Sign upLogin

rubyjedi/soap4r

View on GitHub
Star
lib/wsdl/soap/wsdl2ruby.rb

Summary

Maintainability
C
1 day
Test Coverage

Method create_file has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def create_file
    @modulepath = @opt['module_path']
    create_classdef if @opt.key?('classdef')
    create_mapping_registry if @opt.key?('mapping_registry')
    create_servant_skelton(@opt['servant_skelton']) if @opt.key?('servant_skelton')
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/wsdl/soap/wsdl2ruby.rb - About 55 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method run has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def run
    unless @location
      raise RuntimeError, "WSDL location not given"
    end
    @wsdl = import(@location)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/wsdl/soap/wsdl2ruby.rb - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method create_servlet_stub has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def create_servlet_stub(servicename)
    @logger.info { "Creating servlet stub." }
    servicename ||= @wsdl.services[0].name.name
    @servlet_stub_filename = servicename + 'Servlet.rb'
    check_file(@servlet_stub_filename) or return
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/wsdl/soap/wsdl2ruby.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method check_file has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def check_file(filename)
    if @basedir
      filename = File.join(basedir, filename)
    end
    if FileTest.exist?(filename)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/wsdl/soap/wsdl2ruby.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method create_standalone_server_stub has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def create_standalone_server_stub(servicename)
    @logger.info { "Creating standalone stub." }
    servicename ||= @wsdl.services[0].name.name
    @standalone_server_stub_filename = servicename + '.rb'
    check_file(@standalone_server_stub_filename) or return
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/wsdl/soap/wsdl2ruby.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method create_cgi_stub has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def create_cgi_stub(servicename)
    @logger.info { "Creating CGI stub." }
    servicename ||= @wsdl.services[0].name.name
    @cgi_stubFilename = servicename + '.cgi'
    check_file(@cgi_stubFilename) or return
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/wsdl/soap/wsdl2ruby.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  def create_standalone_server_stub(servicename)
    @logger.info { "Creating standalone stub." }
    servicename ||= @wsdl.services[0].name.name
    @standalone_server_stub_filename = servicename + '.rb'
    check_file(@standalone_server_stub_filename) or return
Severity: Major
Found in lib/wsdl/soap/wsdl2ruby.rb and 2 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
lib/wsdl/soap/wsdl2ruby.rb on lines 124..135
lib/wsdl/soap/wsdl2ruby.rb on lines 154..165

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 72.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  def create_cgi_stub(servicename)
    @logger.info { "Creating CGI stub." }
    servicename ||= @wsdl.services[0].name.name
    @cgi_stubFilename = servicename + '.cgi'
    check_file(@cgi_stubFilename) or return
Severity: Major
Found in lib/wsdl/soap/wsdl2ruby.rb and 2 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
lib/wsdl/soap/wsdl2ruby.rb on lines 139..150
lib/wsdl/soap/wsdl2ruby.rb on lines 154..165

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 72.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  def create_servlet_stub(servicename)
    @logger.info { "Creating servlet stub." }
    servicename ||= @wsdl.services[0].name.name
    @servlet_stub_filename = servicename + 'Servlet.rb'
    check_file(@servlet_stub_filename) or return
Severity: Major
Found in lib/wsdl/soap/wsdl2ruby.rb and 2 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
lib/wsdl/soap/wsdl2ruby.rb on lines 124..135
lib/wsdl/soap/wsdl2ruby.rb on lines 139..150

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 72.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  def check_file(filename)
    if @basedir
      filename = File.join(basedir, filename)
    end
    if FileTest.exist?(filename)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/wsdl/soap/wsdl2ruby.rb and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
lib/wsdl/xmlSchema/xsd2ruby.rb on lines 131..149

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 47.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

There are no issues that match your filters.

Category
Status