File soapHandler.rb
has 476 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
require 'soap/encodingstyle/handler'
require 'soap/mapping/registry'
module SOAP
Method encode_attrs
has a Cognitive Complexity of 27 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def encode_attrs(generator, ns, data, parent)
attrs = {}
return attrs if data.is_a?(SOAPReference)
if !parent || parent.encodingstyle != EncodingNamespace
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Class SOAPHandler
has 25 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class SOAPHandler < Handler
Namespace = SOAP::EncodingNamespace
add_handler
def initialize(charset = nil)
Method decode_tag_by_wsdl
has a Cognitive Complexity of 20 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def decode_tag_by_wsdl(ns, elename, typestr, parent, arytypestr, attrs)
o = nil
if parent.class == SOAPBody
# root element: should branch by root attribute?
if @is_first_top_ele
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method encode_attrs
has 46 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def encode_attrs(generator, ns, data, parent)
attrs = {}
return attrs if data.is_a?(SOAPReference)
if !parent || parent.encodingstyle != EncodingNamespace
Method decode_tag_by_wsdl
has 41 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def decode_tag_by_wsdl(ns, elename, typestr, parent, arytypestr, attrs)
o = nil
if parent.class == SOAPBody
# root element: should branch by root attribute?
if @is_first_top_ele
Method encode_data
has 38 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def encode_data(generator, ns, data, parent)
attrs = encode_attrs(generator, ns, data, parent)
if parent && parent.is_a?(SOAPArray) && parent.position
attrs[ns.name(AttrPositionName)] = "[#{parent.position.join(',')}]"
end
Method decode_tag
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def decode_tag(ns, elename, attrs, parent)
@textbuf.clear
is_nil, type, arytype, root, offset, position, href, id =
extract_attrs(ns, attrs)
o = nil
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method decode_tag
has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def decode_tag(ns, elename, attrs, parent)
@textbuf.clear
is_nil, type, arytype, root, offset, position, href, id =
extract_attrs(ns, attrs)
o = nil
Method encode_data
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def encode_data(generator, ns, data, parent)
attrs = encode_attrs(generator, ns, data, parent)
if parent && parent.is_a?(SOAPArray) && parent.position
attrs[ns.name(AttrPositionName)] = "[#{parent.position.join(',')}]"
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method decode_defined_complextype
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def decode_defined_complextype(elename, typename, typedef, arytypestr)
case typedef.compoundtype
when :TYPE_STRUCT, :TYPE_MAP
o = SOAPStruct.decode(elename, typename)
o.definedtype = typedef
Method decode_parent
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def decode_parent(parent, node)
return unless parent.node
case parent.node
when SOAPUnknown
newparent = parent.node.as_struct
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method decode_tag_by_wsdl
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def decode_tag_by_wsdl(ns, elename, typestr, parent, arytypestr, attrs)
Method decode_tag_by_type
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def decode_tag_by_type(ns, elename, typestr, parent, arytypestr, attrs)
Method decode_tag_by_type
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def decode_tag_by_type(ns, elename, typestr, parent, arytypestr, attrs)
if arytypestr
type = typestr ? ns.parse(typestr) : ValueArrayName
node = SOAPArray.decode(elename, type, ns.parse(arytypestr))
node.extraattr.update(attrs)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method decode_resolve_id
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def decode_resolve_id
count = @refpool.length # To avoid infinite loop
while !@refpool.empty? && count > 0
@refpool = @refpool.find_all { |ref|
o = @idpool.find { |item|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return decode_basetype(klass, elename)
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return decode_tag_by_type(ns, elename, typestr, parent, arytypestr, attrs)
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return decode_tag_by_type(ns, elename, typestr, parent, arytypestr, attrs)
Method decode_tag_end
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def decode_tag_end(ns, node)
textbufstr = @textbuf.join
@textbuf.clear
o = node.node
if o.is_a?(SOAPUnknown)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
when SOAPArray
if node.position
parent.node[*(decode_arypos(node.position))] = node
parent.node.sparse = true
else
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 27.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76