Showing 406 of 406 total issues
Method handle_directive
has a Cognitive Complexity of 51 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def handle_directive prefix, directive, param, code_object = nil,
encoding = nil, line = nil
blankline = "#{prefix.strip}\n"
directive = directive.downcase
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method process_args
has 187 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.process_args argv
options = default_options
opts = OptionParser.new do |opt|
opt.program_name = File.basename $0
Method parse_constant_body
has a Cognitive Complexity of 45 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse_constant_body container, constant, is_array_or_hash # :nodoc:
nest = 0
rhs_name = ''.dup
get_tkread
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method parse_method_or_yield_parameters
has a Cognitive Complexity of 45 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse_method_or_yield_parameters(method = nil,
modifiers = RDoc::METHOD_MODIFIERS)
skip_tkspace_without_nl
tk = get_tk
end_token = get_end_token tk
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File darkfish.rb
has 439 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
require 'erb'
require 'fileutils'
require 'pathname'
require_relative 'markup'
Function prototype
has 161 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Searcher.prototype = new function() {
// search is performed in chunks of 1000 for non-blocking user input
var CHUNK_SIZE = 1000;
// do not try to find more than 100 results
var MAX_RESULTS = 100;
Method resolve_method
has a Cognitive Complexity of 42 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def resolve_method name
ref = nil
if /#{CLASS_REGEXP_STR}([.#]|::)#{METHOD_REGEXP_STR}/o =~ name then
type = $2
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method build_verbatim
has a Cognitive Complexity of 38 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def build_verbatim margin
p :verbatim_begin => margin if @debug
verbatim = RDoc::Markup::Verbatim.new
min_indent = nil
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method parse_statements
has 142 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse_statements(container, single = NORMAL, current_method = nil,
comment = new_comment(''))
raise 'no' unless RDoc::Comment === comment
comment = RDoc::Encoding.change_encoding comment, @encoding if @encoding
Method normalized_file_list
has a Cognitive Complexity of 37 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def normalized_file_list(relative_files, force_doc = false,
exclude_pattern = nil)
file_list = {}
relative_files.each do |rel_file_name|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Class ClassModule
has 40 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class RDoc::ClassModule < RDoc::Context
##
# 1::
# RDoc 3.7
Method generate_file_files
has a Cognitive Complexity of 35 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def generate_file_files
setup
page_file = @template_dir + 'page.rhtml'
fileinfo_file = @template_dir + 'fileinfo.rhtml'
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File parser.rb
has 371 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
require 'strscan'
##
# A recursive-descent parser for RDoc markup.
#
Method handle_method
has a Cognitive Complexity of 30 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def handle_method(type, var_name, meth_name, function, param_count,
source_file = nil)
class_name = @known_classes[var_name]
singleton = @singleton_classes.key? var_name
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Class PrismRuby
has 34 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class RDoc::Parser::PrismRuby < RDoc::Parser
parse_files_matching(/\.rbw?$/) if ENV['RDOC_USE_PRISM_PARSER']
attr_accessor :visibility
Class C
has 32 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class RDoc::Parser::C < RDoc::Parser
parse_files_matching(/\.(?:([CcHh])\1?|c([+xp])\2|y)\z/)
include RDoc::Text
Method parse_constant
has a Cognitive Complexity of 26 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse_constant container, tk, comment, ignore_constants = false
line_no = tk[:line_no]
name = tk[:text]
skip_tkspace_without_nl
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function prototype
has a Cognitive Complexity of 26 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Search.prototype = Object.assign({}, Navigation, new function() {
var suid = 1;
this.init = function() {
var _this = this;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Class ToHtml
has 30 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class RDoc::Markup::ToHtml < RDoc::Markup::Formatter
include RDoc::Text
# :section: Utilities
Method to_html
has a Cognitive Complexity of 25 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.to_html token_stream
starting_title = false
token_stream.map do |t|
next unless t
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"