name, uri = nil)
      name = name.to_s.empty? ? nil : (name.respond_to?(:to_sym) ? name.to_sym : name.to_s.to_sym)
      uri.nil? ? prefixes[name] : prefixes[name] = uri
    end
          Severity: Minor
          Found in lib/rdf/writer.rb and 1 other location - About 25 mins to fix
          lib/rdf/reader.rb on lines 388..391

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 29.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

                      arg.split(',').inject({}) do |memo, pfxuri|
              pfx,uri = pfxuri.split(':', 2)
              memo.merge(pfx.to_sym => RDF::URI(uri))
          Severity: Minor
          Found in lib/rdf/writer.rb and 1 other location - About 15 mins to fix
          lib/rdf/reader.rb on lines 156..158

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 25.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          There are no issues that match your filters.

          Category
          Status