Showing 5,448 of 5,450 total issues
Complex method namespace(limber)::namespace(dev)::namespace(setup)::task#gbs_submission (31.8) Open
task gbs_submission: ['limber:dev:setup:gbs'] do
plates = Purpose.find_by(name: 'GBS Stock').plates.order(id: :desc).limit(4)
template = SubmissionTemplate.find_by!(name: 'Limber-Htp - GBS')
plates.each do |plate|
order =
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Flog calculates the ABC score for methods. The ABC score is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions.
You can read more about ABC metrics or the flog tool
Complex method Studies::AssetGroupsController#add (31.8) Open
def add # rubocop:todo Metrics/AbcSize, Metrics/MethodLength
@asset_group = AssetGroup.find(params[:id])
@study = Study.find(params[:study_id])
if params[:asset]
ids = params[:asset].select { |_asset_id, checked| checked == '1' }.keys
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Flog calculates the ABC score for methods. The ABC score is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions.
You can read more about ABC metrics or the flog tool
Complex method StudiesController#studies_from_scope (31.6) Open
def studies_from_scope(scope) # rubocop:todo Metrics/CyclomaticComplexity
studies =
case scope
when 'interesting'
Study.of_interest_to(current_user)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Flog calculates the ABC score for methods. The ABC score is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions.
You can read more about ABC metrics or the flog tool
Complex method Aliquot::Aliquotable::included (31.5) Open
def self.included(base) # rubocop:todo Metrics/AbcSize, Metrics/MethodLength
base.class_eval do
extend ClassMethods
has_many :aliquots
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Flog calculates the ABC score for methods. The ABC score is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions.
You can read more about ABC metrics or the flog tool
Complex method LabwhereReception#save (31.4) Open
def save # rubocop:todo Metrics/AbcSize
return false unless valid?
begin
scan =
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Flog calculates the ABC score for methods. The ABC score is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions.
You can read more about ABC metrics or the flog tool
Complex method Transfer::BetweenPlateAndTubes#tube_name_for (31.4) Open
def tube_name_for(stock_wells) # rubocop:todo Metrics/AbcSize
source_wells =
source.plate_purpose.source_wells_for(stock_wells).sort { |w1, w2| w1.map.column_order <=> w2.map.column_order }
stock_plates = source_wells.map(&:plate).uniq
raise StandardError, 'There appears to be no stock plate!' if stock_plates.empty?
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Flog calculates the ABC score for methods. The ABC score is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions.
You can read more about ABC metrics or the flog tool
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
with_association(:target_asset, decorator: WarehouseAsset) do
map_attribute_to_json_attribute(:uuid, 'target_asset_uuid')
map_attribute_to_json_attribute(:id, 'target_asset_internal_id')
map_attribute_to_json_attribute(:name, 'target_asset_name')
map_attribute_to_json_attribute(:barcode_number, 'target_asset_barcode')
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 56.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
with_association(:asset, decorator: WarehouseAsset) do
map_attribute_to_json_attribute(:uuid, 'source_asset_uuid')
map_attribute_to_json_attribute(:id, 'source_asset_internal_id')
map_attribute_to_json_attribute(:name, 'source_asset_name')
map_attribute_to_json_attribute(:barcode_number, 'source_asset_barcode')
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 56.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method submission_structure
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def submission_structure # rubocop:todo Metrics/CyclomaticComplexity
Hash
.new { |h, i| h[i] = Array.new }
.tap do |submission|
csv_data_rows.each_with_index do |row, index|
Method progress_report_header
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def progress_report_header
[
'Status',
'Study',
'Supplier',
Method stage
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def stage # rubocop:todo Metrics/CyclomaticComplexity
@workflow = Workflow.includes(:tasks).find(params[:workflow_id])
@stage = params[:id].to_i
@task = @workflow.tasks[@stage]
Complex method Core::Endpoint::BasicHandler::Json#core_path (31.3) Open
def core_path(*args) # rubocop:todo Metrics/AbcSize
options = args.extract_options!
response = options[:response]
root =
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Flog calculates the ABC score for methods. The ABC score is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions.
You can read more about ABC metrics or the flog tool
Complex method Request::Statemachine#destroy_aasm (31.3) Open
def destroy_aasm # rubocop:todo Metrics/MethodLength
# Destroy all evidence of the statemachine we've inherited! Ugly, but it works!
old_machine = AASM::StateMachineStore.fetch(self) && AASM::StateMachineStore.fetch(self).machine(:default)
if old_machine
old_machine.events.keys.each do |event|
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Flog calculates the ABC score for methods. The ABC score is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions.
You can read more about ABC metrics or the flog tool
Complex method Search::FindPlatesForUser#scope (31.2) Open
def scope(user_criteria) # rubocop:todo Metrics/AbcSize, Metrics/MethodLength
# We find all plates that do not have transfers where they are the source. Once a plate has been transferred
# (or marked for transfer) the destination plate becomes the end of the chain.
criteria = default_parameters.stringify_keys.merge(user_criteria)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Flog calculates the ABC score for methods. The ABC score is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions.
You can read more about ABC metrics or the flog tool
Complex method ModelExtensions::Request::included (31.1) Open
def self.included(base) # rubocop:todo Metrics/AbcSize
base.class_eval do
scope :include_source_asset,
-> { includes(asset: [:uuid_object, :barcodes, :scanned_into_lab_event, { aliquots: %i[sample tag] }]) }
scope :include_target_asset,
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Flog calculates the ABC score for methods. The ABC score is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions.
You can read more about ABC metrics or the flog tool
Method well_to_destination
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def well_to_destination # rubocop:todo Metrics/AbcSize
{}.tap do |sources_to_target|
# Group the wells based on the submission
groups = source.wells.in_column_major_order.with_pool_id.group_by(&:pool_id).delete_if { |k, _| k.nil? }.values
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method swap
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def swap(current_user, batch_info = {}) # rubocop:todo Metrics/CyclomaticComplexity
return false if batch_info.empty?
# Find the two lanes that are to be swapped
batch_request_left =
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method sorted_requests_for_destination_plate
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def sorted_requests_for_destination_plate(requests_to_sort) # rubocop:todo Metrics/CyclomaticComplexity
requests_to_sort.sort_by do |req|
if req.target_asset&.map&.column_order
[req.target_asset.plate.id, req.asset.plate&.pick_as_control? ? 0 : 1, req.target_asset.map.column_order]
else
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method perform_pick
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def perform_pick(requests, robot, control_source_plate, workflow_controller) # rubocop:todo Metrics/AbcSize
max_plates = robot.max_beds
raise StandardError, 'The chosen robot has no beds!' if max_plates.zero?
destination_plates = []
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method output_aliquot
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def output_aliquot(xml, aliquot) # rubocop:todo Metrics/AbcSize, Metrics/MethodLength
xml.sample(
sample_id: aliquot.sample_id,
library_id: aliquot.library_id,
library_name: aliquot.library_name,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"