Method assume_role_from_profile
has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def assume_role_from_profile(cfg, profile, opts)
logger.debug "Entering assume_role_from_profile with #{cfg}, #{profile}, #{opts}"
prof_cfg = cfg[profile]
return unless cfg && prof_cfg
opts[:source_profile] ||= prof_cfg["source_profile"]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method credentials_from_keyring
has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def credentials_from_keyring(profile, opts)
logger.debug "Entering credentials_from_keyring"
return unless @parsed_config
logger.debug "credentials_from_keyring: @parsed_config found"
prof_cfg = @parsed_config[profile]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Class SharedConfigWithKeyring
has 21 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class AwsAssumeRole::Store::SharedConfigWithKeyring < AwsAssumeRole::Vendored::Aws::SharedConfig
include AwsAssumeRole::Store
include AwsAssumeRole::Logging
attr_reader :parsed_config
Method assume_role_from_profile
has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def assume_role_from_profile(cfg, profile, opts)
logger.debug "Entering assume_role_from_profile with #{cfg}, #{profile}, #{opts}"
prof_cfg = cfg[profile]
return unless cfg && prof_cfg
opts[:source_profile] ||= prof_cfg["source_profile"]
Method mfa_session
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def mfa_session(cfg, profile, opts)
prof_cfg = cfg[profile]
return unless cfg && prof_cfg
opts[:serial_number] ||= opts[:mfa_serial] || prof_cfg["mfa_serial"]
opts[:source_profile] ||= prof_cfg["source_profile"]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method resolve_parameter
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def resolve_parameter(param, cfg, prof_cfg)
return unless prof_cfg && cfg
return prof_cfg[param] if prof_cfg.key? param
source_profile = prof_cfg["source_profile"]
return unless source_profile
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method fresh
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def fresh(options = {})
@configuration = nil
@semaphore = nil
@assume_role_shared_config = nil
@profile_name = nil
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method initialize
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize(options = {})
@profile_name = determine_profile(options)
@config_enabled = options[:config_enabled]
@credentials_path = options[:credentials_path] ||
determine_credentials_path
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"