Method complexobj2soapchildren_array
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def complexobj2soapchildren_array(obj, soap, child_ele, nillable)
child = Mapping.get_attribute(obj, child_ele.name.name)
if child.nil? and obj.is_a?(::Array)
child = obj
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method complexobj2sequencesoap
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def complexobj2sequencesoap(obj, soap, type, nillable, is_choice)
added = false
type.elements.each do |child_ele|
case child_ele
when WSDL::XMLSchema::Any
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method obj2elesoap
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def obj2elesoap(obj, eledef)
ele = nil
qualified = (eledef.elementform == 'qualified')
if obj.is_a?(SOAPNil)
ele = obj
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method obj2typesoap
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def obj2typesoap(obj, type)
ele = nil
if type.is_a?(::WSDL::XMLSchema::SimpleType)
ele = simpleobj2soap(obj, type)
else # complexType
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method obj2soap
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def obj2soap(obj, qname, obj_class = nil)
soap_obj = nil
if obj.is_a?(SOAPElement)
soap_obj = obj
elsif eledef = @definedelements[qname]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method complexobj2sequencesoap
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def complexobj2sequencesoap(obj, soap, type, nillable, is_choice)
Method simpleobj2soap
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def simpleobj2soap(obj, type)
type.check_lexical_format(obj)
return SOAPNil.new if obj.nil?
if type.base
ele = base2soap(obj, TypeMap[type.base])
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method complexobj2soapchildren_single
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def complexobj2soapchildren_single(obj, soap, child_ele, nillable)
child = Mapping.get_attribute(obj, child_ele.name.name)
case child
when NilClass
return false if nillable
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method soap2obj
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def soap2obj(node, obj_class = nil)
cause = nil
begin
return any2obj(node, obj_class)
rescue MappingError
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
elsif type.list
value = obj.is_a?(Array) ? obj.join(" ") : obj.to_s
ele = base2soap(value, SOAP::SOAPString)
else
raise MappingError.new("unsupported simpleType: #{type}")
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 25.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76