Class Specification
has 176 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class Gem::Specification < Gem::BasicSpecification
extend Gem::Deprecate
# REFACTOR: Consider breaking out this version stuff into a separate
# module. There's enough special stuff around it that it may justify
File specification.rb
has 1322 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
require_relative "deprecate"
require_relative "basic_specification"
require_relative "stub_specification"
require_relative "platform"
require_relative "specification_record"
Method _load
has a Cognitive Complexity of 25 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self._load(str)
Gem.load_yaml
Gem.load_safe_marshal
yaml_set = false
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method to_ruby
has a Cognitive Complexity of 20 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def to_ruby
result = []
result << "# -*- encoding: utf-8 -*-"
result << "#{Gem::StubSpecification::PREFIX}#{name} #{version} #{platform} #{raw_require_paths.join("\0")}"
result << "#{Gem::StubSpecification::PREFIX}#{extensions.join "\0"}" unless
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method _load
has 59 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self._load(str)
Gem.load_yaml
Gem.load_safe_marshal
yaml_set = false
Method to_ruby
has 57 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def to_ruby
result = []
result << "# -*- encoding: utf-8 -*-"
result << "#{Gem::StubSpecification::PREFIX}#{name} #{version} #{platform} #{raw_require_paths.join("\0")}"
result << "#{Gem::StubSpecification::PREFIX}#{extensions.join "\0"}" unless
Method pretty_print
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def pretty_print(q) # :nodoc:
q.group 2, "Gem::Specification.new do |s|", "end" do
q.breakable
attributes = @@attributes - [:name, :version]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method traverse
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def traverse(trail = [], visited = {}, &block)
trail.push(self)
begin
runtime_dependencies.each do |dep|
dep.matching_specs(true).each do |dep_spec|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method activate_dependencies
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def activate_dependencies
unresolved = Gem::Specification.unresolved_deps
runtime_dependencies.each do |spec_dep|
if loaded = Gem.loaded_specs[spec_dep.name]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method load
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.load(file)
return unless file
spec = @load_cache_mutex.synchronize { @load_cache[file] }
return spec if spec
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method load
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.load(file)
return unless file
spec = @load_cache_mutex.synchronize { @load_cache[file] }
return spec if spec
Method initialize_copy
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize_copy(other_spec)
self.class.array_attributes.each do |name|
name = :"@#{name}"
next unless other_spec.instance_variable_defined? name
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method build_extensions
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def build_extensions # :nodoc:
return if extensions.empty?
return if default_gem?
# we need to fresh build when same name and version of default gems
return if self.class.find_by_full_name(full_name)&.default_gem?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method normalize
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def normalize
if defined?(@extra_rdoc_files) && @extra_rdoc_files
@extra_rdoc_files.uniq!
@files ||= []
@files.concat(@extra_rdoc_files)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method dependent_gems
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def dependent_gems(check_dev=true)
out = []
Gem::Specification.each do |spec|
deps = check_dev ? spec.dependencies : spec.runtime_dependencies
deps.each do |dep|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method required_ruby_version=
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def required_ruby_version=(req)
@required_ruby_version = Gem::Requirement.create req
@required_ruby_version.requirements.map! do |op, v|
if v >= LATEST_RUBY_WITHOUT_PATCH_VERSIONS && v.release.segments.size == 4
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method ruby_code
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def ruby_code(obj)
case obj
when String then obj.dump + ".freeze"
when Array then "[" + obj.map {|x| ruby_code x }.join(", ") + "]"
when Hash then
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method conflicts
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def conflicts
conflicts = {}
runtime_dependencies.each do |dep|
spec = Gem.loaded_specs[dep.name]
if spec && !spec.satisfies_requirement?(dep)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return unless File.exist?(File.join(base_dir, "extensions"))
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return unless File.writable?(base_dir)
Method reset
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.reset
@@dirs = nil
Gem.pre_reset_hooks.each(&:call)
@specification_record = nil
clear_load_cache
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method method_missing
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def method_missing(sym, *a, &b) # :nodoc:
if REMOVED_METHODS.include?(sym)
removed_method_calls << sym
return
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method _resort!
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self._resort!(specs) # :nodoc:
specs.sort! do |a, b|
names = a.name <=> b.name
next names if names.nonzero?
versions = b.version <=> a.version
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method add_bindir
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def add_bindir(executables)
return nil if executables.nil?
if @bindir
Array(executables).map {|e| File.join(@bindir, e) }
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
HACK found Open
dep.instance_variable_set :@type, :runtime if dep.type.nil? # HACK
- Exclude checks
TODO found Open
# TODO: maybe we should switch to rubygems' version service?
- Exclude checks
HACK found Open
# HACK: the #to_s is in here because RSpec has an Array of Arrays of
- Exclude checks
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
@required_ruby_version.requirements.map! do |op, v|
if v >= LATEST_RUBY_WITHOUT_PATCH_VERSIONS && v.release.segments.size == 4
[op == "~>" ? "=" : op, Gem::Version.new(v.segments.tap {|s| s.delete_at(3) }.join("."))]
else
[op, v]
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 39.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76