Showing 12 of 12 total issues
Method input_output_for
has a Cognitive Complexity of 36 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def input_output_for(operation, input_output)
operation_name = operation['name']
# Look up the input by walking up to portType, then up to the message.
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Class Document
has 21 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class Document
ELEMENT_FORM_DEFAULTS = [:unqualified, :qualified]
# Validates if a given +value+ is a valid elementFormDefault value.
Class Parser
has 21 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class Parser
XSD = 'http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema'
WSDL = 'http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/'
SOAP_1_1 = 'http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/soap/'
Method input_output_for
has 50 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def input_output_for(operation, input_output)
operation_name = operation['name']
# Look up the input by walking up to portType, then up to the message.
Method parse_operations
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse_operations
operations = document.xpath('wsdl:definitions/wsdl:binding/wsdl:operation', 'wsdl' => WSDL)
operations.each do |operation|
name = operation.attribute('name').to_s
snakecase_name = Wasabi::CoreExt::String.snakecase(name).to_sym
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method process_type
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def process_type(namespace, type, name)
@types[namespace] ||= {}
@types[namespace][name] ||= { :namespace => namespace }
@types[namespace][name][:order!] = []
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method process_type
has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def process_type(namespace, type, name)
@types[namespace] ||= {}
@types[namespace][name] ||= { :namespace => namespace }
@types[namespace][name][:order!] = []
Method load_from_remote
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def load_from_remote
# TODO: remove_after_httpi
# support HTTPI and Faraday side by side
# dont reference HTTPI by constant until inside the conditional, in case it isn't loaded
if request.class.to_s.include?("HTTPI::Request")
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method parse_types
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse_types
schemas.each do |schema|
schema_namespace = schema['targetNamespace']
schema.element_children.each do |node|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method parse_operations_parameters
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse_operations_parameters
document.xpath("wsdl:definitions/wsdl:types/*[local-name()='schema']/*[local-name()='element']", 'wsdl' => WSDL).each do |element|
name = Wasabi::CoreExt::String.snakecase(element.attribute('name').to_s).to_sym
if operation = @operations[name]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def parse_messages
messages = document.root.element_children.select { |node| node.name == 'message' }
@messages = Hash[messages.map { |node| [node['name'], node] }]
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 25.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def parse_port_types
port_types = document.root.element_children.select { |node| node.name == 'portType' }
@port_types = Hash[port_types.map { |node| [node['name'], node] }]
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 25.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76